LNA和HNA细菌在反硝化过程中的迁移特征分析

张双双; 李志华; 贝源; 杨成建

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202011013

LNA和HNA细菌在反硝化过程中的迁移特征分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011013

张双双^1,2,
李志华^1,2, ,,
贝源^1,2,
杨成建^1,2

1. 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室, 西安 710055;
2. 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院陕西省环境工程重点实验室, 西安 710055

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（5187839）；陕西省重点研发计划项目（2018ZDXM-SF-025）；陕西省水利科技项目（2017slkj-10）；西安市科技计划项目（2016063SF/SF09）。

详细信息

作者简介:
张双双(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水处理理论与技术。ss.zhang197@foxmail.com

通讯作者:
李志华(1976-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为废水生物处理理论与技术。lizhihua@xauat.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 169
- HTML全文浏览量: 23
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-02-13
- 网络出版日期: 2021-04-23
- 刊出日期: 2021-04-23

SHUTTLE CHARACTERISTICS OF LNA AND HNA BACTERIA DURING DENITRIFICATION PROCESS

1. Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resource, Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;
2. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

摘要

摘要: 低核酸（low nucleic acid，LNA）和高核酸（high nucleic acid，HNA）细菌在不同环境条件下表现出不同特性，当前尚不清楚反硝化过程对细菌的影响。为此，通过对不同反硝化条件下游离态的LNA和HNA细菌沿程变化情况及相关细菌群基因测序分析，发现游离菌在反硝化过程中会快速增多，且反硝化速率越大，增速越高。结果显示：反硝化时LNA细菌比HNA细菌更快脱离污泥絮体，只有在反硝化达到一定程度，使絮体结构疏松甚至破碎时HNA细菌才会表现出快速增多，由此推测低核酸（LNA）细菌位于污泥表面或者填充于絮体之间，而高核酸（HNA）细菌是污泥絮体的骨架部分。淀粉在反硝化时会因其网捕作用使游离菌减少，但乙酸钠的反硝化作用比淀粉的网捕作用对游离菌的影响更为显著。同时HNA细菌具有较高的丰度和多样性，是主要功能菌，而LNA细菌对反硝化反应能做出更快的响应，可作为反硝化启动的指示参数。
- LNA细菌 /
- HNA细菌 /
- 游离菌 /
- 活性污泥 /
- 反硝化 /
- 絮体结构
Abstract: Low nucleic acid (LNA) and high nucleic acid (HNA) bacteria show different characteristics under different environmental conditions, and the effect of denitrification process on bacteria is still unclear. The variations of free-swimming LNA and HNA bacteria under different denitrification conditions and microbial community were thus investigated in this study, it was found that free-swimming bacteria increased rapidly during the denitrification process, and greater the denitrification rate resulted in a higher increase of free-swimming bacteria. It was evidenced that LNA bacteria moved faster than HNA bacteria at the beginning of the denitrification reaction. HNA bacteria showed a rapid increase, either the denitrification reached a certain level, or the floc structure loose or break, indicating that LNA bacteria was mainly on the surface of flocs and functioned as glue, or filling materials of the pores of flocs. HNA bacteria functioned as a backbone of flocs. When starch was used as the carbon source for denitrification, free-swimming bacteria were reduced due to the bridge-capture of starch. However the denitrification of sodium acetate had a more significant effect on free-swimming bacteria than the bridge-capture of starch. In addition, HNA bacteria had higher abundance and diversity than LNA bacteria, and was found out as the main functional bacteria. LNA bacteria can respond faster to denitrification and be used as a signal for denitrification initiation.
- low nucleic acid bacteria (LNA) /
- high nucleic acid bacteria (HNA) /
- free-swimming bacteria /
- activated sludge /
- denitrification /
- floc structure

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

VILA C M, GASOL J M, SHARMA S, et al. Community analysis of high-and low-nucleic acid-containing bacteria in NW Mediterranean coastal waters using 16S rDNA pyrosequencing[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 14(6):1390-1402.

WANG Y, HAMMES F, BOON N, et al. Isolation and characterization of low nucleic acid (LNA)-conetnt bacteria[J]. The ISME Journal, 2009, 3(8):889-902.

SONG Y H, WANG Y F, MAO G N, et al. Impact of planktonic low nucleic acid-content bacteria to bacterial community structure and associated ecological functions in a shallow lake[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 658:868-878.

LACOSTE É, PIOT A, ARCHAMBAULT P, et al. Bioturbation activity of three macrofaunal species and the presence of meiofauna affect the abundance and composition of benthic bacterial communities[J]. Marine Environmental Research, 2018, 136:62-70.

LONGNECKER K, SHERR B, SHERR E. Variation in cell-specific rates of leucine and thymidine incorporation by marine bacteria with high and with low nucleic acid content of the Oregon coast[J]. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2006, 43(2):113-125.

RAMSEIER M K, GUNTEN U, FREIHOFER P, et al. Kinetics of membrane damage to high (HNA) and low (LNA) nucleic acid bacterial clusters in drinking water by ozone, chlorine, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, ferrate (Ⅵ), and permanganate[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(3):1490-1500.

MAO G N, SONG Y H, BARTLAM M, et al. Long-term effects of residual chlorine on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated drinking water fed with low AOC medium[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9:879.

PAN Z L, ZHOU J, LIN Z Y, et al. Effects of COD/TN ratio on nitrogen removal efficiency, microbial community for high saline wastewater treatment based on heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 301:122726.

HOLMAN J, WAREHAM D. COD, ammonia and dissolved oxygen time profiles in the simultaneous nitrification/denitrification process[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 22(2):125-133.

FOGLAR L, BRIŠKI F. Wastewater denitrification process-the influence of methanol and kinetic analysis[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2003, 39(1):95-103.

CARLA C, ANNALISA O H, IBRAHIM E S, et al. Implication of using different carbon sources for denitrification in wastewater treatments[J]. Water Environment Research, 2009, 81(8):788-799.

郑志佳, 吴迪, 张晶晶,等. 两级后置纯膜MBBR的反硝化性能研究[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(9):68-73.

XU Z S, DAI X H, CHAI X L. Effect of different carbon sources on denitrification performance, microbial community structure and denitrification genes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:195-204.

FEDERATION W E, Association A P H. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater[M]. American Public Health Association (APHA):Washington, DC, 2005.

ZOU J T, PAN J A, WU S Y, et al. Rapid control of activated sludge bulking and simultaneous acceleration of aerobic granulation by adding intact aerobic granular sludge[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 674:105-113.

TANG P, YU D S, CHEN G H, et al. Novel aerobic granular sludge culture strategy:using granular sludge Anammox process effluent as a biocatalyst[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 294:122156.

郭耀, 李志华, 杨成建, 等. 活性污泥物理结构对呼吸过程的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(6):323-330.

YANG Q X, ZHAO H L, DU B B. Bacteria and bacteriophage communities in bulking and non-bulking activated sludge in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment systems[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 119:101-111.

FUKUSHIMA T, WHANG L M, CHEN P C, et al. Linking TFT-LCD wastewater treatment performance to microbial population abundance of Hyphomicrobium and Thiobacillus spp[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 141:131-137.

GUO J, CHENG J P, LI B B, et al. Performance and microbial community in the biocathode of microbial fuel cells under different dissolved oxygen concentrations[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 833:433-440.

WANG J, LI Q, QI R, et al. Sludge bulking impact on relevant bacterial populations in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2014, 49(12):2258-2265.

WANG D P, LI T, HUANG K L, et al. Roles and correlations of functional bacteria and genes in the start-up of simultaneous anammox and denitrification system for enhanced nitrogen removal[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 655:1355-1363.

MARQUES R, RIBERA-GUARDIA A, SANTOS J, et al. Denitrifying capabilities of Tetrasphaera and their contribution towards nitrous oxide production in enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes[J]. Water Research, 2018, 137:262-272.

ZHANG X X, LI A, SZEWZYK U, et al. Improvement of biological nitrogen removal with nitrate-dependent Fe (Ⅱ) oxidation bacterium Aquabacterium parvum B6 in an up-flow bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 219:624-631.

CHEN C M, MING J, YOZA B A, et al. Characterization of aerobic granular sludge used for the treatment of petroleum wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 271:353-359.

GU Y Q, LI T T, LI H Q. Biofilm formation monitored by confocal laser scanning microscopy during startup of MBBR operated under different intermittent aeration modes[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2018, 74:132-140.

MULLA S I, HU A Y, WANG Y W, et al. Degradation of triclocarban by a triclosan-degrading Sphingomonas sp. strain YL-JM2C[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144:292-296.

SONG G Q, YU Y, LIU T, et al. Performance of microaeration hydrolytic acidification process in the pretreatment of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 369:465-473.

MA S J, MA H J, HU H D, et al. Effect of mixing intensity on hydrolysis and acidification of sewage sludge in two-stage anaerobic digestion:characteristics of dissolved organic matter and the key microorganisms[J]. Water Research, 2019, 148:359-367.

ZHANG L, LEHMANN K, TOTSCHE K U, et al. Selective successional transport of bacterial populations from rooted agricultural topsoil to deeper layers upon extreme precipitation events[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124:168-178.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计