CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
JST China 收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析

汪心雯,  刘子琦,  郭琼琼,  李渊,  李开萍,  张尘月

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 环境工程  > 2021 >  39(9): 69-75
汪心雯, 刘子琦, 郭琼琼, 李渊, 李开萍, 张尘月. 贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
引用本文: 汪心雯, 刘子琦, 郭琼琼, 李渊, 李开萍, 张尘月. 贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
shu
WANG Xin-wen, LIU Zi-qi, GUO Qiong-qiong, LI Yuan, LI Kai-ping, ZHANG Chen-yue. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
Citation: WANG Xin-wen, LIU Zi-qi, GUO Qiong-qiong, LI Yuan, LI Kai-ping, ZHANG Chen-yue. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
shu

贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011

  • 1. 贵州师范大学 喀斯特研究院, 贵阳 550001;

  • 2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心, 贵阳 550001

基金项目: 

国家十三五重点研发计划课题（2016YFC0502606）；贵州省科技计划重大专项（黔科合平台人才[2017]5411）；贵州省科技计划项目（黔科合平台人才[2017]5726-28号）。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    汪心雯(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事喀斯特石漠化治理研究。wangxinwen97@126.com

    通讯作者:

    刘子琦(1979-),女,博士,副教授,主要从事自然地理学、喀斯特地貌与洞穴、石漠化综合治理与喀斯特环境演变研究。michelle-lily@163.com

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU

  • 1. School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;

  • 2. State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China

    摘要
  • 摘要: 黄洲河是施秉喀斯特世界自然遗产地内重要河流之一。为了解黄洲河水质特征，基于8个样点、7个监测指标、12个月监测数据，采用单因子水质标识指数法、均值型综合污染指数法，结合聚类分析、主成分分析方法对河流水质特征进行分析评价。结果表明：黄洲河TN超标较严重，TP潜在超标性强。遗产地核心区地表水未达到GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅰ类水质标准，缓冲区未达到Ⅲ类水质标准；丰水期水质最差，枯水期水质最优。丰水期主控因素为TP、NTU和NH3-N；平水期主控因素为CODMn、Chl-a和DO；枯水期主控因素为NH3-N。流域内主要污染形式为农业面源污染；上游和中游缓冲区居民生活用水和农村散养畜禽排泄物排放污染造成了黄洲河泉眼（Y1）、支流交汇点（Y2）点重污染的现状，而且污染会随河流运移，进入自然遗产地核心区。
    Abstract: The Huangzhouhe River is one of the important rivers in the Shibing Karst Word Natural Heritage Site. In order to know the water quality characteristics of the Huangzhouhe River, single factor water quality identification index, mean-type comprehensive pollution index, cluster analysis and principal component analysis were used to analyze and evaluate the river water quality characteristics, based on 8 sample points, 7 monitoring indicators and 12-month monitoring data. The results showed that TN to excessive emission standard was severe in the river, and TP excessive potential was strong. Water quality in heritage site's core area didn't meet the class I standard, and that in the buffer zone was inferior to class Ⅲ water quality standard. The water quality was worse in high water period and better in low water period. TP, NTU and NH3-N were the main controlling factors in the wet season. CODMn, Chl-a and DO were the main control factors in the leveling period. The main controlling factor in the dry season was NH3-N. The main form of pollution in the basin was agricultural non-point source pollution. The current situation of heavy pollution of the monitoring point, Y1 and Y2 were caused by the domestic water of residents in the upstream and midstream buffer zones and pollution discharge of livestock and poultry excrement in rural areas. Moreover, the pollution will migrate with the river and enter the core area of the natural heritage site.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(32)
  • [1] ADRIANO B,RITA T,WILLIAM J W.A water quality index applied to an international shared river basin:the case of the Douro River[J].Environmental Management,2006,38(6):910-920.
    [2] LI B,YANG G S,WAN R R,et al.Using fuzzy theory and variable weights for water quality evaluation in Poyang Lake,China[J].Chinese.Geographical Science,2017,27(1):39-51.
    [3] XIA R,CHEN Z.Integrated water-quality assessment of the Huai River Basin in China[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2015,20(2):5014018.
    [4] 王薇,王中玉,白小晶,等.北方典型城市不同类型河流的水质空间分布与相关性分析[J].环境工程,2019,37(9):50-56.
    [5] HELENA B,PARDO R,VEGA M,et al.Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga river,Spain) by principal component analysis[J].Water Research,2000,34:807-816.
    [6] SINGH K P,MALIK A,MOHAN D,et al.Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India):a case study[J].Water Research,2004,38:3980-3992.
    [7] SHRESTHA S,KAZAMA F.Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques:a case study of the Fuji river basin,Japan[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2007,22(4):464-475.
    [8] 赵建国,李洪波,李霄宇,等.永定河怀来段水质污染特征及污染源解析[J].环境科学与技术,2018,41(增刊1):299-306.
    [9] 林涛,徐盼盼,钱会,等.黄河宁夏段水质评价及其污染源分析[J].环境化学,2017,36(6):1388-1396.
    [10] 张涛,陈求稳,易齐涛,等.太湖流域上游平原河网区水质空间差异与季节变化特征[J].湖泊科学,2017,29(6):1300-1311.
    [11] 何江湖,肖时珍,曾成,等.湿润亚热带典型白云岩流域的化学剥蚀速率:以贵州施秉黄洲河流域为例[J].地球与环境,2018,46(3):274-281.
    [12] 陈品冬,肖时珍.施秉世界自然遗产地景观美学特征及价值提升研究[J].中国地名,2019(7):51-53.
    [13] 顾秉谦,周明忠,肖时珍,等.贵州施秉世界自然遗产地喀斯特地貌的地质控制研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(10):132-138.
    [14] 贵州省住房和城乡建设厅.国家遗产预备名录:自然遗产-施秉喀斯特[R].2009.
    [15] 张尘月,刘子琦,刘肇军,等.喀斯特地区平水期水质污染综合分析:以贵州省白云岩喀斯特世界自然遗产地为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):253-259.
    [16] 楼文高,熊聘.长江水系水质综合评价、预测的投影寻踪建模与实证研究[J].地球环境学报,2014,5(5):344-352.
    [17] 胡必彬.欧盟水环境标准体系[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(1):45-48.
    [18] 徐祖信.我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(3):321-325.
    [19] 吴旌滔,安艳玲,吴起鑫,等.贵州三岔河水质时空分布特征与评价[J].环境与健康杂志,2016,33(3):229-231.
    [20] 刘贤梅,周忠发,张昊天,等.基于主成分分析的喀斯特山区河流水质评价及水质时空特征分析:以贵州省张维河为例[J].环境工程,2019,37(10):49-54

    ,132.
    [21] 黄健平,宋新山,李海华.环境影响评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2013.
    [22] OBST U.Strategies of maintaining the natural purification potential of rivers and lakes[J].Environmental Science & Pollution Research International,2003,10:251-255.
    [23] SEITZINGER S P,STYLES R V,BOYER E W,et al.Nitrogen retention in rivers:model development and application to water-sheds in the northeastern U.S.A[J].Biogeochemistry,2002,57/58:199-237.
    [24] VAGNETTI R,MIANA P,FABRIS M,et al.Self-purification ability of a resurgence stream[J].Chemosphere,2003,52:1781-1795.
    [25] ZHOU S,XIA C,HUANG T,et al.Seasonal variation of potential denitrification rate and enhanced denitrification performance via water-lifting aeration technology in a stratified reservoir:a case study of Zhoucun reservoir[J].Chemosphere,2018,211:1123-1136.
    [26] 徐华山,徐宗学,唐芳芳,等.漳卫南运河流域水质时空变化特征及其污染源识别[J].环境科学,2012,33(2):359-369.
    [27] SU S L,ZHI J J,LOU L P,et al.Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of pollution in Qiantang River (China) using neural-based modeling and multivariate statistical techniques[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2011,36(9/10/11/12):379-386.
    [28] JARVIE H P,WHITTON B A,NEAL C.Nitrogen and phosphorus in east-coast British rivers:speciation,sources and biological significance[J].Science of the Total Environment,1998,S210/211(1/6):79-109.
    [29] BOYACIOGLU H,BOYACIOGLU H.Water pollution sources assessment by multivariate statistical methods in the Tahtali Basin,Turkey[J].Environmental Geology,2008,54(2):275-282.
    [30] DAI Q H,LIU Z T,SHAO H B,et al.Karst bare slope soil erosion and soil quality:a simulation case study[J].Solid Earth,2015,6:985-995.
    [31] DAI Q H,PENG X D,YANG Z,et al.Runoff and erosion processes on bare slopes in the karst rocky desertification area[J].Catena,2017,152:218-226.
    [32] 张宜松,曹国良,张萌.基于主成分分析法的陕北地区可持续发展对比研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(5):136-140.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  145
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-09-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    期刊在线

    作者中心

    友情链接

    版权所有 ©《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 设计开发   百度统计