过滤养猪废水厌氧发酵微生物菌群结构及动态变化

章恬恬; 关正军; 张洋洋; 尹恒

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202108007

过滤养猪废水厌氧发酵微生物菌群结构及动态变化

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108007

西南大学工程技术学院, 重庆 400715

基金项目:

水禽养殖污水资源化利用关键技术研究与应用示范（cstc2019ngzx0017）。

详细信息

作者简介:
章恬恬(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农业废弃物资源化利用。cqzhangtiantian@163.com

通讯作者:
关正军(1970-),男,教授,主要研究方向为农业废弃物资源化利用。zhjguan@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 236
- HTML全文浏览量: 28
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-17
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-18

MICROBIAL FLORA STRUCTURE AND ITS DYNAMIC CHANGES DURING ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF FILTERED SWINE WASTEWATER

College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

摘要

摘要: 传统厌氧发酵处理养猪废水存在效率低、周期长以及环境要求严苛等局限，无法实现高效运行。基于自主设计的种养废弃物综合资源化利用技术，利用玉米秸秆过滤养猪废水中的悬浮性固体，对比研究废水过滤前后性质，并采用高通量测序技术分析厌氧发酵过程中过滤养猪废水的细菌与古菌群落组成和变化特征。结果表明：厌氧发酵过程由多种微生物菌群协同作用，不同水力停留时间下，过滤养猪废水中的主要细菌类群是厚壁菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门，除接种物外，其他3个样本中均检测到螺旋菌门的存在。此外，废水中主要古菌类群为广古菌门，主要作用菌为产甲烷菌。水力停留时间变化对古菌群落变化具有显著影响，导致产甲烷的差异性。微生物群落和废水指标变化表明种养废弃物综合资源化利用技术降低了处理成本，对促进养猪废水资源循环利用具有参考意义。
- 厌氧发酵 /
- 养猪废水 /
- 过滤 /
- 高通量测序 /
- 微生物菌群
Abstract: The treatment of pig raising wastewater by traditional anaerobic fermentation methods has some limitations for application such as low efficiency, long cycle length, and strict environmental requirements, which cannot treat pig raising wastewater with high efficiency. In this paper, we filtered the suspended solids from pig rearing wastewater by using corn straw, based on an autonomous designed integrated resource-based utilization technology, comparatively studied the properties before and after wastewater filtration, and analyzed the bacterial and archaeal community composition and change characteristics of filtered pig rearing wastewater during anaerobic fermentation by using high-throughput sequencing. The results of this study showed that anaerobic fermentation process was condutcted by multiple microbial flora, and that the predominant bacterial taxa in filtered pig wastewater at different hydraulic residence times were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and the presence of spirochaetes was detected in all three samples except inoculum. In addition, the main archaeal group in wastewater was the phylum Guanggu, and the main acting bacteria were methanogens. Hydraulic retention time variation had a significant impact on archaeal community change, resulting in differential methanogenesis. The changes in microbial communities and wastewater indicators indicated that the comprehensive and resource-based technology of breeding waste reduced the treatment cost, and had reference significance for recycling wastewater resources from pig cultivation.
- anaerobic fermentation /
- piggery wastewater /
- filter /
- high throughput sequencing /
- microbial flora

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

[1]	李耀宇.猪场粪污厌氧发酵过程解析及沼液处理工艺研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2019.
[2]	CYDZIKKWIATKOWSKA A,ZIELINSKA M.Bacterial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment systems[J].World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology,2016,32(4):66.
[3]	曲壮壮.猪粪厌氧发酵重金属镉/铬的形态转化及产气特性研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2020.
[4]	黄薇,刘兰英,吴妙鸿,等.养殖废水处理系统中微生物菌群结构及动态变化[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(2):839-848.
[5]	李黔花,李志华,岳秀,等.好氧颗粒污泥处理印染废水的效能及其微生物特征[J].工业水处理,2020,40(3):43-48.
[6]	翟一帆,袁青彬,胡南.养猪废水处理系统微生物群落结构变化及影响因素研究[J].水资源保护,2018,34(1):88-94.
[7]	张洋洋,关正军,章恬恬,等.过滤后养猪废水厌氧发酵与固氮技术研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2020,51(1):90-96.
[8]	韩文忠.储藏稻谷中真菌的变性梯度凝胶电泳图像处理软件及菌群演变数据管理系统开发[D].南京:南京农业大学,2016.
[9]	ZHUO X,SUN H,HUANG B,et al.Evaluation of potential anti-toxoplasmosis efficiency of combined traditional herbs in a mouse model[J].Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B,2017,18(6):453-461.
[10]	DUAN M L,XIAO X Y,HUANG Y M,et al.Immuno-HCR based on contact quenching and fluorescence resonance energy transfer for sensitive and low background detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7[J].Food Chemistry,2020,334:127568.
[11]	武亚婷,杜木英,何欢欢,等.基于高通量测序技术分析新疆不同地区自然发酵辣椒酱微生物群落多样性[J].食品与发酵工业,2019,45(21):221-228.
[12]	ILARIA C,CASTRO N,GIOVANNI B,et al.Shift in the cow milk microbiota during alpine pasture as analyzed by culture dependent and high-throughput sequencing techniques[J].Food Microbiology,2020,91:103504.
[13]	赵佩文.不同氮污染水体中微生物对环境的生态响应[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2016.
[14]	FONTANA V,GUARIENTO E,HILPOLD A,et al.Species richness and beta diversity patterns of multiple taxa along an elevational gradient in pastured grasslands in the European Alps[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):12516.
[15]	YU C,YIN J,WANG X,et al.Association between SNAP25 and human glioblastoma multiform:a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis[J].Bioscience Reports,2020,40(6):BSR20200516.
[16]	冼超彦.ABR作为产甲烷反应器的两相厌氧工艺处理有机废水的试验研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2010.
[17]	ZHANG K Y,GU J,WANG X J,et al.Variations in the denitrifying microbial community and functional genes during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,634:501-508.
[18]	卢瑶.IC厌氧反应器运行过程微生物群落演替及功能的研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2018.
[19]	GERRITY D,ARNOLD M,DICKENSON E,et al.Microbial community characterization of ozone-biofiltration systems in drinking water and potable reuse applications[J].Water Research,2018,135:207-219.
[20]	段昌海,张翠景,孙艺华,等.新型产甲烷古菌研究进展[J].微生物学报,2019,59(6):981-995.
[21]	余知,霍乃蕊.微生物生物学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2018.
[22]	BLOHS M,MOISSL-EICHINGER C,MAHNERT A,et al.Archaea-An Introduction[M].Schmidt T M.Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Fourth Edition).Oxford:Academic Press,2019:243-252.
[23]	HAO L,BIZE A,CONTEAU D,et al.New insights into the key microbial phylotypes of anaerobic sludge digesters under different operational conditions[J].Water Research,2016,102:158-169.
[24]	邓娇娇.辽东山区不同森林恢复类型土壤有机碳固存的微生物学机理[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2020.