登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
RIGIONAL DISPARITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDING INDUSTRY IN JILIN PROVINCE
-
摘要: 利用吉林省"十二五"环境统计数据，通过计算畜禽单元密度、耕地总氮（磷）负荷、耕地猪氮（磷）密度、耕地总氮（磷）污染风险等指标，分析了吉林省畜禽养殖量区域差异，并评价其环境风险。结果表明：1）吉林省各地区畜禽养殖量呈现出中部地区较多，西部地区次之，而东部及东南部地区最少的分布特点；2）研究区畜禽养殖总氮（磷）产生量分别为23.18万，26.07万t，其中，图门地区总氮（磷）产生量均最低，而位于中部的长春、农安地区总磷产生量最高；3）各地区耕地总氮污染总体上较轻，只存在无污染、低污染和中污染现象，而总磷污染较严重，较高和高风险所占比重较高，其研究结果可为吉林省畜禽养殖业布局调整、环境污染治理和畜禽粪便资源化利用等决策提供支持。Abstract: Based on the environmental statistical data of "12th Five Year Plan" in Jilin province, this study analyzed the regional disparity of livestock and poultry breeding in Jilin province and evaluated the environmental risk by means of unit density of livestock and poultry, total nitrogen (phosphorus) load and pig nitrogen (phosphorus) density, and total nitrogen (phosphorus) pollution risk of cultivated land. The results showed that:1) there were more livestock and poultry cultivation in the central region of Jilin province, followed by the western region, while the eastern and southeast regions had the least distribution characteristics; 2) the total nitrogen (phosphorus) production of livestock and poultry cultivation in the study area were 231800, 260700 t respectively, among which the total nitrogen (phosphorus) production in Tumen was the lowest, while that in Changchun and Nongan region in the central region was the highest; 3) total nitrogen pollution of cultivated land in all regions was relatively light, just in rank of no pollution, low pollution and medium pollution, while the total phosphorus pollution was relatively more serious, with a higher proportion of sub-high risk and high risk. The research results could provide support for the decision-making of the layout adjustment of livestock and poultry breeding industry, environmental pollution control and utilization of livestock and poultry manure resources in Jilin.
-
Key words:
- livestock and poultry manures /
- nitrogen /
- phosphorus /
- Jilin province
-
吴根义,廖新俤,贺德春,等. 我国畜禽养殖污染防治现状及对策[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2014,33(7):1261-1264. 孙良媛,刘涛,张乐. 中国规模化畜禽养殖的现状及其对生态环境的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2016,15(2):23-30. 张晓华,王芳,郑晓书,等. 四川省畜禽粪便排放时空分布及污染防控[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(2):433-442. 龙雯琪,吴根义,林毅青. 湘潭县近十年畜禽养殖量及其耕地磷污染负荷分析[J]. 中国种业,2014,15(7):66-69. 易秀,陈生婧,田浩. 陕西省养殖业畜禽粪便氮耕地负荷的时空分布[J]. 水土保持通报,2016,36(5):235-240. 付强,诸云强,杨红新,等. 2002-2009年中国规模化畜禽养殖量区域差异及政策建议[J]. 农业工程学报,2012,28(18):185-191. KELLOGG R L, LANDER C H, MOFFITT D C, et al. Manure nutrients relative to the capacity of cropland and pastureland to assimilate nutrients:spatial and temporal trends for the United States[R]. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service and Economic Research Service. 孟岑,李裕元,许晓光,等. 亚热带流域氮磷排放与养殖业环境承载力实例研究[J]. 环境科学学报,2013,33(2):635-643. 国家环境保护总局自然生态保护司. 全国规模化畜禽养殖业污染情况调查及防治对策[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002:14-103. 朱建春,张增强,樊志民,等. 中国畜禽粪便的能源潜力与氮磷耕地负荷及总量控制[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(3):435-445. 王方浩,马文奇,窦争霞,等. 中国畜禽粪便产生量估算及环境效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2006, 26(5):614-617. 李娜,韩维峥,沈梦楠,等.基于输出系数模型的水库汇水区农业面源污染负荷估算[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(8):224-230. PENG L H, CHEN W W, LI M, et al. GIS-based study of the spatial distribution suitability of livestock and poultry farming:The case of Putian, Fujian, China[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2014,108:183-190. 武兰芳,欧阳竹. 基于农田氮磷收支的区域养殖畜禽容量分析:以山东禹城为例[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2009,28(11):2277-2285. 沈根祥,钱晓雍,梁丹涛,等. 基于氮磷养分管理的畜禽场粪便匹配农田面积[J]. 农业工程学报,2006(增刊2):268-271. 潘瑜春,孙超,刘玉,等. 基于土地消纳粪便能力的畜禽养殖承载力[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(4):232-239. 冯爱萍,王雪蕾,刘忠,等. 东北三省畜禽养殖环境风险时空特征[J]. 环境科学研究,2015, 28(6):967-974. 张强,何若曦,唐娜,等. 浠水县畜禽养殖污染现状调查及减排技术研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(5):285-287. 耿维,胡林,崔建宇,等. 中国区域畜禽粪便能源潜力及总量控制研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(1):171-180. 韩晓飞.三峡库区农田土壤无机磷动态变化及其迁移特征[D].重庆:西南大学,2016. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 246
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
