TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON COD REMOVAL UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR HIGH PROPORTION OF INDUSTRY WASTEWATER
-
摘要: 废水中含有浓度高、成分复杂的溶解性难降解有机物,是目前许多进水中工业废水占比较高的城镇污水处理厂在新一轮提标改造中遇到的难题。以太湖流域4座进水含高比例难降解工业废水的污水处理厂为研究对象,分析水解酸化及多种污水深度处理技术对于化学需氧量(COD)的去除效果。结果表明:水解酸化技术可在一定程度上提高废水的可生化性,且添加填料能够起到促进效果;混凝沉淀、膜过滤两种深度处理技术对于可溶解性难降解COD的去除率仅为30%~35%;臭氧氧化技术对于部分溶解性难降解有机物的矿化能力较差,因此其受进水中有机物种类的影响较大;活性炭对有机物的吸附具有普遍性,去除效果较好,在空床水力停留时间(hydraulic retention time,HRT)为10 min的情况下,活性炭吸附废水中溶解性难降解有机物后,发现出水COD稳定低于20 mg/L,但该工艺运行成本较高,且需考虑活性炭的再生及处置问题。因此COD深度处理工艺的选择应基于进水水质情况,在小试及中试规模试验可行的前提下进行充分的技术论证,并综合考虑建设、运行、占地、高程等因素来选择合适的提标改造技术。Abstract: The dissolved refractory organic compounds with high concentration and complex components in wastewater were the problems encountered by many urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) which occupied a relatively higher proportion of industrial wastewater, in the new round of upgrading. In this paper, four typical wastewater treatment plants in Taihu Basin were taken as the research objects, and the removal efficiency of COD by hydrolysis acidification and various advanced wastewater treatment technologies were analyzed. The results showed that hydrolytic acidification technology could improve the biodegradability of wastewater to a certain extent, and the addition of fillers could improve the effect. Moreover, the removal efficiency of the two advanced treatment technologies, coagulation sedimentation and membrane filtration, was only about 30%~35%. Furthermore, the mineralization ability of the ozone oxidation technology for the partial refractory organics was poor, so this technology was influenced by the organics in the influent. The adsorption of organics by activated carbon was universal, and in this study, the efficiency of adsorption of dissolved refractory organics in wastewater by activated carbon at empty bed hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 10 minutes was studied. It was found the COD of the effluent was stable at less than 20 mg/L. Besides, the operation cost of activated carbon adsorption process was high, and the regeneration and disposal of activated carbon should be considered. Therefore, the selection of COD advanced treatment process should be based on the influent quality, full technical demonstration under the premise of feasibility of small-scale and pilot scale test, and comprehensive consideration of construction, operation, land occupation, elevation and other factors to select the suitable technology for upgrading.
-
Key words:
- industrial wastewater /
- WWTPs /
- refractory COD /
- ozone /
- activated carbon
-
马晔,田金平,陈吕军. 工业园区水管理创新研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2019,11(4):59-66. 张文硕,张婷. 工业化与城镇化的发展历程分析[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2013,12(13):125-126. 冒岩林,牟艳军,翁方芳.浅论工业废水的污染现状及防治措施[C]//浙江省环境科学学会.浙江省环境科学学会2014年学术年会论文集,杭州,2014. 丁淳怡. 某工业废水处理厂综合废水优化处理的研究[D]. 苏州:苏州科技大学,2019. 余杰, 彭应登, 赵淑霞, 等. 工业废水处理升级改造案例分析及其污染管理控制[C]//中华环保联合会.第十届环境与发展论坛论文集,北京,2014. 陈新拓,王照丽,佘佳,等. 城市工业园区污水处理厂优化运维的思考[J]. 环境研究与监测,2019,32(3):28-31. 王健行,魏源送,成宇涛,等. 颗粒活性炭深度处理抗生素废水[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(2):401-410. 王森,李新平,张安龙,等. 膜分离技术深度处理造纸废水的研究[J]. 中国造纸学报,2013,28(2):15-18. 胡洁,王乔,周珉,等. 芬顿和臭氧氧化法深度处理化工废水的对比研究[J]. 四川环境,2015,34(4):23-26. 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002. 王星,初里冰,丁鹏元,等. 微氧水解酸化处理石化废水的生物降解特性[J]. 环境科学学报,2015,35(1):161-167. 黄华山. 微氧水解酸化-复合好氧工艺处理难降解工业废水研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008. SHER F, MALIK A, LIU H. Industrial polymer effluent treatment by chemical coagulation and flocculation[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2013,1(4):684-689. 李德钟,冀雅琬,刘伟,等. 高COD枣加工生产废水预处理实验[J]. 水处理技术,2018,44(4):66-68. 李慧,王开厅,孔祥帅,等. 膜分离技术处理航天废水[J]. 化工进展,2019,38(增刊1):247-251. 程雯,全学军,罗丹,等. 微泡强化臭氧传质及其对产生羟基自由基的影响[J]. 化学反应工程与工艺, 2017,33(5):458-465. 张帆,李菁,谭建华,等. 吸附法处理重金属废水的研究进展[J]. 化工进展,2013,32(11):2749-2756. 孙媛媛. 芦竹活性炭的制备、表征及吸附性能研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2014.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 603
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0