钢铁高炉煤气二氧化碳捕集技术经济性分析

李飒; 林千果; 梁希; 雷明; 江梦菲; 杨永智

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202109017

钢铁高炉煤气二氧化碳捕集技术经济性分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109017

李飒¹,
林千果^1,2, ,,
梁希²,
雷明³,
江梦菲²,
杨永智⁴

1. 华北电力大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京 102206;
2. 英国爱丁堡大学商学院, 英国爱丁堡 EH8 9YL;
3. 北京大学光华管理学院, 北京 100871;
4. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083

基金项目:

必和必拓-北京大学碳捕集、利用与封存（钢铁行业）研究项目；国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0600803-02）。

详细信息

作者简介:
李飒,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存。lisa@ncepu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
林千果,博士,教授,主要研究方向为二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存。qianguo.lin@gmail.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 276
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-10-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-21

TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE OF IRON AND STEEL BLAST FURNACE GAS

1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. Business School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH89 YL, UK;
3. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration&Development, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 基于固定单一原料气量导向、固定碳捕集量导向和固定混合原料气量导向3种不同的碳捕集情景，结合不同捕集技术CO₂捕集率与CO₂产品纯度的变化，分析了CO₂捕集对于高炉煤气热值提升的间接经济效益的影响。结果表明：当CO₂捕集率和CO₂产品纯度均一定时，基于固定单一原料气量导向较基于固定碳捕集量导向情景捕集单位质量CO₂提升的热值效益更高；当CO₂捕集率一定时，随着CO₂产品纯度降低，基于固定单一原料气量导向情景与基于固定碳捕集量导向情景捕集单位质量CO₂提升的热值效益均更高；当CO₂产品纯度一定时，随着CO₂捕集率降低，基于固定单一原料气量导向情景捕集单位质量CO₂的热值提升效益越高，而基于固定碳捕集量导向情景捕集单位质量CO₂提升的热值效益降低。
- 高炉煤气 /
- 碳捕集 /
- 煤气热值 /
- 技术经济性
Abstract: In this study, three carbon capture scenarios were designed, namely fixed quantity raw gas scenario, fixed carbon capture amount scenario, and mixed raw gas scenario. Cases reflecting different CO₂ capture rates and product purity associated with different capture technologies were further designed under each scenario. The impacts of CO₂ capture on the economic benefits of calorific value variation of blast furnace gas were analyzed. When the CO₂ capture rate and CO₂ product purity were equal, the calorific value of CO₂ per unit based on the fixed quantity raw gas scenario was higher than that under the fixed carbon capture amount scenario. When the CO₂ capture rate was fixed, with the reduction of CO₂ product purity, the calorific value benefits of CO₂ per unit mass based on the fixed quantity raw gas scenario and the fixed carbon capture amount scenario were both higher. When the purity of CO₂ product was fixed, with the reduction of CO₂ capture rate, the calorific value of fixed quantity raw gas scenario increased in efficiency, while the calorific value of the fixed carbon capture amount scenario decreased in efficiency.
- blast furnace gas /
- CO₂ capture /
- calorific value of gas /
- technical and economic

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

[1]	ZHAO G,GAO X,WANG Z R,et al.A mechanism model for accurately estimating carbon emissions on a micro scale of iron-making system[J].ISIJ International,2019,59(2):381-390.
[2]	ARASTO A,TSUPARI E,KÄRKI J,et al.Costs and potential of carbon capture and storage at an integrated steel mill[J].Energy Procedia,2013,37:7117-7124.
[3]	RAMÍREZ S,ÁLVARO A,CASTEL C,et al.Utilization of blast furnace flue gas:opportunities and challenges for polymeric membrane gas separation processes[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2017,526:191-204.
[4]	HO M T,BUSTAMANTE A,WILEY D E.Comparison of CO₂ capture economics for iron and steel mills[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2013,19:145-159.
[5]	郭玉华.高炉煤气净化提质利用技术现状及未来发展趋势[J].钢铁研究学报,2020,32(7):525-531.
[6]	卢维强,张俊杰,段国建,等.解决中天钢铁高炉炉壳上涨实践[J].钢铁,2020,55(2):42.
[7]	易正明,胡绪满,周正,等.贫煤与煤气混烧锅炉掺烧试验[J].哈尔滨理工大学学报,2020,25(3):102-108.
[8]	尹志强.锅炉烟气余热利用系统分析与优化对策[J].冶金管理,2020(7):208-209.
[9]	Anne C.CO₂ a batement in the iron and steel industry[J].Energy & Fuels,2012,77(1):43.
[10]	刘博文,邓帅,李双俊,等.面向碳捕集系统的碳中性评价:研究框架及方法[J].环境工程,2019,37(1):192-197.
[11]	江文敏.化学吸收法捕集二氧化碳工艺的模拟及实验研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.
[12]	方梦祥,狄闻韬,易宁彤,等.CO₂化学吸收系统污染物排放与控制研究进展[J].洁净煤技术,2020(6):1-9.
[13]	LIANG Z W,FU K Y,RAPHAEL I,et al.Review on current advances,future challenges and consideration issues for post-combustion CO₂ capture using amine-based absorbents[J].Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2016,24(2):278-288.
[14]	王键,杨剑,王中原,等.全球碳捕集与封存发展现状及未来趋势[J].环境工程,2012,30(4):118-120.
[15]	林海周,裴爱国,方梦祥.燃煤电厂烟气二氧化碳胺法捕集工艺改进研究进展[J].化工进展,2018,37(12):4874-4886.
[16]	韩永嘉,王树立,张鹏宇,等.CO₂分离捕集技术的现状与进展[J].天然气工业,2009,29(12):79-82.
[17]	徐冬,张军,翟玉春,等.变压吸附分离工业废气中二氧化碳的研究进展[J].化工进展,2010,29(1):150-156 ,162.
[18]	陈旭,杜涛,李刚,等.吸附工艺在碳捕集中的应用现状.中国电机工程学报,2019,39(增刊1):155-163.
[19]	郭智,张新妙,章晨林,等.膜分离法分离煤气中CO₂材料及应用研究进展[J].现代化工,2016,36(6):42-45 ,47.
[20]	孙亚伟,谢美连,刘庆岭,等.膜法分离燃煤电厂烟气中CO₂的研究现状及进展[J].化工进展,2017,36(5):1880-1889.
[21]	龚之宝,孙伟振,李朋洲,等.无机膜分离技术及其研究进展[J].应用化工,2019,48(8):1985-1989.
[22]	PARK H B,KAMCEV J,ROBESON L M,et al.Maximizing the right stuff:the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity[J].Science,2017,356(6343):1138-1148.
[23]	马光宇,李卫东,张天赋,等.高炉煤气锅炉与CCPP的发电经济性比较[J].冶金能源,2018,37(6):11-14.
[24]	徐志钢,樊响,周景伟,等.高炉煤气脱硫可行性工艺路线研究[J/OL].环境工程,http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2097.X.20191108.1429.004.html.[2020-10-19].