APPLICATION OF ULTRAFINE BUBBLE OXYGEN ENRICHMENT AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVATION TECHNOLOGY IN BLACK AND ODOROUS WATER TREATMENT
-
摘要: 针对当前黑臭河道治理工作中出现的黑臭反复,长效性难保持问题,以某内源污染严重的重度黑臭河道为例实施原位生态修复。第1阶段采用超微气泡富氧(移动式曝气船+定点式曝气设备)和生物活化技术进行水体和底质修复,削减内源污染,改善生境;第2阶段应用定点式曝气设备、生态浮岛、水生植物净化、水生动物多样性调控进行生态修复,营造健康稳定的生态系统。经过近4个月的治理,治理区水质由重度黑臭稳定达到GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅴ类水标准,水体COD、NH3-N和TP含量分别为28.79,0.36,0.19 mg/L,去除率分别达到45%、98%和85%以上,治理后水体澄清,可见多种水生动物和沉水植物,河道底质呈现自然泥土色泽,在未进行清淤处理的情况下即达到了泥水共治的效果,水环境质量得到显著提升,实现了长效治理。Abstract: In view of the difficulties in long-term maintenance of the treatment effect of black odorous river and the problem of black and odorous repeatedly, an in-situ ecological restoration was carried out in a seriously polluted black odorous river course with severe internal pollution. In the first stage, ultrafine bubble oxygen enrichment (mobile aerator+fixed point aerator) and biological activation technology were used to restore water and sediment, reduce endogenesis pollution and improve living environment; in the second stage, the fixed point aerator, ecological floating island, purification of aquatic plants and diversity regulation of aquatic animals were applied, to restore and create a healthy and stable ecosystem. After nearly 4 months’ treatment, the water quality in the treated area stabilized from severe black odor to the surface V water standard, and the contents of COD, NH3-N and TP were 28.79, 0.36 and 0.19 mg/L, and the removal rates reached 45%, 98% and 85% respectively. After the treatment, the water was clarified and a variety of aquatic animals and submerged plants were visible. The channel sediment had a natural earthy color. The mud-water co-treatment effect was achieved without dredging treatment. The quality of the water environment was significantly improved and long-term governance aim was achieved.
-
马圣玥, 李明柱, 朱佳. 南方城市典型黑臭河流治理后水质调查及水质反复原因分析[J].绿色科技, 2019(16):117-119,125. 黄燕莹. 黑臭河道何以履治难清:以南京市J河为例[J]. 四川环境, 2019, 38(5):102-106. 李永新, 王威, 何妹, 等. 基于连续监测的城市内河返黑返臭机制初探:以南宁市二坑溪为例[J]. 环境科学, 2020,41(5):2257-2263. 包建平, 朱伟, 闵佳华. 中小河道治理中的清淤及淤泥处理技术[J].水资源保护, 2015,35(1):56-62. 房斌, 张松, 江月. 黑臭河道治理工程中增氧方式的研究进展[J].科学技术创新, 2019(21):136-138. 栗勇田, 赵明杰, 刘雪妮, 等. 河北某湖泊黑臭水体治理及水质提升工程实例[J]. 水处理技术, 2019,45(6):131-133. 陈丽娜, 黄志心, 白健豪, 等. 微纳米曝气-微生物活化技术在黑臭水体治理中的应用[J]. 给水排水, 2019, 45(12):18-2. 胡湛波, 刘成, 周权能, 等. 曝气对生物促生剂修复城市黑臭河道水体的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(12):4281-4288. 刘晓伟, 谢丹平, 李开明, 等. 投加生物促生剂对底泥微生物群落及氮磷的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(增刊1):87-92. VEZZULLI L, PRUZZO C, FABIANO M. Response of the bacterial community to in situ bioremediation of organic-rich sediments[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2004,49(9):740-751. 燕琛. 泥水界面氧含量对沉积物/水体净化效能与机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. 王美丽, 刘春, 何连生, 等. 曝气深度对河道底泥特性及水质的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(6):2909-2914. 住房和城乡建设部, 生态环境部(原环境保护部). 城市黑臭水体整治工作指南[Z]. 2015. 陆晖, 胡湛波, 蒋哲, 等. 微纳米曝气技术对城市景观水体修复的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(4):1755-1760. 李大鹏, 黄勇, 李伟光. 底泥曝气改善城市河流水质的研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2007, 23(5):22-25. 孙井梅, 刘晓朵, 汤茵琪. 微生物-生物促生剂协同修复河道底泥[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(1):351-357. 张秀芝, 邱金泉, 陈进斌, 等. 固体生物促生剂净化河道水体的效果研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(增刊1):196-199. 徐亚同, 徐祖信, 李小平, 等. 河流污染状况及治理效果评价的指标体系[J]. 净水技术, 2007, 26(4):1-3. 段余杰, 刘小宁, 陈光耀, 等. 底泥再悬浮对上覆水水质的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(5):837-842. 刘晓朵, 孙井梅, 汤茵琪, 等. 促生剂投量对菌剂-促生剂协同修复沉积物的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(6):1825-1833. 陈倩茹, 张霞, 王川, 等. 微生物促生剂在沉积物修复中的作用机理及应用现状[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2020,41(2):122-130. 冯强, 易境, 刘书敏, 等. 城市黑臭水体污染现状、治理技术与对策[J]. 环境工程, 2019,38(8):85-91.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 279
- HTML全文浏览量: 28
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0