基于生命周期思想的透水铺装资源环境影响评价述评

解超; 吕彬; 王思思; 王培军

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202108027

基于生命周期思想的透水铺装资源环境影响评价述评

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108027

解超^1,2,
吕彬³,
王思思^1,2,4, ,,
王培军⁵

1. 北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境教育部重点实验室, 北京 100044;
2. 北京建筑大学环境与能源工程学院, 北京 100044;
3. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;
4. 北京建工建筑设计研究院, 北京 100044;
5. 青岛华新园置业有限公司, 山东青岛 266024

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目"建筑与小区绿地的径流削减效果影响因子及径流系数研究"（31870704）；国家自然科学基金重点项目"城市生态资产的评估方法与管理机制研究"（71734006）。

详细信息

作者简介:
解超(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市水环境科学与系统工程。598320896@qq.com

通讯作者:
王思思(1983-),女,副教授,主要研究方向为城市雨水控制利用。wangsisi@bucea.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 139
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-16
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-18

REVIEW ON RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BASED ON LIFE CYCLE THINKING

XIE Chao^1,2,
LV Bin³,
WANG Si-si^{1,2,4
, ,},
WANG Pei-jun⁵

1. Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
2. School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
3. State Key Lab of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
4. Beijing Construction Engineering Architectural Design Institute, Beijing 100044, China;
5. Qingdao Huaxinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd, Qingdao 266024, China

摘要

摘要: 透水铺装作为典型的海绵城市设施，具有城市雨水径流减排、水质净化等多种环境效益，但在材料制备、施工、维护管理过程中相对于传统铺装资源能源消耗有所增加，亟须应用生命周期评价这一系统分析方法，开展透水铺装的资源环境效益的综合评估。通过文献述评，总结了生命周期评价方法应用于透水铺装评估的现状与面临的挑战，并提出了相应对策：将运行维护阶段纳入评价系统边界，有助于提升透水铺装资源环境评价的全面性；针对生命周期评价结果难以指导工程设计的问题，建议将生命周期评价与建筑信息模型相结合，优化透水铺装的绿色设计；针对透水效应动态变化等生命周期环境影响评价方法问题，建议将水文模型引入整体评估方法。通过上述角度的提升，生命周期评价方法有望为透水铺装的政策制定、规划设计、施工养护等全过程提供参考数据与优化方案，助力海绵城市建设乃至城市生态系统的良性发展。
- 海绵城市 /
- 透水铺装 /
- 生命周期评价 /
- 资源环境效益
Abstract: As a typical sponge city infrastructure, permeable pavement has produced various environmental benefits such as urban rainwater reduction and water quality purification. However, in the process of material preparation, construction, maintenance and management, permeable pavement increased resource and energy consumption compared with the traditional pavement. It is urgent to apply the systematic analysis method of life cycle to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the resource and environmental benefits of permeable pavement. Through literature review, this study summarized the status and challenges of LCA application to permeable pavement assessment, and proposed corresponding countermeasures: incorporating the operation and maintenance stage into the boundary of the assessment system will help improve the comprehensiveness of the resource and environmental evaluation of permeable pavement; in view of the fact that the results of LCA are difficult to guide the engineering design, it was suggested to combine LCA with building information model to optimize the green design of permeable pavement; in view of the problems of life cycle environmental impact assessment methods such as the dynamic changes of permeation effect, it was recommended to introduce hydrological models into the overall assessment method. Through the improvement of the above perspective, the LCA method was expected to provide reference and optimization scheme for the whole process of policy-making, planning and design, construction and maintenance of permeable pavement, and help the construction of sponge city and the healthy development of urban ecosystem.
- sponge city /
- permeable pavement /
- life cycle assessment /
- resource and environmental benefits

HTML全文

参考文献(53)

[1]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.海绵城市建设技术指南——低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[2]	韩煦,赵亚乾.海绵城市建设中"海绵体"的开发[J].地球科学与环境学报,2016,38(5):708-714.
[3]	薛小杰,贾果.海绵城市建设中透水铺装技术的发展应用[J].智能建筑与智慧城市,2018(7):107-108.
[4]	WANG Y,LI H,GHADIMI,et al.Initial evaluation methodology and case studies for life cycle impact of permeability of permeable pavements[J].International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology,2018,7(3):169-178.
[5]	朱金春.再生骨料透水性混凝土的研究与制备[D].扬州:扬州大学,2016.
[6]	张彬鸿,李家科,李亚娇.低影响开发(LID)透水铺装技术研究进展[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(4):137-144.
[7]	应君,张青萍.海绵城市理念下城市透水性铺装的应用研究[J].现代城市研究,2016(7):41-46.
[8]	石雷,赵翎亦,于路港.基于SWMM模型的透水路面径流削减效果评估[J].净水技术,2019,38(10):51-55.
[9]	李美玉,张守红,王玉杰,等.透水铺装径流调控效益研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2018,41(12):105-112 ,130.
[10]	王俊岭,徐怡,魏胜,等.透水混凝土铺装各层对径流污染物的削减试验研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(10):39-43.
[11]	刘亚楠.海绵城市中透水铺装的应用推广研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2017.
[12]	王德蜜,姜迪,狄升贯.透水路面设计与材料应用综述[J].城市道桥与防洪,2013(9):35-38,8.
[13]	李俊奇,张哲,王耀堂,等.透水铺装设计与维护管理的关键问题分析[J].给水排水,2019,55(6):26-31.
[14]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.透水水泥混凝土路面技术规程:CJJ/T 135-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009:16.
[15]	WINSTON R J,AL-RUBAEI A M,BLECKEN G T,et al.Maintenance measures for preservation and recovery of permeable pavement surface infiltration rate:the effects of street sweeping,vacuum cleaning,high pressure washing,and milling[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,169:132-144.
[16]	陈东平,余恒鹏,金洁,等.低影响开发(LID)透水砖铺装系统的研究进展[J].材料导报,2017,31(增刊2):423-427.
[17]	王兴桦,侯精明,李丙尧,等.多孔透水砖下渗衰减规律试验研究[J].给水排水,2019,55(增刊1):68-71.
[18]	LIN W G,PARK D G,RYU S W,et al.Development of permeability test method for porous concrete block pavement materials considering clogging[J].Construction and Building Materials,2016,118:20-26.
[19]	谢西,姜成,林晨彤,等.透水混凝土路面堵塞及其恢复效果研究[J].中外公路,2019,39(1):46-49.
[20]	KUMAR K,KOZAK J,HUNDAL L,et al.In-situ infiltration performance of different permeable pavements in a employee used parking lot:a four-year study[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,167:8-14.
[21]	姜雪,李小平,董珑丽,等.LCA在产品生命周期环境影响评价中的应用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(增刊2):188-191.
[22]	郑晓云,徐金秀.基于LCA的装配式建筑全生命周期碳排放研究:以重庆市某轻钢装配式集成别墅为例[J].建筑经济,2019,40(1):107-111.
[23]	王玉涛,王丰川,洪静兰,等.中国生命周期评价理论与实践研究进展及对策分析[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7179-7184.
[24]	王玉合,张仕廉,樊文俊.基于CMLCA的高速公路沥青路面环境影响评价[J].公路,2017,62(5):161-168.
[25]	马峰,秦钜泽,傅珍,等.生命周期评价(LCA)在美国公路工程中的应用[J].中外公路,2014,34(5):332-337.
[26]	王海燕,刘华章.混凝土透水砖的配合比设计、生产与施工[J].新型建筑材料,2007(7):27-29.
[27]	YUAN X L,TANG Y Z,LI Y,et al.Environmental and economic impacts assessment of concrete pavement brick and permeable brick production process:a case study in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,171:198-208.
[28]	REHAN T Y.Analysis of life-cycle cost,properties,and field performance of parking lot pavements[D].Southern Illinois:Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville,2016.
[29]	刘洪涛,李艳芳,石时.透水性路面与普通路面的生命周期评价[J].城市问题,2017(5):52-57.
[30]	LIU J W,LI H,WANG Y,et al.Integrated life cycle assessment of permeable pavement:model development and case study[J].Transportation Research Part D,2020,85:102381.
[31]	VAZ I C M,GHISI E,THIVES L P.Life cycle energy assessment and economic feasibility of stormwater harvested from pervious pavements[J].Water Research,2020,170:115322.
[32]	芦琳,陈韬,付婉霞,等.LID措施生命周期评价方法探析:以雨水花园与渗透铺装+渗透管/井系统为例[J].绿色科技,2013(5):287-291.
[33]	BHATT A,BRADFORD A,ABBASSI B E.Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of low-impact-development (LID) technologies in southern Ontario[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2019,231:98-109.
[34]	罗晓,叶文明.基于LCC理论的既有建筑成本管理研究[J].建筑经济,2014,35(6):118-120.
[35]	任国强,莫秀良.生命周期成本分析在城市水利系统中的应用[J].水利水电技术,2003(5):20-22.
[36]	MEI C,LIU J H,WANG H,et al.Integrated assessments of green infrastructure for flood mitigation to support robust decision-making for sponge city construction in an urbanized watershed[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,639:1394-1407.
[37]	XU C Q,TANG T,JIA H F,et al.Benefits of coupled green and grey infrastructure systems:evidence based on analytic hierarchy process and life cycle costing[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2019,151:104478.
[38]	WANG Z L,ZHOU S Q,WANG M,et al.Cost-benefit analysis of low-impact development at hectare scale for urban stormwater source control in response to anticipated climatic change[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,264:110483.
[39]	THUY N T,HAO N H,WENSHAN G,et al.A new model framework for sponge city implementation:emerging challenges and future developments[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,253:109689.
[40]	郑玲,张琪,杨密圆.生命周期成本与生命周期评价:集成模型与协同路径[J].会计之友,2020(9):47-50.
[41]	RISTIMÄKI M,SÄYNÄJOKI A,HEINONEN J,et al.Combining life cycle costing and life cycle assessment for an analysis of a new residential district energy system design[J].Energy,2013,63:168-179.
[42]	RÖCK M,HOLLBERG A,HABERT G,et al.LCA and BIM:visualization of environmental potentials in building construction at early design stages[J].Building and Environment,2018,140:153-161.
[43]	BUENO C,FABRICIO M M.Comparative analysis between a complete LCA study and results from a BIM-LCA plug-in[J].Automation in Construction,2018,90:188-200.
[44]	HOLLBERG A,GENOVA G,HABERT G.Evaluation of BIM-based LCA results for building design[J].Automation in Construction,2020,109:102972.
[45]	高学珑,陈奕,许乃星,等.基于BIM的海绵城市规划建设运维管控关键技术研究[J].给水排水,2019,55(10):51-56.
[46]	SANTOS R,COSTA A A,SILVESTRE J D,et al.Informetric analysis and review of literature on the role of BIM in sustainable construction[J].Automation in Construction,2019,103:221-234.
[47]	李奇芫,杨向群,杨崴.基于BIM的小型节能建筑生命周期环境影响和成本分析[J].南方建筑,2017(2):45-50.
[48]	陈楠,徐照,李启明.结合BIM的工程项目全生命周期环境影响评价与决策分析方法研究[J].工程管理学报,2016,30(2):97-102.
[49]	刘秋虹.三种初雨污染控制排水系统的生命周期环境影响评价研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2018.
[50]	梅超,刘家宏,王浩,等.SWMM原理解析与应用展望[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(5):33-42.
[51]	李朋,贺佳,吴朱昊,等.SWMM模型在海绵城市建设径流控制模拟中的应用[J].城市道桥与防洪,2019(11):69-72,80.
[52]	康得军,孙健,匡帅,等.暴雨洪水管理模型(SWMM)研究应用及发展趋势[J].净水技术,2019,38(3):45-50.
[53]	KOURTIS I M,TSIHRINTZIS V A,BALTAS E.A robust approach for comparing conventional and sustainable flood mitigation measures in urban basins[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,269:110822.