美国污染场地修复技术对我国修复行业发展的启示

梁竞; 王世杰; 张文毓; 张丹; 张元; 邹惠

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

美国污染场地修复技术对我国修复行业发展的启示

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

梁竞^1,2,
王世杰^1,2,3, ,,
张文毓^1,3,
张丹^1,3,
张元¹,
邹惠¹

1. 北京市环境保护科学研究院, 北京 100037;
2. 国家城市环境污染控制工程技术研究中心, 北京 100037;
3. 污染场地风险模拟与修复北京市重点实验室, 北京 100037

基金项目:

北京市科技计划（Z181100005318002）

详细信息

作者简介:
梁竞(1985-),女,硕士,高工,主要研究方向为土壤修复治理技术研发。liangjing@cee.cn

通讯作者:
王世杰(1978-),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为污染场地土壤和地下水修复治理技术。wangshijie@cee.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 382
- HTML全文浏览量: 62
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-06-04
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-18

REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA

LIANG Jing^1,2,
WANG Shi-jie^{1,2,3
, ,},
ZHANG Wen-yu^1,3,
ZHANG Dan^1,3,
ZHANG Yuan¹,
ZOU Hui¹

1. Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Urban Environmental Pollution Control, Beijing 100037, China;
3. Beijing Key Laboratory for Risk Modeling and Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Beijing 100037, China

摘要

摘要: 随着我国工业化进程的发展，暴露出来的土壤污染问题越来越严重。对我国2005—2019年以来455个污染场地修复项目进行了统计分析，发现我国污染场地修复项目数量逐年递增，修复方式以异位修复为主，占比为63%，修复技术以阻隔/填埋（29%）、固化/稳定化（18%）为主。相比之下，2005—2014年，美国污染场地修复方式实现了从异位修复到原位修复的转换，原位修复技术占比达到54%，其中土壤气相抽提技术、物理分离、固化/稳定化技术、化学修复和生物修复技术应用居多，地下水抽提-处理技术的应用逐年下降。基于美国修复技术发展趋势，我国未来修复技术路线应以原位修复为主。
- 土壤 /
- 地下水 /
- 污染场地 /
- 修复技术 /
- 发展趋势
Abstract: Soil pollution becomes more and more serious in China, and this paper conducted a statistical analysis of 455 soil remediation projects since 2005-2019, and preliminarily expounded some characteristics, that is, the number of soil remediation projects is increasing and the main remediation methods are off-site method, accounting for 63% of the total projects. The mainstream remediation technologies are barrier/landfill(29%) and solidification/stabilization(18%). In contrast, in-situ remediation technology(54%) was the mainstream technology for site remediation technologies in the United States from 2005 to 2014, and most of them were soil vapor extraction, physical separation, solidification/stabilization, chemical remediation and bioremediation, among which the application of groundwater extraction treatment technology decreased year by year. Based on the developing tread in the USA, the remediation technologies in China was predicted to be mainly in-situ remediation.
- soil /
- groundwater /
- contaminated sites /
- remediation technology /
- trend

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	骆永明.中国污染场地修复的研究进展、问题与展望[J].环境监测管理与技术,2011,23(3):1-6.
[2]	刘阳生,李书鹏,邢轶兰,等.2019年土壤修复行业发展评述及展望[J].中国环保产业,2020(3):26-30.
[3]	串丽敏,郑怀国,赵同科,等.基于Web of Science数据库的土壤污染修复领域发展态势分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(1):12-20.
[4]	陈卫平,谢天,李笑诺,等.中国土壤污染防治技术体系建设思考[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):557-568.
[5]	郭媛媛,江河,沈鹏.在我国土壤污染治理中推行"场地修复+"模式的思考与建议[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(4):126-129.
[6]	王泓泉.污染场地土壤修复技术对比分析[J].资源节约与环保,2019,8:32-33.
[7]	国家统计局,环境保护部.中国环境年鉴(1996-2010)[M].北京:中国统计出版社.
[8]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.中国城市建设统计年鉴(2007-2016)[M].北京:中国统计出版社.
[9]	环境保护部,国土资源部.全国土壤污染状况调查公报[EB/OL].http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm.2014-04-17.
[10]	许春娅.工业污染场地土壤修复技术研究[J].资源节约与环保,2019(3):99.
[11]	MAO G Z,SHI T T,ZHANG S,et al.Bibliometric analysis of insights into soil remediation[J].Journal of Soil & Sediments,2018,18(7):2520-2534.
[12]	王艳伟,李书鹏,康绍果,等.中国工业污染场地修复发展状况分析[J].环境工程,2017,35(10):175-178.
[13]	US EPA.Superfund Remedy Report Fifth Edition[M].Washington DC:Office of Land and Emergency Management,2017.
[14]	刘士文,刘阳.污染场地的土壤修复与治理[J].区域治理,2020(1):148-150.
[15]	TENG Y,CHEN W.Soil microbiomes-a promising strategy for contaminated soil remediation:a review[J].Pedosphere,2019,29(3):283-297.
[16]	SHI Z M,LIU J H,TANG Z W,et al.Vermiremediation of organically contaminated soils:concepts,current status,and future perspectives[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,147:103377.
[17]	CAROLINE V,ADAN W D S T,ADELI B B,et al.Application of life cycle assessment as a tool for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated sites remediation:a systematic and bibliographic analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,672:893-905.
[18]	ANDERSON R,NORRMAN J,BACK P E,et al.What's the point?The contribution of a sustainability view in contaminated site remediation[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,630:103-116.
[19]	ADELI B B,ADAN W D S T,CAROLINE V,et al.Relevance of sustainable remediation to contaminated sites manage in developed and developing countries:case of Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2020,94:104533.
[20]	MA Y,DONG B B,BAI Y Y,et al.Remediation status and practices for contaminated sites in China:survey-based analysis[J].Environmental Science & Pollution Research,2018,25(33):33216-33224.
[21]	KUPPUSAMY S,THAVAMANI P,VENKATESWARLU K,et al.Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils:technological constraints,emerging trends and future directions[J].Chemosphere,2017,168:944-968.
[22]	陈卫平,谢天,李笑诺,等.欧美发达国家场地土壤污染防治技术体系概述[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):527-542.
[23]	US EPA.Superfund Remedy Report Fourth Edition[M].Wangshington DC:Office of Land and Emergency Management,2014.