城市环境空气质量排名方法比较研究
doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510030
STUDY ON COMPARING RANKING METHODS OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IN URBAN AREA
-
摘要: 通过对空气质量排名中常用的综合指数法、最大指数法、内梅罗指数法、达标率排序法、污染物浓度排序法、层次分析加权综合指数法等多种方法的分析和比较,表明综合指数法和加权综合指数法能够兼顾各项污染物的贡献,可比性强,能够客观准确地反映不同城市空气质量状况优劣,适用于我国当前城市空气质量的排名。Abstract: This paper analysed and compared some conventional air quality ranking methods,including composite index, maximum index,Nemerow index,air quality compliance rate,major pollutant concentration,weighted composite index based on AHP methods and so on. Results showed that the composite index and weighted composite index both could consider contributions from all kinds of air pollutants,had well comparability for all cities,and reflected the differences between air quality in cities subjectively and accurately. The two methods were suitable for ranking the cities according to their own air quality at present.
-
Key words:
- air quality /
- ranking method /
- compare /
期刊类型引用(3)
1. 薛莲,刘岳峰,冯静. 2013—2019年青岛市空气质量综合指数及排名情况分析. 环境研究与监测. 2020(03): 26-28 . 百度学术
2. 李莉娜,潘本锋,王帅,董广霞. 基于环境库兹涅茨曲线的中国城市环境空气质量主要影响因素. 中国环境监测. 2017(05): 109-115 . 百度学术
3. 杨文卿,吴汉清,吕凯玲,朱诗琦,孔飞,卓倩. 层次分析法在泉州市和南安市大气环境质量评价中的应用研究. 环境科学与管理. 2016(04): 171-175 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 232
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 271
- 被引次数: 5