通风模式对餐厨垃圾生物干化能效及氮素损失的影响

詹亚斌; 魏雨泉; 林永锋; 张阿克; 陶兴玲; 任建国; 沈卫东; 李季

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017

通风模式对餐厨垃圾生物干化能效及氮素损失的影响

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017

1. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193;
2. 中国农业大学有机循环研究院(苏州), 江苏苏州 215100;
3. 苏州市吴中区临湖镇灵湖村村民委员会, 江苏苏州 215106

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFD0800601）；苏州市农业科技创新项目（SNG201903）。

详细信息

作者简介:
詹亚斌(1991-),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为生态工程与有机废弃物处理。zhanyabin@cau.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李季(1965-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为生态工程与有机废弃物处理。liji@cau.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 64
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-08-19
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-17

EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING

1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Organic Recycling Research Institute(Suzhou), China Agricultural University, Suzhou 215100, China;
3. Village Committee of Linghu Village, Linhu Town, Wuzhong District, Suzhou City, Suzhou 215106, China

摘要

摘要: 针对餐厨垃圾生物干化处理周期长、脱水效率低的问题，基于外源辅助加热的生物干化机，比较不同通风模式（温度控制通风设置4个处理：TFWD 45-50、TFWD 50-55、TFWD 55-60、TFWD 60-65；时间控制通风设置2个处理：TFSJ 20、TFSJ 60）对餐厨垃圾生物干化过程系统脱水能效及氮素损失的影响。结果表明：1）与温度控制通风的4个处理相比，时间控制通风的2个处理的总氮（TN）和铵态氮损失较小、发芽指数（GI）较高；2）连续通风TFSJ 60的水分去除效率最低（66.78%），TN和铵态氮损失最小（分别为8.14%、12.96%），腐熟度最高（EC为2.72 mS/cm、GI为75.00%），单位质量水分去除能耗最低（1.10 kW·h/kg）；3）TFWD 50-55的水分去除效率最高（达到99%以上），TN和铵态氮损失最大（分别为16.95%、57.83%），腐熟度较低（EC为4.28 mS/cm、GI为19.58%）、去除单位质量水分的能耗较高（1.74 kW·h/kg）。Pearson相关性分析结果表明：TN、铵态氮与含水率呈显著正相关（P<0.05），与温度、EC、耗电量呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。因此，生物干化后的物料若进行好氧堆肥处理制成有机肥后回归土壤，则建议采用连续通风（TFSJ 60）处理餐厨垃圾；生物干化后的物料若焚烧或者填埋处理，则建议采用温度控制通风（TFWD 50-55）处理餐厨垃圾。研究结果为餐厨垃圾快速生物干化处理通风模式的选择提供了参考。
- 通风 /
- 餐厨垃圾 /
- 生物干化 /
- 能耗 /
- 除水效率 /
- 氮素损失
Abstract: Aiming at the problems of long treatment cycle and low dehydration efficiency of kitchen waste bio-drying, the effects of different aeration modes (groups with aeration controlled by temperature:TFWD 45-50, TFWD 50-55, TFWD 55-60, TFWD 60-65; groups with aeration controlled by time:TFSJ 20, TFSJ 60) on energy consumption, dehydration efficiency and nitrogen loss of kitchen waste biol-drying, on the bio-drying machine with external auxiliary heating, were evaluated. The results showed that:1) compared with the four treatments of aeration controlled by temperature, the two treatments of aeration controlled by time were with less total nitrogen (TN) and ammonium nitrogen losses, and higher germination index (GI); 2) continuous aeration, TFSJ 60, was with the lowest dehydration efficiency (66.78%), lowest TN and ammonium nitrogen losses (8.14% and 12.96%, respectively), highest maturity (EC was 2.72 mS/cm and GI was 75.00%), and the lowest energy consumption per unit of mass dehydration (1.10 kW·h/kg); 3) TFWD 50-55 was with the highest dehydration efficiency (more than 99%), TN and ammonium nitrogen losses (16.95% and 57.83%, respectively), lower maturity (EC was 4.28 mS/cm and GI was 19.58%), and higher energy consumption per unit of mass dehydration (1.74 kW·h/kg). Pearson correlation analysis results showed that TN and ammonium nitrogen were positively correlated with moisture content (P<0.05), and negatively correlated with temperature, EC and energy consumption (P<0.05). Therefore, continuous aeration (TFSJ 60) was recommended for kitchen waste, if the bio-dried materials were treated by aerobic composting to return to the soil; aeration controlled by temperature (TFWD 50-55) was recommended, if the bio-dried materials were to be incinerated or landfilled. This study could provide references for the selection of aeration mode for the treatment of kitchen waste by external auxiliary heating bio-drying machine.
- aeration /
- kitchen waste /
- bio-drying /
- energy consumption /
- dehydration efficiency /
- nitrogen loss

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	施军营,薛方亮,DODA Ada,等.城市餐厨垃圾前处理的工艺优化[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(10):5658-5662.
[2]	袁京,张地方,李赟,等.外加碳源对厨余垃圾生物干化效果的影响[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(2):628-635.
[3]	黄文雄,苏红玉,黄丹丹,等.通风方式对高含水率垃圾生物干化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2012,2(8):1480-1486.
[4]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Bio-drying for mechanical-biological treatment of wastes:A review of process science and engineering[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100:2747-2761.
[5]	余旺,黄绍松,孙水裕,等.接种菌剂和外加能源对污泥生物干化效果的影响[J].环境污染与防治,2012,34(8):39-43.
[6]	BIAN B, SHEN Y, HU X R, et al. Reduction of sludge by a biodrying process:parameter optimization and mechanism[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 248:125970.
[7]	张小娟,黄绍松,孙水裕,等.接种菌剂对城市污泥生物干化过程中干化效果和氮素转化的影响[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(4):1669-1673.
[8]	陈峰,陈丹,胡勇有.垃圾高温好氧生物干化效果的影响因素分析[J].环境工程,2020,8(1):141-145.
[9]	张玉冬,张红玉,顾军,等.通风量对厨余垃圾堆肥过程中H₂S和NH₃排放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,4(7):1371-1377.
[10]	迟孟浩,杨帆,李旺旺,等.厨余垃圾堆肥间歇通风方式的可行性研究[J].环境污染与防治,2018,40(8):917-921 ,942.
[11]	李兵,董志颖,王英.两种供能方式对厨余垃圾好氧堆肥的影响研究[J]. 环境工程,2012,30(5):86-90.
[12]	秦莉,沈玉君,李国学,等.不同C/N比对堆肥腐熟度和含氮气体排放变化的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(12):2668-2673.
[13]	LARNEY F J, HAO X Y. A review of composting as a management alternative for beef cattle feedlot manure in southern Alberta, Canada[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(17):3221-3227.
[14]	陈是吏,袁京,李国学,等.过磷酸钙和双氰胺联用减少污泥堆肥温室气体及NH₃排放[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(6):199-206.
[15]	FREI K M, CAMERON D,Stuart P R. Novel drying process using forced aeration through a porous biomass matrix[J]. Drying Technology,2004,22(5):1191-1215.
[16]	HE Z H, LIN H, HAO J W, et al. Impact of vermiculite on ammonia emissions and organic matter decomposition of food waste during composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 263:548-554.
[17]	杜龙龙,袁京,李国学,等. 通风速率对厨余垃圾堆肥NH₃和H₂S排放及腐熟度的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2015,35(12):3714-3720.
[18]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Production and quality assurance of solid recovered fuels using mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) of waste:a comprehensive assessment[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 40:979-1105.
[19]	何品晶,陈淼,杨娜,等.我国生活垃圾焚烧发电过程中温室气体排放及影响因素:以上海某城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(3):402-407.
[20]	刘洪涛,陈同斌,杭世珺,等.不同污泥处理与处置工艺的碳排放分析[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(17):106-108.
[21]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Biodrying for mechanical-biological treatment of wastes:A review of process science and engineering[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100:2747-2761.