OPERATION EFFECT AND CONTROL SCHEME OPTIMIZATION OF AN INVERTED A2/O PROCESS
-
摘要: 以城市污水处理厂倒置A2/O工艺为研究对象,介绍了工艺基本情况、主要工艺设计参数及技术特点。对2017—2018年污水处理厂出水的水质进行分析,结果表明:倒置A2/O工艺可有效去除COD及BOD5,脱氮除磷功能显著。并提出了碳源投加点位、污泥外回流比及曝气池末端DO的优化控制方案。夏、秋季节,控制污泥外回流比为60%~75%、硝化液回流比为100%~150%、曝气池末端ρ(DO)为1.5~3.0 mg/L;冬、春季节控制污泥外回流比为120%~150%、硝化液回流比为200%~250%、曝气池末端ρ(DO)为3.0~5.0 mg/L,可获得较好的污染物去除效果。污水出水ρ(COD)均值为26.1 mg/L,去除率为90.4%;出水ρ(TN)均值为7.69 mg/L,去除率为78.1%;出水ρ(NH4+-N)均值为0.445 mg/L,去除率为98.3%。通过改变除磷药剂投加点位及建设药剂自动化投加系统的方式优化除磷,实际投加量为2.5 t/d,节省了药剂费用,出水ρ(TP)均值为0.194 mg/L,去除率为96.7%。Abstract: Take the inverted A2/O process of the municipal sewage treatment plant as the research object, this paper introduced the basic situation, main design parameters and technical characteristics of the process, and analyzed water quality test data of the past two years. The results showed that the inverted A2/O process could effectively remove COD and BOD5, and the function of nitrogen and phosphorus removal was notable. An optimal control scheme for the carbon source dosing point, the sludge external reflux ratio and the DO at the end of the aeration tank, was proposed. In summer and autumn, the external reflux ratio of sludge was controlled in 60%~75%, the reflux ratio of nitrifying liquid in 100%~150%, and the DO at the end of aeration tank in 1.5~3.0 mg/L. In winter and spring, the external sludge reflux ratio was controlled in 120%~150%, the nitrification liquid reflux ratio in 200%~250%, and the aeration tank end DO in 3.0~5.0 mg/L, all of which could obtain better pollutant removal effect as follows: the effluent COD average value was 26.1 mg/L, the removal rate was 90.4%, the effluent TN average value was 7.69 mg/L, the removal rate was 78.1%, the effluent ammonia nitrogen average value was 0.445 mg/L, and the removal rate was 98.3%.Phosphorus removal was achieved by changing the addition point of phosphorus removal agents and building an automated chemical dosing system. Then the actual dosage of the phosphorus removal agent was reduced obviously to 2.5 t/d, and the TP average of the effluent was 0.194 mg/L, with a removal rate of 96.7%.
-
张波,戚永洁,蒋素英,等.铁碳微电解-生物膜法-高级氧化工艺处理印染废水中试研究[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):44-48. 蔡效猛,郑雨.印染废水处理技术研究进展[J].印染助剂,2018,35(3):5-8. 高融,张进,孟平.MBR平板膜在机械加工废水中应用及清洗研究[J].水处理技术,2017,43(2):134-135. 林明,张石伟,李京军,等.机械加工过程产生含油污水的组合处理技术研究[J].环境工程,2010,28(5):1-4. 王华山,陈庆杰,于秀春.食品发酵污水沼气回收利用技术[J].食品工业,2018,39(9):213-215. 阮智宇,郑凯凯,苏挥,等.CAST工艺运行诊断和优化调控分析[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(20):50-54. 姚宁波,殷成强.A2O污水处理工艺的运行过程及控制述评[J].环保科技,2017,23(4):60-64. 毕学军,张波.倒置A2/O工艺生物脱氮除磷原理及其生产应用[J].环境工程,2006(3):29-30,9,3. 李亚静,孙力平.常规A2/O工艺和倒置A2/O工艺处理城市污水比较研究[J].环境工程,2015,33(增刊1):967-970. 郭玉梅,吴毅辉,郭昉,等.某污水厂A2O和倒置A2O工艺脱氮除磷性能分析[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(5):2185-2190. 环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准:GB 18918-2002[S].北京:中国环境出版社,2002. 张硕,邹伟国.多点进水的倒置AAO工艺处理低碳源城市合流污水[J].环境科技,2014,27(1):11-14. 李茂侨,陈志强,温沁雪.延长缺氧水力停留时间对A-AAO工艺氮磷去除影响的研究[J].环境科学与管理,2018,43(1):102-107. 杨思敏,齐嵘,杨敏.低温对生物接触氧化反应器硝化性能的影响[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(11):3028-3033. 郑兴灿,李亚新.污水除磷脱氮技术[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1998. 胡朝晖,余健,刘钢,等.反硝化生物滤池除污性能及水头损失变化规律[J].中国给水排水,2014,30(11):14-18.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 476
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 19
- 被引次数: 0