超临界非纯CO<sub>2</sub>输送管道区域人类健康风险评估的QRA概率模型及应用

栗帅; 张一梅; 王维波; 苗芳芳; 赖毓娴; 赵习森; 张志升

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105031

超临界非纯CO₂输送管道区域人类健康风险评估的QRA概率模型及应用

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105031

栗帅^1,2,
张一梅^1,2, ,,
王维波³,
苗芳芳¹,
赖毓娴^1,2,
赵习森³,
张志升⁴

1. 华北电力大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京 102206;
2. 华北电力大学苏州研究院环境修复与功能材料实验室, 江苏苏州 215000;
3. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院, 西安 710065;
4. 延长油田股份有限责任公司, 陕西延安 717400

详细信息

作者简介:
栗帅(1986-),男,助理研究员,主要研究方向为典型污染物危害评估与风险防控。053_lishuai@163.com

通讯作者:
张一梅(1982-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向为环境修复技术及污染风险预控。yimei.zhang1@gmail.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 126
- HTML全文浏览量: 28
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-17

QRA PROBABILITY MODEL FOR HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN SUPERCRITICAL NON-PURE CO₂ PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION AREA AND ITS APPLICATION

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Function Material, Suzhou Research Academy, North China Electric Power University, Suzhou 215000, China;
3. Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group) Co., Ltd, Xi'an 710065, China;
4. Yanchang Oilfield Co., Ltd, Yan'an 717400, China

摘要

摘要: 研究了超临界非纯CO₂热力学参数特征，对非纯CO₂泄漏过程中的动态物理参数进行了解析，应用流体数值模拟分析了不同情况下（风速及泄漏孔径）CO₂扩散规律。将风速v、距离x、泄漏孔径类型及逻辑函数L_v概率分布特征与数值模拟相关结果应用于QRA定量风险评估模型。结合轻微伤害、不可逆伤害与致死3种危害等级对应浓度阈值4%、10%及25%，对超临界非纯CO₂输送管道区域个体3种类型健康风险（HR₁、HR₂、HR₃）进行定量化评估。结果表明：在大孔径泄漏情景下，距离泄漏点200 m范围内个体致死风险，高于可容忍健康风险水平（10^-5），200~350 m内个体致死风险高于可接受健康风险水平（10^-6），个体轻微伤害风险直至距离1850 m才降低至可接受健康风险水平。研究结果可应用于CCUS超临界输送管道路线和设计早期阶段，为探索减轻人群健康风险替代方案提供定量化数据参考。
- 超临界CO₂ /
- 泄漏 /
- 定量 /
- 健康风险评估
Abstract: Characteristics of thermodynamic parameters of supercritical CO₂, and analysis of dynamic physical parameters during non-pure CO₂ leakage, as well as computational fluid dynamics method were conducted to study the diffusion law of CO₂ under different conditions. Wind speed v, distance x, leakage aperture type, probability distribution characteristics of logical functions l_v and relevant results of numerical simulation were applied to the QRA quantitative risk assessment model. Combined with mild injury, irreversible injury and death, three types of health risks (HR₁, HR₂ and HR₃) in supercritical non-pure CO₂ pipeline area were quantitatively evaluated. The results showed that under large aperture leakage scenario, the individual mortality risk within the distance of 200 m from the leakage point was higher than the tolerable level (10^-5); and the individual mortality health risk within 200~350 m was higher than the acceptable level (10^-6), and the individual slight health risk couldn't be reduced to the acceptable level until a distance of 1850 m from the leakage point. The research results could be applied to the route and early design stage of CCUS supercritical pipeline, and provided quantitative data support for exploring alternatives to reduce population health risk.
- supercritical CO₂ /
- leakage /
- quantification /
- health risk assessment

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	刘建武.CO₂输送管道工程设计的关键问题[J]. 油气储运, 2014, 33(4):369-373.
[2]	吴鹏, 史海疆. "再电气化"背景下节能减排路径思考[J]. 电气时代, 2019, 448(1):39-40.
[3]	刘冬梅, 陈颖, 李瑶, 等. 中国碳捕集、利用与封存项目环境影响评估技术建议[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(4):106-109.
[4]	刘敏. 超临界CO₂管道输送瞬变特性研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学,2015.
[5]	JOHN J. Toxicity of CO₂:implications for lateral line studies[J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A Sensory Neural & Behavioral Physiology, 2000, 186(10):957-960.
[6]	罗艾民, 陈平, 多英全,等. 定量风险评估(QRA)中的危险辨识方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2010, 6(1):54-57.
[7]	CURTIS M O. Geologic Carbon Sequestration:Sustainability and Environmental Risk[M]. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, 2012, 4119-4133.
[8]	PRUESS K. Numerical studies of CO₂ leakage from geologic storage reservoirs[J]. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2005.
[9]	李晓春. 高浓度二氧化碳对鼠类的影响实验研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2015.
[10]	ELISABETTA A, ENRICA R, PAOLO C. On diffusion, oxidation and condensation phenomena at the liquid metal-gas interface[J]. Materials Chemistry & Physics, 2009, 114(2/3):809-814.
[11]	梁俊丽, 孔维华, 费文华,等. 基于复杂地形的高斯烟羽模型改进[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016,10(6):3125-3129.
[12]	薛卫东, 朱正和, 邹乐西,等. 超临界CO₂热力学性质的理论计算[J]. 原子与分子物理学报, 2004, 21(2):295-300.
[13]	BROWN S, BECK J, MAHGEREFTEH H, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO₂ pipeline failure[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 115(8):43-54.
[14]	PENG D Y, ROBINSON D B. A new two-constant equation of state[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1976.
[15]	JOEL H F, MILOVAN P. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics[M]. Sprigner, 1999.
[16]	贺焕婷.定量风险分析(QRA)在天然气长输管道压气站区域及平面布置中的应用[J]. 管道保护,2020,1:36-41.
[17]	KIERSMA M E. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology 466[M]Third Edition. Academic Press:Oxford, 2014:454-455.