右旋糖酐制药废水循环流化产沼气实验

黄如一; 汤萍; 罗涛; 李江; 龙恩深; 梅自力; 孔垂雪

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007

右旋糖酐制药废水循环流化产沼气实验

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007

黄如一^1,2,
汤萍²,
罗涛^1,3,
李江^1,4,
龙恩深⁴,
梅自力¹,
孔垂雪^1, ,

1. 农业农村部沼气科学研究所, 成都 610041;
2. 四川省农村能源办公室, 成都 610041;
3. 加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校畜牧兽医学院, 加利福尼亚戴维斯 CA95616;
4. 四川大学建筑与环境学院, 成都 610065

基金项目:

中国农业科学院科技创新工程（CAAS-ASTIP-2016-BIOMA）；四川省重点研发计划（20ZDYF3255）；国家科技支撑计划（2015BAD21B03）。

详细信息

作者简介:
黄如一(1983-),男,博士,主要研究方向为清洁能源和环境工程。28209443@qq.com

通讯作者:
孔垂雪(1981-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为沼气工程和风险评估。kongchuixue@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 201
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-01-06
- 网络出版日期: 2021-07-19

A CASE STUDY ON BIOGAS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DEXTRAN PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER USING CIRCULATING FLUIDIZATION

1. Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Rural Energy Office of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis CA95616, USA;
4. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

摘要

摘要: 为提升生物制药废水处理效率，以某制药厂的右旋糖酐废水作为主要发酵原料，设计2种不同循环流化的水力搅拌方案，进行653.5 L规模的厌氧消化对比中试试验。1号罐为底部进水高位集中压力出水（单口），4号罐为底部进水高位分散式压力出水（四口）。28 d连续发酵实验表明，1号罐较不搅拌的对照组（0号罐）的产气率和COD去除率分别提升了45%和20%，4号罐则分别提升了58%和24%。研究结论可为指导右旋糖酐废水产气潜能提升设计和进一步机理研究提供借鉴。
- 沼气 /
- 制药废水 /
- 搅拌 /
- 循环流化 /
- 流场形态
Abstract: In this paper, in order to improve the treatment performance, the dextran wastewater from a pharmaceutical factory was used as the main fermentation raw material to carry out biogas production experiments in three 653.5 L anaerobic digesters. Digester I adopted the circulating fluidization hydraulic mixing scheme of a high-position, centralized pressure outlet (single port), and digester IV adopted a high-position, dispersed pressure outlets (four ports). The 28-day continuous fermentation experiment showed that the biogas production and COD removal rate of digester I was increased by 45% from the control group without mixing, and the COD removal rate was increased by 20% from the control group. The biogas production of digester IV was increased by 58%, and the COD removal rate was increased by 24%, from the control group.The research results could provide reference to guide the design of dextran wastewater gas production potential enhancement and further mechanism researches.
- biogas /
- pharmaceutical wastewater /
- mixing /
- circulating fluidization /
- flow pattern

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

[1]	ZHONG Y, CHEN R, ROJAS-SOSSA J P, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of energy crop and agricultural wastes to prepare uniform-format cellulosic feedstock for biorefining[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147(1):1358-1370.
[2]	SHI X Q, LEONG K Y, NG H Y. Anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater:a critical review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 245(Part A):1238-1244.
[3]	VIKLUND S B, LINDKVIST E. Biogas production supported by excess heat:a systems analysis within the food industry[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 91:249-258.
[4]	李芙蓉, 缪礼鸿. 棉浆黑液生物处理工程改造及运行[J]. 环境工程, 2007, 28(3):87-89.
[5]	YU H, DU J, LI J X. Treating bio-pharmaceutical wastewater by hydrolytic-acidification and two-stage contact oxidation[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2005, 23(2):9-10.
[6]	YIN F B, WANG D L, LI Z F, et al. Study on anaerobic digestion treatment of hazardous colistin sulphate contained pharmaceutical sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 177:188-193.
[7]	ZHANG C, YANG H Q, WU D J. Study on the reuse of anaerobic digestion effluent in lactic acid production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 239:118028.
[8]	刘刈, 王智勇, 孔垂雪,等. 沼气发酵过程混合搅拌研究进展[J]. 中国沼气, 2009, 27(3):26-30.
[9]	杨浩, 邓良伟, 刘刈,等. 搅拌对厌氧消化产沼气的影响综述[J]. 中国沼气, 2010, 28(4):3-9.
[10]	黄如一, 冯琳, 郭亭,等. 利用搅拌提升沼气发酵效率的研究进展[J]. 中国沼气, 2017, 35(5):43-49.
[11]	GÓMEZ X, CUETOS M J, CARA J, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes[J]. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(12):2017-2024.
[12]	KARIM K, KLASSON K T, HOFFMANN R, et al. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste:effect of mixing[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(14):1607-1612.
[13]	WU B X. CFD simulation of gas and non-Newtonian fluid two-phase flow in anaerobic digesters[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(13):3861-3874.
[14]	MEISTER M, REZAVAND M, EBNER C, et al. Mixing non-Newtonian flows in anaerobic digesters by impellers and pumped recirculation[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 115:194-203.
[15]	BOROLE A P, KLASSON K T, RIDENOUR W, et al. Methane production in a 100L upflow bioreactor by anaerobic digestion of farm waste[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2006, 129/132(131):887-896.
[16]	冯琳, 郭亭, 赵鑫, 等. 利用CFD工具优化设计沼气工程流场形态的方法研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2018, 36(1):87-93.
[17]	HUANG R Y, MEI Z L, LONG Y, et al. Impact of optimized flow pattern on pollutant removal and biogas production rate using wastewater anaerobic fermentation[J]. Bioresources, 2015, 10(3):48264842.
[18]	WANG J, XUE Q W, GUO T, et al. A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 97:64-73.
[19]	黄如一, 黄正昕, 冉毅, 等. 利用CFD多相流模型优化设计沼气料液搅拌流场的方法研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2019, 37(5):57-63.
[20]	HASHIMOTO A G. Effect of mixing duration and vacuum on methane production rate from beef cattle waste[J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 1982, 24(1):9-23.
[21]	KARIM K, HOFFMANN R, KLASSON T, et al. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste:Waste strength versus impact of mixing[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(16):1771-1781.
[22]	HAIDER M R, ZESHAN, YOUSAF S, et al. Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 190:451-457.
[23]	秦峰. 污泥厌氧消化搅拌技术的中试研究[J]. 给水排水, 1996, 22(2):61-62.
[24]	PANAGIOTIS C, JUHEE S, SEUNG G S, et al. Anaerobic digestion of industrial dairy wastewater and cheese whey:performance of internal circulation bioreactor and laboratory batch test at pH 5-6[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147(1):1-10.
[25]	WEI C, WU H P, KONG Q P, et al. Residual chemical oxygen demand (COD) fractionation in bio-treated coking wastewater integrating solution property characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 246:324-333.
[26]	WEN Y Z, MAO Y F, KANG Z F, et al. Application of an ammonium ion-selective electrode for the real-time measurement of ammonia nitrogen based on pH and temperature compensation[J]. Measurement, 2019, 137:98-101.
[27]	张艳艳, 韩秀丽. 气相色谱法测定沼气中的甲烷[J]. 环境工程, 2010, 28(3):116-117.
[28]	MA S J, MA H J, HU H D, et al. Effect of mixing intensity on hydrolysis and acidification of sewage sludge in two-stage anaerobic digestion:characteristics of dissolved organic matter and the key microorganisms[J]. Water Research, 2019, 148(1):359-367.
[29]	KAWAI M, NAGAO N, KAWASAKI N, et al. Improvement of COD removal by controlling the substrate degradability during the anaerobic digestion of recalcitrant wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 181:838-846.
[30]	HANSEN K H, ANGELIDAKI I, AHRING B K. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure:inhibition by ammonia[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(1):5-12.
[31]	何仕均, 王建龙, 赵璇. 氨氮对厌氧颗粒污泥产甲烷活性的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 45(9):1294-1296.
[32]	于宏兵, 杜军, 李景新. 水解酸化-二段式接触氧化处理生物制药废水[J]. 环境工程, 2005, 23(2):9-10.