DYNAMIC DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION METHOD OF LAKE WATER ECOLOGICAL HEALTH BASED ON RISK MATRIX AND FIVE ELEMENT SUBTRACTION SET PAIR POTENTIAL
-
摘要: 为判断湖泊水生态健康子系统发展趋势、诊断病态因子,引进了五元减法集对势,建立生态子系统与物理化学子系统的合成矩阵得到湖泊水生态健康状态,从而提出了基于风险矩阵和五元减法集对势的湖泊水生态健康动态诊断评估方法,并应用于安徽省瓦埠湖。结果表明:瓦埠湖水生态健康状态1980—2015年呈变差趋势,2012年为微病态,2015年略有好转。五元减法集对势识别出瓦埠湖水生态健康的病态因子主要有底栖动物、浮游动物、叶绿素、COD、TN、TP和透明度,为改善瓦埠湖水生态健康的重要指标。上述风险矩阵和五元减法集对势耦合的动态诊断评估方法可为湖泊水生态健康评估提供新的思路。Abstract: In order to judge the development trend and diagnose the morbid factors of the lake water ecological health subsystem, the five element subtraction set was introduced, and the composite matrix of the ecosystem and the physical and chemical subsystem was established to get the lake water ecological health status. Thus, the dynamic diagnosis and evaluation method of the lake water ecological health based on the risk matrix and the five element subtraction set was proposed and applied to Wabu lake in Anhui province. The results showed that the water ecological health status of Wabu lake had a trend of deterioration from 1980 to 2015, which was slightly morbid in 2012 and slightly improved in 2015. It was indentified by five element subtraction set pair potential that the pathological factors of water ecological health of Wabu lake mainly included benthos, zooplankton, chlorophyll, COD, TN, TP and transparency. And they were important indicators to improve water ecological health of Wabu lake. The dynamic diagnosis and evaluation method of the coupling of the risk matrix and the five element subtraction set could provide a new idea for lake water ecological health evaluation.
-
中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所. 中国湖泊概论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1989. 黄小龙, 郭艳敏, 万斌,等. 沉水植物恢复对城市富营养化湖泊生态环境影响[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(7):22-26. 赵思琪, 代嫣然, 王飞华, 等. 湖泊生态系统健康综合评价研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(12):104-110. SANA S, BRAHIM O. CyanoHAB occurrence and water irrigation cyanotoxin contamination:ecological impacts and potential health risks[J]. Toxins, 2009, 1(2):113-122. RAPPORT D J.What constitutes ecosystem health[J].Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1989, 33(1):120-132. SCHAEFFER D J, HERRICKS D E, KERSTER H W. Ecosystem health:Ⅰ.measuring ecosystem health[J].Environmental Management, 1988, 12(4):445-455. RYDER R A. Ecosystem health, a human perception-definition, detection and the dichotomous key[J].Journal of Great Lakes Research, 1990, 16(4):619-624. CONSTANZA R, MAGEAU M. What is a healthy ecosystem[J].Aquatic Ecology, 1999, 33(1):105-115. WANG T, YAN J, MA J, et al. A fuzzy comprehensive assessment and hierarchical management system for urban lake health:a case study on the lakes in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2018, 15(12):2617-2633. 薛联青, 朱祎真, 王思琪,等. 基于投影寻踪的湖泊生态健康评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(2):76-81. 吴易雯, 李莹杰, 张列宇, 等. 基于主客观赋权模糊综合评价法的湖泊水生态系统健康评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(5):1091-1102. 胡晓雪,杨晓华,郦建强, 等. 河流健康系统评价的集对分析模型[J].系统工程理论与实践2008,28(5):164-170. 吴计生, 吕军, 刘洪超, 等. 松花湖生态健康评估[J]. 中国水土保持, 2019, 40(9):65-67. 金菊良, 沈时兴, 郦建强, 等. 基于联系数的区域水资源承载力评价与诊断分析方法[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(1):1-9. 金菊良, 陈磊, 陈梦璐, 等. 基于集对分析和风险矩阵的水资源承载力评价方法[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(7):35-41. 董涛, 金菊良, 王振龙, 等. 基于风险矩阵的区域农业旱灾风险链式传递评估方法[J]. 灾害学, 2019, 34(3):227-234. 阮欣, 尹志逸, 陈艾荣. 风险矩阵评估方法研究与工程应用综述[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 41(3):381-385. 金菊良, 陈鹏飞, 张浩宇, 等. 五元减法集对势及其在水资源承载力趋势分析中的应用[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(1):1-7. 金菊良, 吴开亚, 魏一鸣. 基于联系数的流域水安全评价模型[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(4):401-409. 陈守煜. 水资源与防洪系统可变模糊集理论与方法[M]. 大连:大连理工大学出版社, 2005. 赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用[M]. 杭州:浙江科技出版社, 2000. 熊文,孙晓玉,黄羽.城市静态小水体生态修复措施与生态服务价值评估研究[J].水生态学杂志,2020,41(2):29-35. 张乐,徐慧.宁夏人工河道典农河的健康状态评价[J].水生态学杂志,2020,41(2):16-22. 丁继, 刘洋,樊胜岳.以公共价值为基础的洱海流域水环境治理项目绩效评价[J].水生态学杂志,2020,41(2):1-7. 杨莹, 侯凯旋, 岳卫峰,等.基于复合系统相互作用关系的水资源承载力研究:以巩义市为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(5):669-676. 任家慧, 位贺杰, 徐子涵,等. 基于氮元素的水库生态系统服务需求评估[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(3):395-400. 李凯. 瓦埠湖流域水环境评价与水生态健康评估[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2017.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 230
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0