OPTIMIZATION ON EXCESS SLUDGE DEWATERING OF RURAL DISPERSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
-
摘要: 对农村剩余污泥的脱水性能进行调查,并通过单因素和全面实验法分别对几种药剂的单一和复合调理进行优化。运用响应面法优化不同调理剂组合调理农村剩余污泥的搅拌参数。实验结果表明:不同农村污水处理设施剩余污泥的脱水性能存在较大差异。单一和复合药剂调理都可以明显降低污泥的脱水性能。优化搅拌速度和搅拌时间可以进一步降低污泥的毛细吸水时间(CST)。通过实验对比多种调理剂组合,发现最佳组合为聚合氯化铝(PAC)和聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)组合,搅拌参数为:一级搅拌速度为500 r/min,一级搅拌时间为0.5 min,二级搅拌速度为150 r/min,二级搅拌时间为10 min。该条件下,污泥的CST为10.1 s,调理总费用为10.69元/t污泥(98%含水率)。Abstract: The dewaterability of excess sludge from wastewater treatment facilities in rural areas was investigated, and single factor and comprehensive experimental methods were used to optimize the condition of the sludge with single and compound chemicals. Meanwhile, the stirring parameters were further optimized by applying response surface methods. The experimental results showed the variation dewaterability of the excess sludge between different rural wastewater treatment facilities was quite different. Both single and compound conditioners could significantly reduce the capillary suction time(CST) of sludge and improve the sludge dewatering. The optimization results showed that the suitable stirring speed and stirring time could further reduce the CST of sludge. The best combination was polyaluminium chloride(PAC) and polyacrylamide(PAM), when the first stirring speed and time were 500 r/min and 0.5 min, and the second stirring speed and time were 150 r/min and 10 min, sludge CST value reached 10.1. Additionally, the total cost of the conditioning was equal to RMB 10.69/ton wet sludge with moisture content of 98%.
-
Key words:
- rural excess sludge /
- sludge dewatering /
- conditioner /
- mixing parameters
-
[1] 吕卓,徐鑫亮,万祥荣.基于人口"乡-城"动态迁移视角的农村人口预测:以黑龙江省为例[J].大连大学学报,2019,40(6):87-95. [2] WARD B J,TRABER J,GUEYE A,et al.Evaluation of conceptual model and predictors of faecal sludge dewatering performance in Senegal and Tanzania[J].Water Research,2019,167:115101. [3] LINDA S,LARS S,FABIAN B,et al.Methods to reliably estimate faecal sludge quantities and qualities for the design of treatment technologies and management solutions[J].Journal of Environmental Mangement,2018,223:898-907. [4] ZHUO Q F,ZHENG W L,YI H,et al.Influences of different conditioners on dehydration ratio of activated sludge[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2017,94(1):28-30. [5] 洪晨,邢奕,王志强,等.无机调理剂与表面活性剂联合调理对污泥脱水性能的影响[J].化工学报,2014,65(3):1068-1075. [6] MORITZ G,HIDENORI H,JEAN-DAVID T,et al.Cross-country analysis of faecal sludge dewatering[J].Environmental Technology,2018,39(23):3077-3087. [7] 赵由才,王瑟澜,米琼,等.对干化污泥集装化运输技术的研究与分析[J].有色冶金设计与研究,2017,38(6):110-113. [8] 刘欢,杨家宽,时亚飞,等.不同调理方案下污泥脱水性能评价指标的相关性研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(11):3394-3399. [9] 李雪峰,赵佳,韩晓刚,等.聚合硫酸铁对污泥脱水性能的关键影响因素研究[J].环保科技,2016,22(5):1-7. [10] 李旺,李振亮,祖波.有机质与无机电解质对黏性泥沙絮凝影响研究综述[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2018,32(5):140-144,198. [11] TO V H P,NGUYEN T V,VIGNESWARAN S,et al.A review on sludge dewatering indices[J].Water Science Technology,2016,74(1):1-16. [12] 郭敏辉.化学调理改善活性污泥脱水性能的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014. [13] 洪晨,邢奕,王志强,等.无机调理剂与表面活性剂联合调理对污泥脱水性能的影响[J].化工学报,2014,65(3):1068-1075. [14] 许保玖.给水处理理论[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004:234-244. [15] 张立洲.铝、铁盐调理下搅拌对污泥絮体作用及其脱水特性研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 177
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0