表面活性剂-无机电解质-石油烃的匹配性与石油污染土壤清洗性能

王琦; 郭书海; 李刚; 王卅; 牛明芬; 殷智慧

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202103028

表面活性剂-无机电解质-石油烃的匹配性与石油污染土壤清洗性能

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103028

王琦^1,2,3,
郭书海^1,2, ,,
李刚^1,2,
王卅^1,2,
牛明芬⁴,
殷智慧⁴

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
2. 污染土壤生物-物化协同修复技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 沈阳 110016;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
4. 沈阳建筑大学市政与环境工程学院, 沈阳 110168

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC1801900）；中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDA23010400）；辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目（XLYC1802111）。

详细信息

作者简介:
王琦(1994-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为石油污染土壤化学修复。wqzkyu@163.com

通讯作者:
郭书海(1964-),男,博士,研究员,主要研究方向为石油污染控制。shuhaiguo@iae.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 225
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-02-29
- 网络出版日期: 2021-07-19

PETRILEUM CONTAMINATED SOIL CLEANING: SURFACTANT-INORGANIC ELECTROLYTE-PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON MATCHING

WANG Qi^1,2,3,
GUO Shu-hai^{1,2
, ,},
LI Gang^1,2,
WANG Sa^1,2,
NIU Ming-fen⁴,
YIN Zhi-hui⁴

1. Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Contaminated Soil Remediation by Bio-physicochemical Synergistic Process, Shenyang 110016, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China

摘要

摘要: 选择SDBS、SHO、AEO、NP-10共4种表面活性剂，以重质油含量高的老化型石油污染土壤为对象，考察表面活性剂与石油不同族组分的匹配性。基于表面活性剂的分子排列调控机理，将表面活性剂与无机电解质组配，开展油污土壤清洗效果分析和适宜性评价。结果表明：在温度为65 ℃、固液比为1：5、清洗时间1 h时，4种表面活性剂的清洗能力依次为SDBS>SHO>>AEO≈NP-10；选取Na₂CO₃、Na₂SiO₃、NaOH等无机电解质与表面活性剂复配清洗油污土壤，除SDBS以外，SHO、AEO、NP-10的洗脱能力均显著提高，Na₂CO₃、Na₂SiO₃对AEO和NP-10的增效作用更为突出。由于结构差异明显，4种表面活性剂对石油不同组分显示出不同匹配性，再与合适的电解质复配后，脱附性能得到强化。其中，AEO与Na₂SiO₃复配后对饱和烃的洗脱效果最好，洗脱率达到92.97%；AEO与Na₂CO₃复配后对芳香烃的洗脱效果最好，洗脱率达到93.58%。NP-10与Na₂SiO₃复配后，胶质沥青质洗脱率达到83.47%。因此，在油污土壤清洗中，依据石油族组分比例，可通过配制匹配性复合清洗剂来提高洗脱效率。以饱和烃为主的石蜡基油污土壤进行清洗，双组分的AEO+Na₂SiO₃复合药剂对石油类的洗脱率达到89.14%，具有应用前景。
- 石油污染土壤 /
- 表面活性剂 /
- 无机电解质 /
- 化学清洗 /
- 石油族组分
Abstract: Four surfactants, SDBS, SHO, AEO and NP-10, were selected in this study to carry out the cleaning test for the aged petroleum contaminated soil. The study was focused on the compatibility between surfactants and petroleum components. Based on the mechanism of molecular alignment regulation of surfactants, it was designed to compound the surfactants and inorganic salts and explore the cleaning effect and suitability evaluation. The results showed that the elution effect was the best when the temperature was 65℃, the soil-water ratio was 1:5, the time was 60 min, and then the cleaning capacity of the four surfactants was in the sequence of SDBS>SHO>>AEO≈NP-10. Moreover, the inorganic electrolytes, including Na₂CO₃, Na₂SiO₃ and NaOH, were selected for the compound tests. It achieved significant enhanced elution capacities of SHO, AEO, NP-10 when mixed with inorganic electrolytes except SDBS. Among them, AEO and NP-10 were the most prominent by compounding Na₂CO₃ or Na₂SiO₃. Because of the obvious difference in structure, the four surfactants showed different matching capacity for different petroleum components, and the desorption performance was strengthened after compounding with appropriate electrolyte. AEO combined with Na₂SiO₃ had the best elution effect on saturated hydrocarbons, with an elution rate of 92.97%. AEO combined with Na₂CO₃ had the best elution effect on aromatic hydrocarbons, with an elution rate of 93.58%. Moreover, the elution rate of the resin and asphaltene reached 83.47% when compounding NP-10 and Na₂SiO₃. Therefore, according to the proportion of petroleum group components, matching compound agents could be prepared to improve the elution efficiency. For example, in this study, for the aged petroleum contaminated soil mainly containing saturated hydrocarbons, the elution rate of the total petroleum by AEO+Na₂SiO₃ reached 89.14%, showing good prospect of practicality.
- petroleum-contaminated soil /
- surfactant /
- inorganic electrolyte /
- chemical cleaning /
- petroleum group components

HTML全文

参考文献(44)

[1]	XU Y J, ZHANG Y D, LIU X F, et al. Retrieving oil and recycling surfactant in surfactant-enhanced soilwashing[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6:4981-4986.
[2]	勾立争, 刘长波, 刘诗诚, 等. 热脱附法修复多环芳烃和汞复合污染土壤实验研究[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(2):184-187 ,146.
[3]	JING G L, CHEN T T, LUAN M M. Studying oily sludge treatment by thermo chemistry[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2016, 9:457-460.
[4]	祝红, 张焕祯, 毕璐莎, 等. 表面活性剂修复石油类污染土壤研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(增刊):1012-1015.
[5]	王飞飞, 杨鹏辉, 鱼涛, 等. 含油污泥催化热解工艺的优化及热解产物分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(9):171-176 ,204.
[6]	黄昭露, 陈泉源. 五种表面活性剂对柴油污染土壤清洗效果的比较[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(2):168-172.
[7]	KARTHICK A, ROY B, CHATTOPDHYAY. A review on the application of chemical surfactant and surfactant foam for remediation of petroleum oil contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 243:187-205.
[8]	LI Y F, WANG M X, SUN D J, et al. Effective removal of emulsified oil from oily wastewater using surfactant-modified sepiolite[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2018, 157:227-236.
[9]	HU G J, LI J B, ZENG G M. Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry:A review[J]. Journal of Hazardous materials, 2013, 261:470-490.
[10]	LI H L, QU R H, HAN X M, et al. Surfactant-enhanced washing of aged PAH contaminated soils:Comparison between nonionic surfactant and anionic surfactant[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols, 2014, 522/524:316-321.
[11]	CHENG M, ZENG G G, HUANG D L, et al. Advantages and challenges of Tween 80 surfactant-enhanced technologies for the remediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic compounds[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 314:98-113.
[12]	刘元元. 复合表面活性剂对石油烃污染土壤增溶修复试验研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2018.
[13]	卢媛, 马小东, 孙红文, 等. 表面活性剂清洗处理重度石油污染土壤[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009,3(8):1483-1487.
[14]	马浩, 刘元元, 肖文燕, 等. 表面活性剂CMC对石油烃污染土壤的增溶[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12):7333-7338.
[15]	黄昭露, 陈泉源, 周娟, 等. 钠盐类型对表面活性剂清洗煤油污染土壤的强化效应[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(5):1849-1855.
[16]	VERONIKA J S, SHARON C G, JORIS J H, et al. Transport potential of super-hydrophobic organic contaminants in anionic-nonionic surfactant mixture micelles[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 230:173-181.
[17]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1999:12-14.
[18]	王如刚, 王敏, 牛晓伟. 超声-索氏萃取-重量法测定土壤中总石油烃含量[J]. 分析化学, 2010, 38(3):417-420.
[19]	中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准. SY/T 5119-2008岩石中可溶有机物及原油族组分分析[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2008.
[20]	LOMINCHAR M A, SANTOS A, DE E M, et al. Remediation of aged diesel contaminated soil by alkaline activated persulfate[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, (622/623):41-48.
[21]	宋萌萌, 罗泽娇, 秦佳. 电动力学-过硫酸钠氧化联用修复二氯苯污染土壤的研究[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(7):176-180 ,109.
[22]	王辉, 吴昊, 孙丽娜, 等. 吐温80对柴油污染老化土壤的洗脱特征及影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(5):3239-3243.
[23]	朱友益, 沈平平, 曲景奎, 等. 三次采油用烷基苯磺酸盐结构与性能的关系研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(增刊1):9-12.
[24]	LI Y F, WANG M X, SUN D J, et al. Effective removal of emulsified oil from oily wastewater using surfactant-modified sepiolite[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2018, 157:227-236.
[25]	JIN Y Q, ZHENG X Y, CHU X L, et al. Oil Recovery from Oil Sludge through Combined Ultrasound and Thermochemical Cleaning Treatment[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51:9213-9217.
[26]	张伟娜. 土壤中石油类污染物的物化去除及机理研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2014.
[27]	HAN M, JI G D, NI J R. Washing of field weathered crude oil contaminated soil with an environmentally compatible surfactant, alkyl polyglucoside[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 76:579-586.
[28]	梁宏宝, 刘福生, 陈博, 等. 含油污泥热化学清洗剂的研制与清洗效果实验分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(11):6117-6123.
[29]	WU G Z, HE L, CHEN D Y. Sorption and distribution of asphaltene, resin, aromatic and saturate fractions of heavy crude oil on quartz surface:molecular dynamic simulation[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 92:1465-1471.
[30]	CHEN T, SUN C X. Polychlorinated biphenyls-contaminated soil washing with mixed surfactants enhanced by electrokinetics[J]. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2016, 32(2):261-267.
[31]	肖楠, 朱玲, 王春雨, 等. 含油污泥化学清洗处理实验研究与工艺参数优化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(5):1202-1208.
[32]	BAJAGAIN R, PARK Y, Jeong S W. Feasibility of oxidation-biodegradation serial foam spraying for total petroleum hydrocarbon removal without soil disturbance[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 626:1236-1242.
[33]	HE L, LIN F, LI X G, et al. Interfacial sciences in unconventional petroleum production:from fundamentals to applications[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44:5446-5494.
[34]	WANG M X, ZHANG B, LI G R, et al. Efficient remediation of crude oil-contaminated soil using a solvent/surfactant system[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9:2402-2411.
[35]	TRELLU C, GANZENKO O, PAPIRIO S, et al. Combination of anodic oxidation and biological treatment for the removal of phenanthrene and Tween 80 from soil washing solution[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 306:588-596.
[36]	WEI Y F, LIANG X J, LIN W J, et al. Clay mineral dependent desorption of pyrene from soils by single and mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 264:807-814.
[37]	XIONG X. Study on adsorption mechanism of anionic surfactant SDBS in soil[C]//中国土壤学会土壤环境专业委员会第二十次会议暨农田土壤污染与修复研讨会摘要集, 2018:168.
[38]	LOPEZ-VIZCAINO R, SAEZ C, CANIZARES P, et al. The use of a combined process of surfactant-aided soil washing and coagulation for PAH-contaminated soils treatment[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 88:46-51.
[39]	李一川, 王栋, 王宇, 等. 热化学清洗法洗涤油泥-回收石油的工艺条件研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2008,30(3):39-42.
[40]	郭利果, 苏荣国, 梁生康, 等. 鼠李糖脂生物表面活性剂对多环芳烃的增溶作用[J]. 环境化学, 2009, 28(4):510-514.
[41]	LEE J, YANG J S, KIM H J, et al. Simultaneous removal of organic and inorganic contaminants by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactant[J]. Desalination, 2005, 184:395-407.
[42]	胡金选, 郭书海, 李刚, 等. 含油污泥中不同族组分的脱附特性研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(6):30-33.
[43]	ROSAS J M, VICENTE F, SANTOS A, et al. Soil remediation using soil washing followed by Fenton oxidation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 220:125-132.
[44]	LI G, GUO S H, HU J X. The influence of clay minerals and surfactants on hydrocarbon removal during the washing of petroleum-contaminated soil[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 286:191-197.