钝化剂对农田土壤Cd有效性及不同水稻品种吸收Cd的研究

李翔; 杨驰浩; 刘晔; 张敏; 孙小峰; 周宇澄; 尹微琴; 王圣森; 王小治

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202109030

钝化剂对农田土壤Cd有效性及不同水稻品种吸收Cd的研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109030

1. 扬州大学环境科学与工程学院, 江苏扬州 225000;
2. 扬州高邮市农业农村局, 江苏高邮 225600;
3. 江苏瑞沃建设集团有限公司, 江苏高邮 225600

基金项目:

江苏省安全利用与治理修复试点示范项目；江苏省现代农业项目（BE2018328）；江苏省六大人才高峰创新团队项目（2018-TD-JNHB-012）。

详细信息

作者简介:
李翔(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农田重金属污染修复。fp3000@qq.com

通讯作者:
王小治(1975-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为水土环境修复。xzwang@yzu.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 308
- HTML全文浏览量: 43
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-11
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-21

EFFECT OF PASSIVATORS ON Cd AVAILABILITY IN FARMLAND SOIL AND Cd UPTAKE BY DIFFERENT RICE VARIETIES

1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China;
2. Gaoyou Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Gaoyou 225600, China;
3. Jiangsu Ruiwo Construction Group, Gaoyou 225600, China

摘要

摘要: 为从源头保障农产品质量安全，做好农田土壤镉污染修复，在镉污染农田上研究施加TX土壤调理剂、NL土壤调理剂、生物炭、石灰、硅肥5种钝化剂对土壤pH、有机质、Cd有效态含量、Cd不同形态的影响，并探讨钝化剂对4个不同水稻品种的产量以及水稻各器官吸收Cd的影响，筛选降解Cd效果较优的钝化剂和籽粒吸收Cd较少的水稻品种。结果表明：与对照处理相比，施加TX、NL土壤调理剂、生物炭、石灰、硅肥处理土壤中Cd有效态含量分别降低了59.4%、29.9%、22.8%、22.4%、54.4%。施加钝化剂降低了土壤中弱酸提取态和可还原态含量，增加了可氧化态和残渣态含量。其中，TX土壤调理剂处理的弱酸提取态占比降幅最大为11.9%，残渣态占比增幅最大为15.4%。施加钝化剂可提高水稻产量和抑制水稻各器官（根、茎、籽粒）对Cd的积累，其中施加TX土壤调理剂的效果最优，淮稻5号、扬粳805、扬粳103、南粳9108的产量分别提高了14.2%、18.6%、9.2%、29.2%，籽粒中Cd含量分别显著降低了80.5%、82.8%、65.4%、55.6%。对照处理中，淮稻5号、扬粳805、扬粳103、南粳9108籽粒Cd含量分别为0.836，0.853，1.047，1.22 mg/kg。只有种植淮稻5号和扬粳805同时配施TX土壤调理剂处理，籽粒Cd含量分别为0.163，0.147 mg/kg，符合GB 2762—2017《食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量》。推荐淮稻5号和扬粳805品种为适应于苏中地区的重金属低积累水稻品种，再结合施用合适钝化剂可在重金属Cd中轻度污染土壤上推广应用以保障农产品安全。
- 钝化剂 /
- 镉 /
- 生物有效性 /
- 水稻 /
- 土壤修复
Abstract: In order to ensure the quality and safety of agricultural products from the source and repair cadmium pollution in farmland soil, field experiments were carried out on cadmium contaminated farmland soil. The effects of applying five different passivators such as TX,NL soil conditioner, biochar, lime and silicon fertilizer on soil pH, organic matter, available state content of Cd and different forms of Cd were studied, and the effects of the passivators on the yield of four different rice varieties and Cd accumulation in rice organs were discussed. The results showed that compared with the control, after the application of TX, NL soil conditioner, biochar, lime and silicon fertilizer, the available Cd content in soil was decreased by 59.4%, 29.9%, 22.8%, 22.4% and 54.4% respectively. Applying passivator could improve rice yield and inhibit accumulation of Cd in rice organs. When rice variaties of Huaidao 5 or Yangjing 805 treated together with TX soil conditioner, the grain Cd content was 0.163 mg/kg or 0.147 mg/kg, respectively, which achieved the safety and quality standard of agricultural products (China's national standard, GB 2762-2017). The results indicated that two rice varieties of Huaidao 5 and Yangjing 805 were more preferable for low accumulation of Cd in the middle area of Jiangsu, and for planting in moderately Cd polluted soil, in combination with application of appropriate passivators.
- amendments /
- cadmium /
- bioavailability /
- rice /
- soil remediation

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	HE Z L,YANG X E,STOFFELLA P J.Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment[J].Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine Biology,2005,19(2/3):125-140.
[2]	李涛.重金属污染下土壤重金属元素异常成因机理研究[J].世界有色金属,2019(9):294-295.
[3]	陈能场,郑煜基,何晓峰,等.《全国土壤污染状况调查公报》探析[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(9):1689-1692.
[4]	王玉军,吴同亮,周东美,等.农田土壤重金属污染评价研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(12):2365-2378.
[5]	周静,崔红标,梁家妮,等.重金属污染土壤修复技术的选择和面临的问题:以江铜贵冶九牛岗土壤修复示范工程项目为例[J].土壤,2015,47(2):283-288.
[6]	王林,徐应明,孙国红,等.海泡石和磷酸盐对镉铅污染稻田土壤的钝化修复效应与机理研究[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(2):314-320.
[7]	黎大荣,吴丽香,宁晓君,等.不同钝化剂对土壤有效态铅和镉含量的影响[J].环境保护科学,2013,39(3):46-49.
[8]	韩云昌,张乃明.施用钝化剂对土壤重金属污染修复的研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(10):52-56.
[9]	王林,徐应明,梁学峰,等.新型杂化材料钝化修复镉铅复合污染土壤的效应与机制研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(2):581-588.
[10]	孙翠平,李彦,张英鹏,等.农田重金属钝化剂研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(8):147-153.
[11]	许剑臣,李晔,肖华锋,等.改良剂对重金属复合污染土壤的修复效果[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(12):6511-6517.
[12]	葛华.土壤重金属污染及其修复技术研究进展[J].绿色环保建材,2020(6):34-35.
[13]	张传琦.土壤中重金属砷、镉、铅、铬、汞有效态浸提剂的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2011.
[14]	QUEVAUVILLER P,RAURET G,GRIEPINK B.Single and Sequential Extraction in Sediments and Soils[J].International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry,1993,51(1/2/3/4):231-235.
[15]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[16]	杨秀敏,任广萌,李立新,等.土壤pH值对重金属形态的影响及其相关性研究[J].中国矿业,2017,26(6):79-83.
[17]	乔雪,卢海军,刘姝,等.齐齐哈尔市主城区道路绿地土壤重金属、pH、有机质含量及相关性研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2018,59(2):30-32 ,40.
[18]	罗远恒,顾雪元,吴永贵,等.钝化剂对农田土壤镉污染的原位钝化修复效应研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(5):890-897.
[19]	金晓丹,马华菊,曾广庆,等.新型土壤改良剂修复水体-土壤复合重金属污染效果及机理探讨[J].环境工程,2019,37(5):17-22.
[20]	徐粲然,卢滇楠,刘永民.生物钝化修复镉污染土壤研究进展[J].化工进展,2014,33(8):2174-2179.
[21]	许晓玲,呼世斌,刘晋波,等.施用污泥堆肥对土壤中重金属累积和大豆产量的影响[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):108-111.
[22]	王玉环,林青,徐绍辉.常规阳离子存在时Mg-Al-CO₃ LDH对土壤中Cd吸附迁移的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(9):2129-2137.
[23]	彭鸥,刘玉玲,铁柏清,等.施硅对镉胁迫下水稻镉吸收和转运的调控效应[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1049-1056.
[24]	HUANG H L,RIZWAN M,Li M,et al.Comparative efficacy of organic and inorganic silicon fertilizers on antioxidant response,Cd/Pb accumulation and health risk assessment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J].Environmental Pollution,2019,255(Pt 1):113146.
[25]	MAO P,ZHUANG P,LI F,et al.Phosphate addition diminishes the efficacy of wollastonite in decreasing Cd uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.) in paddy soil[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,687:441-450.
[26]	刘伟,张永波,贾亚敏.重金属污染农田植物修复及强化措施研究进展[J].环境工程,2019,37(5):29-33.
[27]	胡雪芳,田志清,梁亮,等.不同改良剂对铅镉污染农田水稻重金属积累和产量影响的比较分析[J].环境科学,2018,39(7):3409-3417.