中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
环境科学领域高质量科技期刊分级目录T2级期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国化学文摘社（CAS）数据库 收录期刊
日本JST China 收录期刊
世界期刊影响力指数（WJCI）报告 收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

好氧颗粒污泥MBR工艺处理变电站生活污水性能分析

刘克成,  范辉,  高燕宁

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 环境工程  > 2021 >  39(9): 31-36
旦增, 周鹏, 汪晶, 穷达卓玛, 周文武, 李扬, 陈冠益. 拉萨市生活垃圾卫生填埋场土壤重金属调查和分析评价[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(11): 194-199. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201911032
引用本文: 刘克成, 范辉, 高燕宁. 好氧颗粒污泥MBR工艺处理变电站生活污水性能分析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(9): 31-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005
shu
LIU Ke-cheng, FAN Hui, GAO Yan-ning. PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE MBR PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUBSTATION SEWAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 31-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005
Citation: LIU Ke-cheng, FAN Hui, GAO Yan-ning. PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE MBR PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUBSTATION SEWAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 31-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005
shu

好氧颗粒污泥MBR工艺处理变电站生活污水性能分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005

  • 1. 国网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院, 石家庄 050021;

  • 2. 国网河北省电力有限公司, 石家庄 050000

基金项目: 

国家电网有限公司科技项目"电站生产污水、雨水与生活污水交叉利用资源化技术研究及应用"（kj2020-066）。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘克成(1972-),男,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为水资源管理及废水处理技术。hbdyylkc@163.com

    通讯作者:

    高燕宁(1981-),男,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为水资源管理及废水处理技术。hbdyygyn@163.com

PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE MBR PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUBSTATION SEWAGE

  • 1. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China;

  • 2. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 实验对比研究了好氧颗粒污泥膜生物反应器（AGMBR）和传统絮状污泥膜生物反应器（MBR）处理变电站生活污水过程中的膜污染行为及净水性能。以变电站生活污水作为进水，经60 d可以成功培养出好氧颗粒污泥。与传统絮状污泥相比，好氧颗粒污泥能够有效减缓膜污染，尤其是不可逆膜污染。AGMBR水力反洗频率仅为传统MBR的33.3%，30 d连续运行的膜孔阻力仅为传统MBR的69.3%。进一步分析发现，AGMBR反应器中EPS含量显著低于传统MBR，而且EPS中多糖组分含量也远低于传统MBR（仅为MBR的46%）。净水性能对比结果表明，AGMBR对TN和TP有着优异的去除性能，30 d运行平均去除率比传统MBR分别高出37.8%和40.5%。
    Abstract: This study compared the membrane fouling behavior and water purification performance of aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) and traditional flocculent sludge membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of substation sewage. Using substation domestic sewage as the feed water, aerobic granular sludge could be successfully cultivated after 60 days. Compared with traditional flocculent sludge, aerobic granular sludge could effectively slow down membrane fouling, especially irreversible membrane fouling. In AGMBR, the hydraulic backwash frequency was only 33.3% of that in traditional MBR, and the resistance from pore blocking in 30-day continuous operation was only 69.3% of traditional MBR. Further analysis suggested that EPS content in AGMBR reactor was significantly lower than that of traditional MBR, and the content of polysaccharide in EPS was only 46% of the traditional MBR. The comparison result in water purification performance showed that AGMBR had an excellent removal performance for TN and TP, and the average removal rate of 30-day running was 37.8% and 40.5% higher than that of the traditional MBR, respectively.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(20)
  • [1] NINOMIYA Y,KIMURA K,SATO T,et al.High-flux operation of MBRs with ceramic flat-sheet membranes made possible by intensive membrane cleaning:tests with real domestic wastewater under low-temperature conditions[J].Water Research,2020,181:115881-115889.
    [2] 李键,郭烨烨,王霞,等.活性炭提高膜生物反应器运行性能的研究进展[J].水处理技术,2021,47(1):7-11.
    [3] OU D,LI W,LI H,et al.Enhancement of the removal and settling performance for aerobic granular sludge under hypersaline stress[J].Chemosphere,2018,212:400-407.
    [4] CORSINO S F,CAMPO R,DI BELLA G,et al.Study of aerobic granular sludge stability in a continuous-flow membrane bioreactor[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,200:1055-1059.
    [5] EDWARD J H D,PRONK M,MARK C M van L.A settling model for full-scale aerobic granular sludge[J].Water Research,2020,186:116135-116144.
    [6] SGUANCI S,LUBELLO C,CAFFAZ S,et al.Long-term stability of aerobic granular sludge for the treatment of very low-strength real domestic wastewater[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,222:882-890.
    [7] LONG B,XUAN X P,YANG C Z,et al.Stability of aerobic granular sludge in a pilot scale sequencing batch reactor enhanced by granular particle size control[J].Chemosphere,2019,225:460-469.
    [8] CAI W,HUANG W L,LEI Z F,et al.Granulation of activated sludge using butyrate and valerate as additional carbon source and granular phosphorus removal capacity during wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2019,282:269-274.
    [9] CHEN C,GUO W S,NGO H H,et al.Effects of C/N ratio on the performance of a hybrid sponge-assisted aerobic moving bed-anaerobic granular membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2018,247:340-346.
    [10] IORHEMEN O T,HAMZA R A,ZAGHLOUL M S,et al.Simultaneous organics and nutrients removal in side-stream aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR)[J].Journal of Water Process Engineering,2018,21:127-132.
    [11] WANG X C,SHEN J M,CHEN Z L,et al.Removal of pharmaceuticals from synthetic wastewater in an aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor and determination of the bioreactor microbial diversity[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2016,100(18):8213-8223.
    [12] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [13] XU J,SHENG G P.Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) acted as a potential reservoir in responding to high concentrations of sulfonamides shocks during biological wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2020,313:123654-123657.
    [14] DI BELLA G,TORREGROSSA M,VIVIANI G.The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming:analysis of a submerged pilot plant[J].Bioresource Technology,2011,102(2):1628-1635.
    [15] 张淼,於蒙,潘婷,等.三级串联式BCO反应器比耗氧速率及菌群结构分析[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(6):1350-1358.
    [16] 卜凡.混凝、吸附与氧化预处理对超滤工艺水处理效能和膜污染的影响[D].济南:山东大学,2019.
    [17] CAMPO R,CAPODICI M,DI BELLA G,et al.The role of EPS in the foaming and fouling for a MBR operated in intermittent aeration conditions[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal,2017,118:41-52.
    [18] TAY J H,LIU Q S,LIU Y.The effects of shear force on the formation,structure and metabolism of aerobic granules[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2001,57(1/2):227-233.
    [19] LIU Y,TAY J H.The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granule sludge[J].Water Research,2002,36(7):1653-1665.
    [20] KIMURA K,HANE Y,WATANABE Y,et al.Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water[J].Water Research,2004,38(14/15):3431-3441.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献

  • 期刊类型引用(11)

    1. 李源，肖致美，毕晓辉，蔡子颖，徐虹，高璟赟，郑乃源，杨宁. 天津市“十三五”期间O_3污染特征和驱动因子. 环境科学. 2023(08): 4241-4249 . 百度学术
    2. 李源，白宇，郭瑞，刘彬，孔君，李丹. 天津市北辰区PM_(2.5)污染特征及来源分析. 环境影响评价. 2023(06): 63-69 . 百度学术
    3. Yunyan LI，Jian DAI. Construction and Implementation Approaches of Ecological Compensation Mechanism for Coordinated Control of Air Pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Meteorological and Environmental Research. 2022(01): 43-48 . 必应学术
    4. 王琰玮，王媛，张增凯，张蓝心，单梅. 不同季节天津市PM_(2.5)与O_3潜在源区及传输路径分析. 环境科学研究. 2022(03): 673-682 . 百度学术
    5. 白宇，李源，郭瑞，孔君，刘彬. 气象因子对天津市臭氧浓度的影响分析. 环境影响评价. 2022(02): 14-19 . 百度学术
    6. 王玲玲，陈婷，邹长武，罗伟. 自贡市城区MAIAC AOD和PM2.5时空特征及气象因素分析. 湖北农业科学. 2022(21): 39-44+72 . 百度学术
    7. 李源，陆彦彬，白宇，杨宁，高璟赟，董海燕，孔君，刘彬. 基于天津臭氧污染特点的气象条件与天气分型研究. 中国环境监测. 2022(05): 56-64 . 百度学术
    8. 但扬彬，胡恭任，卞雅慧，陈衍婷，陈进生，王珊珊，于瑞莲. 漳州大气PM_(2.5)污染特征与区域传输影响分析. 地球与环境. 2021(02): 134-146 . 百度学术
    9. 苏明伟，张伟峰，郑润禾. 基于小波分析的PM_(2.5)分布特征及差异分析. 环境工程. 2021(05): 96-103 . 本站查看
    10. 张敬巧，罗达通，方小云，王涵，王少博，刘锐泽，王淑兰. 廊坊经济技术开发区冬季PM_(2.5)化学组成特征及来源分析. 环境污染与防治. 2021(10): 1297-1303 . 百度学术
    11. 刘姣姣，陈思，赵洁，叶堤. 重庆市PM_(2.5)污染特征分析及预报结果评估. 环境科学与技术. 2020(06): 85-93 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(9)

    • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  174
  • HTML全文浏览量:  33
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 20
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-18
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-21

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(20)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    期刊在线

    作者中心

    友情链接

    版权所有 ©《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 设计开发   百度统计