典型海水淡化系统的水足迹评价

邢丁予; 陶思怡; 张小磊; 潘献辉; 董文艺; 尤菁; 孙飞云

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202107010

典型海水淡化系统的水足迹评价

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107010

1. 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) 土木与环境学院, 广东深圳 518055;
2. 自然资源部天津海水淡化与综合利用研究所, 天津 300192

基金项目:

国家“十三五”重点研发计划课题（2018YFF0215705）

详细信息

作者简介:
邢丁予(1986-),女,助理教授,主要研究方向为膜技术在水处理中的应用。xingdingyu@hit.edu.cn

通讯作者:
董文艺(1967-),男,教授,主要研究方向为城市水资源开发利用和水污染控制。dwy1967@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 266
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-21
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-18

WATER FOOTPRINT EVALUATION OF TYPICAL SEAWATER DESALINATION SYSTEMS

1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology(Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China;
2. The Institute of Seawater Desalination and Multipurpose Utilization, MNR(Tianjin), Tianjin 300192, China

摘要

摘要: 海水淡化是缓解我国水资源匮乏的有效方式之一。目前国内外主要关注海水淡化技术的成本和水质，缺乏对海水淡化水资源效益的量化评价。根据ISO水足迹理论，划定海水淡化量化边界，进行典型海水淡化工艺生产阶段清单分析，建立了海水淡化水足迹量化及评价方法。结果表明：低温多效蒸馏水稀缺足迹比反渗透水稀缺足迹高出3~4倍，2种工艺的海水淡化水稀缺足迹的关键影响因素均为电耗；反渗透工艺的水劣化足迹均低于低温多效蒸馏工艺海水淡化。因此，在样本范围内，反渗透工艺的水资源效益整体优于低温多效蒸馏工艺。水足迹评价研究结果揭示，海水淡化生产阶段的水资源消耗和水质影响，有助于引导海水淡化技术向提高水资源效益和降低能耗、消除水污染的方向发展，以期为海水资源科学开发利用提供技术支撑。
- 水足迹 /
- 海水淡化 /
- 反渗透 /
- 低温多效蒸馏 /
- 水资源效益
Abstract: Seawater desalination, in rapid development, is an effective measure to alleviate the freshwater scarcity crisis in China. However, there is a significant concern about the water quality and cost of the desalination systems, but little attention has been paid to the quantitative evaluation of water resource efficiency. Based on the ISO water footprint principle, this work delineated the system boundary of sea water desalination, performed the inventory analysis of the production phase of seawater desalination systems, and proposed a method for water footprint quantification and evaluation of typical seawater desalination systems. Evaluation results revealed that the scarcity footprint of the multi-effect distillation(MED) technology was 3~4 times higher than that of the reverse osmosis(RO) technology, and the power consumption was the determining factor for the water footprint of all the technologies. The degradation water footprint of RO technology was much lower than that of MED. Overall, the RO technology showed more excellent water resource efficiency than the MED among the studied cases. This work revealed the consumption and pollution of water resources in seawater desalination production via the water footprint analysis. It may help develop the sea water desalination improve water resource efficiency, reduce energy consumption and eliminate water pollution, and provide support for scientific development and utilization of seawater.
- water footprint /
- sea water desalination /
- reverse osmosis /
- multi-effect distillation /
- water resource efficiency

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	CAO T,WANG S G,CHEN B.Water shortage risk transferred through interprovincial trade in Northeast China[J].Energy Procedia,2019,158:3865-3871.
[2]	石为民.我国海水淡化行业发展现状及前景[J].通用机械,2020(6):19-22.
[3]	KIM J,PARK K,YANG D R,et al.A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants[J].Applied Energy,2019,254:113652.
[4]	杜攀.影响海水淡化产业发展的两个重要因素[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2013.
[5]	ELSAID K,KAMIL M,SAYED E T,et al.Environmental impact of desalination technologies:a review[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,748:141528.
[6]	赵艳超.沧东电厂海水淡化项目综合效益评价[D].北京:华北电力大学,2013.
[7]	张鹏.国华沧电日产20万吨海水淡化项目后评价研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2013.
[8]	IBRAHIM Y,ARAFAT H A,MEZHER T,et al.An integrated framework for sustainability assessment of seawater desalination[J].Desalination,2018,447:1-17.
[9]	张杉雪,张文龙,熊维,等.典型海水淡化工艺的生命周期评价[J].环境工程,2019,37(3):168-173.
[10]	HOEKSTRA A Y,HUNG P Q.Globalisation of water resources:international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade[J].Global Environmental Change,2005,15(1):45-56.
[11]	HOGEBOOM R J.The water footprint concept and water's grand environmental challenges[J].One Earth,2020,2(3):218-222.
[12]	MURATOGLU A.Grey water footprint of agricultural production:an assessment based on nitrogen surplus and high-resolution leaching runoff fractions in Turkey[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,742:140553.
[13]	YANG Y D,HE W W,CHEN F L,et al.Water footprint assessment of silk apparel in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,260:121050.
[14]	IBIDHI R,BEN S H.Water footprint and economic water productivity of sheep meat at farm scale in humid and semi-arid agro-ecological zones[J].Small Ruminant Research,2018,166:101-108.
[15]	YUAN Q,SONG G B,FULLANA-I-PALMER P,et al.Water footprint of feed required by farmed fish in China based on a Monte Carlo-supported von Bertalanffy growth model:a policy implication[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,153:41-50.
[16]	GERBENS-LEENNES P W,HOEKSTRA A Y,BOSMAN R.The blue and grey water footprint of construction materials:steel,cement and glass[J].Water Resources and Industry,2018,19:1-12.
[17]	董泽亮,潘献辉,尤菁,等.水足迹评价研究进展[J].水资源研究,2019,8(3):234-241.
[18]	HOEKSTRA A Y,胡克斯特拉,CHAPAGAIN,等.水足迹评价手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[19]	白雪,胡梦婷,朱春雁.ISO14046:2014《环境管理水足迹原则、要求与指南》国际标准解读[J].标准科学,2015(9):56-60.