ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION
-
摘要: 为科学合理地评价农用地土壤健康风险,基于USEPA的环境风险评价体系,针对我国农用地土壤污染特征,建立农用地土壤健康风险评价模型,并引入蒙特卡罗模拟降低风险评价结果的不确定性。区域农用地土壤重金属的健康风险评价结果表明,该农用地造成的总致癌风险CR服从对数正态分布,为(2.898±2.425)×10-4,总危害指数HQ服从对数正态分布,为15.775±13.797;确定土壤的优先控制污染物为As,优先控制暴露途径为经口摄入。该模型适用于农用地多项污染物对人体的健康风险评价,并能得到优先控制因子和优先控制暴露途径等关键信息。Abstract: In order to scientifically and reasonably assess the soil health risks of agricultural land, based on the environmental risk assessment system of the US Environmental Protection Agency, this paper established a soil health risk assessment model for agricultural land use in China. Monte Carlo simulations were also introduced to reduce the uncertainty of risk assessment results. The health risk assessment results of heavy metals in regional agricultural land soils showed that the total carcinogenic risk CR caused by the agricultural land obeyed a log-normal distribution, which was (2.898±2.425)×10-4, and the total hazard index HQ obeyed a log-normal distribution, which was 15.775±13.797, the priority soil control pollutant was determined to be As, and the priority control exposure route was oral route. The model was applicable to the evaluation of human health risks by multiple pollutants in agricultural land, and could obtain key information such as priority control factors and priority control for exposure routes.
-
Key words:
- agricultural land /
- health risk assessment /
- Monte Carlo simulation /
- heavy metal /
- arsenic
-
[1] 尹国庆,江宏,王强,等.安徽省典型区农用地土壤重金属污染成因及特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(1):96-104. [2] 王玉军,吴同亮,周东美,等.农田土壤重金属污染评价研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(12):2365-2378. [3] 秦旭芝,郑涵文,苏荣,等.洪水淹没对矿区下游农用地土壤重金属污染特征的影响[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(12):4242-4250. [4] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 污染场地风险评估技术导则HJ 25.3-2014[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2014. [5] USEPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. volume 1, human health evaluation manual. Part A[R]. Washington DC, 1990. [6] HASAN B, MURAT S, EMRE G, et al. A case study on pollution and a human health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils around Sinop province, Turkey[J]. Chemosphere, 2020,241:125015. [7] YANG Q Q, LI Z Y, LU X N, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China:Pollution and risk assessment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642:690-700. [8] MOBAROK H, PULAK K P. Contamination zoning and health risk assessment of trace elements in groundwater through geostatistical modelling[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 189:110038. [9] JIANG H H, CAI L M, WEN H H, et al. An integrated approach to quantifying ecological and human health risks from different sources of soil heavy metals[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701:134466. [10] ZHAO R, GUAN Q Y, LUO H P, et al. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation and health risk assessment quantification of heavy metals in Zhangye agricultural soil from the perspective of sources[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 697:134126. [11] 王月,安达,席北斗,等.基于正态随机模拟的武烈河环境健康风险评价[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(5):3334-3340. [12] 环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2014:87-799. [13] 王积才,张朝,谢雨呈,等.重金属污染场地土壤风险筛选值关键影响因子研究:以砷为例[J].生态毒理学报,2018,13(6):175-185. [14] 王晓钰,李飞.农用土壤重金属多受体健康风险评价模型及实例应用[J].环境工程,2014,32(1):120-125. [15] 佟瑞鹏,杨校毅.基于蒙特卡罗模拟的土壤环境健康风险评价:以PAHs为例[J].环境科学,2017,38(6):2522-2529. [16] 杨杰,刘茂,李敏嫣.基于蒙特卡罗的垃圾焚烧产生二噁英健康风险评估[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(4):234-238. [17] 贺莉萍. 基于GIS和风险评估模型对矿区农用地土壤重金属污染和学龄儿童健康的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2018. [18] 杨涛. 赣南钨矿区农田土壤重金属污染特征及风险评价[D]. 赣州:江西理工大学,2016. [19] 刘丹,赵永红,周丹,等.赣南某钨矿区土壤重金属污染生态风险评价[J].环境化学,2017,36(7):1556-1567. [20] 陈明,杨涛,李登宇,等.赣南某钨矿区稻田土壤中重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].有色金属工程,2016,6(2):89-95. [21] 赵永红,张静,周丹,等.赣南某钨矿区土壤重金属污染状况研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(8):2477-2484. [22] 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018. [23] 黄国勤.江西省土壤重金属污染研究Ⅲ.不同类型和深度土壤重金属污染状况[C].中国环境科学学会学术年会, 2015:4308-4316. [24] USEPA. Integrated Risk Information System[R]. Washington DC, 2013. [25] 王嘉. 铜陵矿区土壤重金属污染现状评价与风险评估[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2010. [26] 张应华,刘志全,李广贺,等.基于不确定性分析的健康环境风险评价[J].环境科学,2007,28(7):1409-1415.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 406
- HTML全文浏览量: 63
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0