EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFECT IN HAIHE RIVER BASIN IN HENAN PROVINCE FROM 2015 TO 2018
-
摘要: 分别采用单因子评价法、综合污染指数评价法和模糊综合评价法对2015—2018年河南省辖海河流域的水质改善效果进行评价分析。结果表明:3种方法的评价结果基本一致,2015—2018年河南省辖海河流域整体水质呈现改善趋势。但各方法侧重点有所不同。单因子评价结果显示,海河流域21项污染因子Ⅰ—Ⅲ类数量占比由2015年的69.63%增加至2018年的89.52%,劣Ⅴ类占比由2015年的15.13%减少至2018年的0.85%;海河流域综合污染指数由2015年的0.89降低至2018年的0.56,水质级别由中度污染改善为轻度污染,其中卫河、共产主义渠、大沙河、安阳河、汤河、马颊河的水质状况均有一定改善;模糊评价结果显示,NH3-N和TP在9项评价因子中权重占比较大,是河南省辖海河流域的主要污染因子;2018年8条河流均达到Ⅰ—Ⅲ类水质。前2种评价方法适用于管理分析,模糊评价法可补充说明河流存在的问题,更适用于研究工作。Abstract: This paper evaluated and analyzed the water quality improvement effect in Haihe River Basin in Henan province during 2015—2018 using single factor evaluation method, comprehensive pollution index evaluation method, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The results showed that the three evaluation methods were basically consistent, and the overall water quality in Haihe River Basin in Henan province showed a trend of improvement in 2015—2018. But the emphasis of each method was different. The results of single factor evaluation showed that the number of category Ⅰ—Ⅲ pollution factors of 21 pollution factors in Haihe River Basin increased from 69.63% in 2015 to 89.52% in 2018, and the number of category inferior Ⅴ pollution factors decreased from 15.13% in 2015 to 0.85% in 2018. The comprehensive pollution index of Haihe Basin in Henan province decreased from 0.89 in 2015 to 0.56 in 2018, and water quality grades were improved from moderate pollution to light pollution. The water quality grades of the eight rivers in 2015 were lower than moderate pollution, including Wei River, Communist Canal, Dasha River, Anyang River, Tang River, Majia River. The results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation showed that the weights of ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus were the largest among the nine evaluation factors, the main pollution factors in Haihe River Basin in Henan province. And the water quality of eight rivers was improved to category Ⅰ—Ⅲ by 2018. Single factor evaluation method, comprehensive pollution index evaluation method were more suitable for management analysis, while fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was prefered in research work.
-
李茜,张建辉,林兰钰,等. 水环境质量评价方法综述[J]. 现代农业科技,2011(19):285-287,290. 王梦. 水环境质量评价中几种方法的比较[J]. 渤海大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(1):34-37. 封丽,张学睿,封雷,等.基于粗糙集的三峡库区支流水质富营养化模糊综合评价模型研究[J]. 环境工程,2015,33(12):105-110. 马太玲,朝伦巴根,高瑞忠,等. 水环境质量综合评价方法的比较研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(4):138-142. 赵颖,王建英,孙燕,等. 水环境质量评价:以河南部分河流断面为例[J]. 环境与发展,2018,30(2):17-18. 黄珍慧. 习近平生态文明思想的制度建设:以"河长制"全面推行为例[J]. 长春市委党校学报,2018(2):23-27. 刘思莹,刘俊文,赵婷婷,等. 水环境质量评价的研究进展[J]. 江西化工,2017(6):41-43. 高学平,孙博闻,訾天亮,等. 基于时域权重矩阵的模糊综合水质评价法及其应用[J]. 环境工程学报,2017,11(2):970-976. 秦雨,王兆波,张正,等. 基于改进的模糊综合评价法的饮马河水质综合评价研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2017,42(3):169-173. 钟文武,王文玉,孙昳,等. 模糊综合评价法在抚仙湖种质资源保护区水质评价中的应用[J]. 水产科学,2015,34(3):182-187. 徐健,吴玮,黄天寅,等. 改进的模糊综合评价法在同里古镇水质评价中的应用[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(2):143-149. 刘聚涛,高俊峰,姜加虎.不同模糊评价方法在水环境质量评价中的应用比较[J]. 环境污染与防治,2010,32(1):20-25. 赵前信. 四种水环境质量评价方法在六安市水库中的应用[J]. 环境工程,2014,32(3):113-116,120.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 117
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0