二氧化碳排放达峰期、平台期及下降期定量判断方法研究

张立; 万昕; 蒋含颖; 李璇; 徐少东; 蔡博峰

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202110001

二氧化碳排放达峰期、平台期及下降期定量判断方法研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110001

张立^1,2,
万昕³,
蒋含颖⁴,
李璇⁵,
徐少东⁵,
蔡博峰^1, ,

1. 生态环境部环境规划院碳达峰碳中和研究中心, 北京 100012;
2. 加州大学洛杉矶分校环境与可持续发展研究所, 加利福尼亚州, 90095;
3. 上海交通大学中英国际低碳学院, 上海 201306;
4. 清华大学环境学院, 北京 100091;
5. 中国人民大学统计学院, 北京 100872

基金项目:

中国工程院咨询研究项目"江西碳达峰与碳中和模式与实现路径研究"（2021-01JXZD-06）。

详细信息

作者简介:
张立(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为温室气体达峰和空气质量达标。lizhang1122@g.ucla.edu

通讯作者:
蔡博峰(1977-),男,博士,研究员,主要研究方向为温室气体清单。caibf@caep.org.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 331
- HTML全文浏览量: 47
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-01
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-26

QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION ON THE STATUS OF CO₂ EMISSIONS: PEAK PERIOD, PLATEAU PERIOD, AND DECLINE PERIOD

1. Center for Carbon Neutrality, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China;
2. Institute of Environment and Sustainability, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles 90095, United States;
3. Low Carbon College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201306, China;
4. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100091, China;
5. School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

摘要

摘要: 基于Bootstrap数理统计方法，构建二氧化碳排放状态判断方法模型（evaluation model on the status of CO₂ emissions，ESC）。选取排放统计基础较好的地区，利用权威机构的多源长时间序列数据，结合IPCC清单指南确定和分析二氧化碳排放数据的分布特征，包括标准差和不确定性范围（取95%置信区间），以此作为建立碳排放达峰期、平台期及下降期的定量判断的基础，解决因核算、计量方法的不同造成排放结果的误差。研究结果表明，达峰期判断需要以峰值排放量浮动1%（0.9%~1.1%）的范围为依据，若碳排放量满足条件，则认为处于达峰期；平台期和下降期则以达峰后排放量的连续多年的年均下降率与2%（1.8%~2.2%）比较，若碳达峰后排放量的年均下降率小于2%，则认为碳排放仍处于平台期，否则认为碳排放处于下降期。基于ESC模型对欧盟和美国的历史碳排放数据进行排放状态判断，结果显示，欧盟地区在1979年碳排放达峰后，在1980-1983年进入下降期。美国在2007年碳达峰后，在2008-2012年进入下降期。ESC模型的分析结果与2个地区的排放趋势呈高度一致，表明该模型可以作为国家、地区（省份）、城市CO₂排放状态的定量判断方法，为碳排放路径分析和情景模拟研究提供重要支撑，为决策者提供科学的参考依据。
- 二氧化碳 /
- 排放状态 /
- 达峰期 /
- 平台期 /
- 下降期 /
- 定量判断
Abstract: Based on mathematical statistics methods of Bootstrap sampling, we constructed an Evaluation model on the Status of CO₂ emissions (ESC). This paper selected the areas with a good statistical basis, used multi-source time series data from the authorities, and combined with the emission uncertainty by referring to the IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories to explore the CO₂ emission distribution and statistical parameters, which included the standard deviation and uncertainty of the emission. The statistical parameters were used as a quantitative criterion to determine the peak, plateau, and decline period of CO₂ emission and solve the calculation errors caused by statistical accounting. Based on the ESC model, the peak period was within 1% (0.9%~1.1%) of peak CO₂ emission. The plateau and decline period were evaluated based on the comparison between the annual decline rate and 2% (1.8%~2.2%). Once the annual decline rate after the CO₂ emission peak exceeded 2%, we assumed the CO₂ emission to be the decline period, otherwise the plateau period. Besides, we applied the ESC model to evaluate the periods of historical CO₂ emission for the European Union and the United States. The results showed that:the European Union reached the CO₂ emission peak in 1979, then entered the decline period from 1980 to 1983; the United States reached the CO₂ emission peak in 2007, then entered the decline period of CO₂ emission from 2008 to 2012; our model was reasonable on quantitative evaluation on the status of CO₂ emission peak. This study could provide reference value for quantitative evaluation on the status of CO₂ emission (including the peak, plateau, and decline period) for the country, region (province), or the city, provide sound support for studies on the pathway analysis and scenario simulation of CO₂ emission, and offer scientific evaluation reference for decision makers.
- CO₂ /
- emission status /
- peak period /
- plateau period /
- decline period /
- quantitative evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(44)

[1]	CHINA NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT and REFORM COMMISSION of China's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution Document[EB/OL]. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx.2015[2020-05-14].
[2]	国务院. 国务院关于印发"十三五"控制温室气体排放工作方案的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-11/04/content_5128619.htm.2016[2020-05-14].
[3]	张立, 谢紫璇, 曹丽斌,等. 中国城市碳达峰评估方法初探[J]. 环境工程,2020:38(11):1-5 ,43.
[4]	WRI. Mitigation Goal Standard.[EB/OL]. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/mitigation-goal-standard.2014.
[5]	C40. 27 Cities Have Reached Peak Greenhouse Gas Emissions whilst Populations Increase and Economies Grow[EB/OL]. https://www.c40.org/press_releases/27-cities-have-reached-peak-greenhouse-gas-emissions-whilst-populations-increase-and-economies-grow.20182020-05-14.
[6]	UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). The Emissions Gap Report 2018[R]. Nairobi:UNEP, 2018[2021-05-14].https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2018.
[7]	SU K, LEE C M. When will China achieve its carbon emission peak? A scenario analysis based on optimal control and the STIRPAT model[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,112:106138.
[8]	何建坤. CO₂排放峰值分析:中国的减排目标与对策[J]. 中国人口资源与环境,2013,23(12):1-9.
[9]	TAPIO P. Towards a theory of decoupling:degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy,2005,12:137-151.
[10]	SHI C X. Decoupling analysis and peak prediction of carbon emission based on decoupling theory[J]. Sustainable Computing:Informatics and Systems,2020,28:100424.
[11]	LI H A, QIN Q D. Challenges for China's carbon emissions peaking in 2030:a decomposition and decoupling analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,207:857-865.
[12]	SU Y Q, LIU X, JI J P, et al. Role of economic structural change in the peaking of China's CO₂ emissions:an input-output optimization model[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,761:143306.
[13]	CUI C, WANG Z, CAI B F, et al. Evolution-based CO₂ emission baseline scenarios of Chinese cities in 2025[J]. Applied Energy,2021,281:116116.
[14]	WANG Z H, HUANG W J, CHEN Z F. The peak of CO₂ emissions in China:a new approach using survival models[J]. Energy Economics,2019,81:1099-1108.
[15]	CHEN X, SHUAI C Y, WU Y, et al. Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,709:135768.
[16]	DONG K Y, SUN R J, LI H, et al. Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO₂ emissions:Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2018,94:419-429.
[17]	SHEN L Y, WU Y, SHUAI C Y, et al. Analysis on the evolution of low carbon city from process characteristic perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,187:348-360.
[18]	DES PARTICIPANTS LISTE. Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories[EB/OL]. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/english/.2001.
[19]	IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories[EB/OL]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/.2019.
[20]	蒋含颖, 段祎然, 张哲,等. 基于统计学的中国典型大城市CO₂排放达峰研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2021,17(2):131-139.
[21]	EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. National emissions reported to the UNFCCC and to the EU Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Mechanism[EB/OL]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/national-emissions-reported-to-the-unfccc-and-to-the-eu-greenhouse-gas-monitoring-mechanism-16.2020.
[22]	WORLD BANK. World Development Indicators[EB/OL]. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#iallsectors/carbondioxide/inventsect/all.2021.
[23]	INTEGRATED CARBON OBSERVATION SYSTEM. Data supplement to the Global Carbon Budget 2020[EB/OL]. https://www.icos-cp.eu/science-and-impact/global-carbon-budget/2020.2020.
[24]	INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY IEA. Emissions from Fuel Combustion[EB/OL]. http://wds.iea.org/wds/pdf/Worldco2_Documentation.pdf.2020.
[25]	BRITISH PETROLEUM. Statistical Review of World Energy[EB/OL]. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.2021.
[26]	EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research[EB/OL]. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=booklet2020.2020.
[27]	CLIMATE WATCH. Data Explorer-historical emissions[EB/OL]. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/data-explorer/historical-emissions?historical-emissions-data-sources=cait&historical-emissions-end_year=2018&historical-emissions-gases=co2&historical-emissions-regions=All%20Selected%2CCHN&historical-emissions-sectors=total-excluding-lucf&historical-emissions-start_year=1990&page=1.2020.
[28]	OUR WORLD IN DATA. United States:CO₂ Country Profile[EB/OL]. https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/united-states?country=~USA. 2020.
[29]	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer[EB/OL]. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#iallsectors/carbondioxide/inventsect/all.2021.
[30]	U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION. U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2019[EB/OL]. https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/.2021.
[31]	EFRON B. Bootstrap Methods:another Look at the Jackknife[J]. The Annals of Statistics,1979,7:1-26.
[32]	CHERNICK M R. Bootstrap Methods:A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers[M]. USA:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011.
[33]	HONG M, HWANG E. Bootstrap inference for network vector autoregression in large-scale social network[J]. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society,2021,4:1-21.
[34]	IIZUMI T, TAKAYABU I, DAIRAKU K, et al. Future change of daily precipitation indices in Japan:a stochastic weather generator-based bootstrap approach to provide probabilistic climate information[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,2012,117(D11).
[35]	KOKIC P, JIN H, CRIMP S. Improved point scale climate projections using a block bootstrap simulation and quantile matching method[J]. Climate Dynamics,2013,41(3/4):853-866.
[36]	YURTKURAN S. The effect of agriculture, renewable energy production, and globalization on CO₂ emissions in Turkey:a Bootstrap ARDL Approach[J]. Renewable Energy,2021,171:1236-1245.
[37]	YILANCI V, HAOUAS I, OZGUR O, et al. Energy diversification and economic development in emergent countries:evidence from fourier function-driven bootstrap panel causality test[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research,2021,9:95.
[38]	TONG T, ORTIZ J, XU C, et al. Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in the E7 countries:a bootstrap ARDL bound test[J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society,2020,10(1):1-17.
[39]	CHAABOUNI S. China's regional tourism efficiency:a two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management,2019,11:183-191.
[40]	PARRELLA M L, ALBANO G, PERNA C, et al. Bootstrap joint prediction regions for sequences of missing values in spatio-temporal datasets[J]. Computational Statistics,2021:1-22.
[41]	MARINHO A, ARAU'JO C A S. Using data envelopment analysis and the bootstrap method to evaluate organ transplantation efficiency in Brazil[J]. Health Care Management Science,2021,24:569-581.
[42]	SONG M L, ZHANG L L, LIU W, et al. Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS' energy efficiency based on small sample data[J]. Applied Energy,2013,112:1049-1055.
[43]	TIAN W, SONG J T, LI Z Y, et al. Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis[J]. Applied Energy,2014,135:320-328.
[44]	DUAN N, GUO J P, XIE B C. Is there a difference between the energy and CO₂ emission performance for China's thermal power industry? A bootstrapped directional distance function approach[J]. Applied Energy-Barking Then Oxford-,2016,162(1):1552-1563.