SWAT模型下“十三五”中期污染减排措施及气象条件对岷江流域水环境改善贡献

刘骞; 王维; 罗彬; 王康

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105007

SWAT模型下“十三五”中期污染减排措施及气象条件对岷江流域水环境改善贡献

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105007

刘骞¹,
王维^1, ,,
罗彬¹,
王康²

1. 四川省环境政策研究与规划院, 成都 610041;
2. 武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室, 武汉 430072

基金项目:

四川省生态环境厅支撑项目"岷江流域<水污染防治行动计划>实施成效评估研究"。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘骞(1992-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为水生态环境保护规划及水污染防治。klmylq0426@sina.com

通讯作者:
王维(1983-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为水生态环境保护规划、管理及水污染防治。wangvw945@outlook.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 139
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-05-07
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-17

CONTRIBUTION OF POLLUTION REDUCTION MEASURES AND METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS TO IMPROVEMENT OF WATER ENVIRONMENT OF THE MINJIANG RIVER BASIN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 13TH FIVE-YEAR PLAN BASED ON SWAT MODEL

LIU Qian¹,
WANG Wei^{1
, ,},
LUO Bin¹,
WANG Kang²

1. Sichuan Academy of Environmental Policy and Planning, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

摘要

摘要: 基于SWAT构建了岷江流域分布式水文和污染负荷模型，模拟水文变化过程的效率系数超过0.6，模拟污染物浓度的效率系数超过0.5，能够有效模拟岷江流域2015-2018年的水文、污染浓度和通量变化过程。通过模型计算分析了岷江流域主要污染物排放量变化、《水污染防治行动计划》不同减排措施及气象驱动条件对岷江流域水环境改善贡献。结果表明：岷江流域11个国考断面COD、NH₃-N、TP排放量分别下降8%、13%和12%，其中8个考核断面废水排放量上升，主要污染物排放量降低，其中点源强度下降，密度上升；岷江流域中段排放强度高、减排量同样凸显，成都市对岷江出境断面污染物排放及减排贡献均高于眉山市；各项减排措施中，城镇生活污染治理对污染物减排及通量降低占主导作用，对COD_Mn、NH₃-N、TP通量减排分别贡献53%、71%、81%；生活源减排贡献大于工业源减排，点源减排贡献率大于面源污染减排；污染减排措施对凉姜沟断面COD_Mn、NH₃-N和TP浓度变化的贡献率分别为20.7%、26.8%和34.4%。
- SWAT /
- 污染减排措施 /
- 气象条件 /
- 改善贡献 /
- 岷江流域
Abstract: The distributed hydrological and pollution load model for the Minjiang River Basin was constructed based on SWAT. The Nash-Sutcliffe of simulated hydrological transformation processes exceeded 0.6 and Nash-Sutcliffe of simulated pollutant concentrations exceeded 0.5, which could effectively simulate the hydrological, concentration and flux transformation processes of the Minjiang River Basin from 2015 to 2018. The changes of the main pollutant discharge, the different emission reduction measures of Water Pollution Prevention Action Plan and the meteorological driving conditions contributed to the improvement of the water environment in the Minjiang River Basin were calculated. The results showed that COD_Mn, NH₃, and total TP emissions of 11 national examination sections of the Minjiang River Basin decreased by 8%, 13%, and 12% in 2018, the discharge of wastewater in 8 national examination sections increased, and the discharge of major pollutants decreased simultaneously. The intensity of point sources decreased, but the density increased. The emission intensity in the middle of the Minjiang River Basin was high, and the amount of emission reduction was also prominent. The emission and reduction of pollutants of Chengdu were higher than Meishan at Liangjianggou section. Among the emission reduction measures, urban pollution control played a leading role in reducing pollutant emissions, contributing 53%, 71% and 81% of total emission reduction to COD_Mn, NH₃ and TP, namely. The contribution of emission reduction from domestic sources was greater than that from industrial sources, and the contribution rate of the point sources emission reduction was greater than that of the non-point sources. The contribution rate of pollution reduction measures to the COD_Mn, NH₃ and TP in Liangjianggou section were 20.7%, 26.8% and 34.4%, respectively.
- SWAT /
- pollution reduction measures /
- meteorological conditions /
- improvement contribution /
- the Minjiang River Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	翟红娟,王培.岷江流域水资源开发与生态环境保护[J].环境保护,2018,46(9):22-26.
[2]	王刚,齐珺,潘涛,等.北运河流域(北京段)主要污染物减排措施效果评估[J].环境污染与防治,2016,38(6):39-45.
[3]	刘洪延.SWAT模型研究及应用进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2019,31(2):34-37.
[4]	王培. 基于GIS的SWAT模型在农业面源污染模拟中的应用[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2008.
[5]	曹丽娟. 分布式陆面水文过程模式的研究[D].北京:中国气象科学研究院,2004.
[6]	杜强,王东胜.河道的生态功能及水文过程的生态效应[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2005,3(4):287-290.
[7]	SRINIVASAN R,RAMANARAYANAN T S, ARNLD J G,et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part Ⅱ:model application[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association,2010,34(1):91-101.
[8]	MILEWSKI A,SULTAN M,YAN E,et al. A remote sensing solution for estimating runoff and recharge in arid environments[J]. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam),2009,373(1/2):1-14.
[9]	付意成,臧文斌,董飞,等.基于SWAT模型的浑太河流域农业面源污染物产生量估算[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(8):1-8.
[10]	赵雪松.SWAT模型在营口地区农业面源污染模拟中的应用研究[J].地下水,2020,42(3):84-85 ,200.
[11]	郭军庭,张志强,王盛萍,等.应用SWAT模型研究潮河流域土地利用和气候变化对径流的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(6):1559-1567.
[12]	KAUSHAL S S, GROFFMAN P M, BAND L E, et al. Tracking nonpoint source nitrogen pollution in human-impacted watersheds[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2011,45(19):8225-8232.
[13]	张同,张承明,夏安全,等.不同分辨率下SWAT模型在大汶河径流模拟中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(8):27-30 ,44.
[14]	冯畅,毛德华,周慧,等.气候变化对涟水流域蓝水绿水资源的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(10):1525-1537.
[15]	冯斌,李大鹏,周琦,等.基于WASP模型计算尾水回用河道污染负荷[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(10):4196-4202.
[16]	张宝,刘静玲,杨志峰.北京城市水系水环境模拟及情景分析[J].环境工程学报,2011,5(1):16-22.