基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型的潘安湖湿地水环境健康评价

曹文平; 刘喜坤; 赵天晴; 田立; 刘勇

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032

基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型的潘安湖湿地水环境健康评价

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032

曹文平^1, ,,
刘喜坤²,
赵天晴³,
田立⁴,
刘勇⁵

1. 徐州工程学院环境工程学院, 江苏徐州 221111;
2. 江苏建筑职业技术学院, 江苏徐州 221116;
3. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程国家重点实验室, 南京 210098;
4. 江苏省水文水资源勘测局南通分局, 江苏南通 226000;
5. 中国矿业大学, 江苏徐州 221116

基金项目:

水利部科技推广计划项目（TG1517）；江苏省高等学校自然科学研究重大项目（20KJA610004）；徐州工程学院科研项目（XKY2019120）。

详细信息

作者简介:
曹文平(1979-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事水资源保护及水环境修复方面的研究工作。caowenping5000@163.com

通讯作者:
曹文平(1979-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事水资源保护及水环境修复方面的研究工作。caowenping5000@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 547
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-17

EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL

1. School of Environmental Engineering, Xuzhou Institute of Technology, Xuzhou 221111, China;
2. Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
3. Hohai University, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210098, China;
4. Nantong Branch of Jiangsu Province Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau, Nantong 226000, China;
5. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

摘要

摘要: 以PSR模型为框架，选取污水处理率、水质状况、生物多样性、环保投资指数等14个评价指标建立了潘安湖湿地水环境健康评价体系，采用层次分析法确定指标的权重，将湿地水环境健康状况由很健康到病态分成5个级别，利用模糊综合评价法对潘安湖湿地水环境健康状况进行评价。结果表明：潘安湖湿地水环境健康指数为2.8166，属于亚健康状态。其中压力指标得分1.7405，属于疾病状态；状态指标得分3.2563，属于亚健康状态；响应指标得分2.4483，处在亚健康状态与疾病状态之间。该结果可为类似地表水体环境健康评价提供参考。
- 潘安湖湿地 /
- 健康评价 /
- 压力-状态-响应模型 /
- 层次分析法 /
- 模糊综合评价
Abstract: Based on the PSR model, 14 evaluation indexes, including sewage treatment rate, water quality status, biodiversity and environmental investment index were selected to establish the water environment health evaluation system of Pan'an Lake wetland, and their weights of indexes were determined by analytic hierarchy process. The health status of wetland water environment was classified into 5 levels from very healthy to morbid, and then the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the health status of Pan'an Lake wetland water environment. The evaluation results showed that the water environmental health index of Pan'an Lake wetland was 2.8166, belonging to sub-health state. The stress index score was 1.7405, which was in disease status. The status index score was 3.2563, belonging to the sub-health state. The response index score was 2.4483, which was between sub-health state and disease state.
- Pan'an lake wetland /
- health assessment /
- pressure-state-response model /
- analytic hierarchy process /
- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	SPIEGEL J M, BONET M, YASSI A. Developing ecosystem health indicators in centro Habana:a community-based approach[J]. Ecosystem Health, 2001, 7(1):15-26.
[2]	武海涛, 吕宪国. 中国湿地评价研究进展与展望[J].世界林业研究, 2005, 18(4):49-53.
[3]	ROMBOUTS I, BEAUGRAND G, ARTIGAS L F, et al. Evaluating marine ecosystem health:case studies of indicators using direct observations and modelling methods[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 24(1):353-365.
[4]	SCHNEIDER B D. Monitoring for ecological integrity:the state of treat In Daninel. Ecological Indicators[M]. Barking:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd,1992:1403-1419.
[5]	蒋卫国. 基于RS和GIS的湿地生态系统健康评价——以辽河三角洲盘锦市为例[D]. 南京:南京师范大学, 2003.
[6]	刘明华, 董贵华. 城市生态系统健康评价指标体系的构建——以秦皇岛市生态系统为例[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2005, 14(3):161-164.
[7]	张有贤, 李二强, 罗东霞, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的兰州水环境安全模糊综合评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020,20(2):709-718.
[8]	陈凤, 苏少川, 陈妍, 等. 基于PSR模型的闽东滨海湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2020, 16(3):25-28.
[9]	张二丽, 王太行, 王玉龙, 等. 基于模糊综合评价模型的郑州市东风渠水环境质量评价研究[J]. 商丘职业技术学院学报, 2020,19(2):80-84.
[10]	王亚斌, 师宝忠, 管景峰. 白洋淀湿地生态环境监测体系的构建[J]. 环境工程, 2013,31(增刊1):625-628.
[11]	CHEN Y L, LI T C, HU H J, et al. Transport and fate of microplastics in constructed wetlands:a microcosm study[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021,415(8):125615-125627.
[12]	吕添贵, 孔安妮, 汪立. 基于PSR模型的生态文明示范区生态安全评价及其障碍诊断[J].水土保持研究. 2021,28(2):343-350.
[13]	王维晴, 周立志, 陈薇, 等. 长江下游升金湖湿地保护有效性评价(1989-2019年)[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(3):494-506.
[14]	李虹, 王丽婧, 刘永. 水库型流域水质安全评估与预警技术框架. 水生态学杂志, 2018, 39(6):1-7.
[15]	XIAO S. Risk Identification and evaluation of science and technology collaborative innovation in Jiangxi Province[J].Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 2021, 3(2):54003-55011.