PILOT-SCALE OPTIMIZATION OF OZONE DOSAGE IN UP FLOW ACTIVATED CARBON-ULTRAFILTRATION COMBINED PROCESS
-
摘要: 为优化上向流活性炭-超滤组合工艺水厂中臭氧的投加,设计中试试验研究了臭氧投加量改变对各处理单元运行效果的影响,并利用Central Composite响应面设计研究了臭氧投加量对中试工艺去除TOC及三卤甲烷生成势(THMFP)的影响规律,同时简单分析了该中试工艺对金泽原水中常见微污染物的去除率。结果表明:过高的前置臭氧投加量不利于混凝沉淀单元对浊度、UV254及耗氧量的去除,过高的后置臭氧投加量不利于活性炭单元对UV254及耗氧量的去除。针对金泽原水TOC及THMFP的去除,优化后的中试工艺臭氧投加量为:前置臭氧投加量为0.6~0.65 mg/L,后置臭氧投加量为1.35~1.4 mg/L。在中试研究的臭氧投加量范围内,该中试工艺对金泽原水中常见抗生素及除1,4-二氯苯、乙苯外的致嗅物质均有很好的去除效果。Abstract: In order to optimize the ozone dosage in an up flow activated carbon-ultrafiltration combined process for the water works, pilot-scale experiments were conducted to study the impact of ozone dosages on the processing efficiency of each unit, and the central composite response surface design was adopted to study the effect of ozone dosage on TOC and trihalomethane formation potential (THMFP), meanwhile, the removal efficiency of typical odor compounds and antibiotics in Jinze Reservoir was also analyzed. The results showed that excessively high pre-ozone dosage was not conducive to the removal of turbidity, UV254 and CODMn in the coagulatory settler, while exceedingly high post-ozone dosage was not conducive to the removal of UV254 and CODMn in the activated carbon filter. For the removal of TOC and THMFP in Jinze Reservoir, the optimized ozone dosage range was 0.6~0.65 mg/L and 1.35~1.4 mg/L for the pre-ozone and post-ozone dosage, respectively. Moreover, the pilot-scale process was highly effective in removing typical antibiotics and odor compounds except 1,4-dichlorobenzene and ethylbenzene in Jinze reservoir.
-
Key words:
- ozonization /
- ozone dosage /
- up-flow activated carbon filter /
- coagulation precipitation
-
[1] 张平允, 刘慧杰, 倪奔, 等. 荷负电功能超滤膜组件饮用水深度处理工艺[J]. 净水技术, 2019, 38(12):74-78, 85. [2] 陈皓珅, 吴俊业, 沈恺乐, 等. 不同流向臭氧生物活性炭工艺对比分析[J]. 净水技术, 2020, 39(2):57-65. [3] 高俊贤, 阮智宇, 徐科威, 等. 臭氧氧化工艺对污水处理厂二级出水的处理特性[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(7):88-92. [4] 冯俊凯, 陶辉, 陈卫, 等. 不同水源下臭氧/生物活性炭运行参数的优化[J]. 中国给水排水, 2020, 36(9):47-51. [5] RODGER B B, ANDREW D E, EUGENE W R, et al. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 23rd Edition[M]. Denver:American Public Health Association, 2017. [6] YAN M Q, WANG D S, SHI B Y, et al. Effect of pre-ozonation on optimized coagulation of a typical North China source water[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(11):1695-1702. [7] HUERTA-FONTELA M, GALCERAN M T, VENTURA F. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and hormones through drinking water treatment[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(3):1432-1442. [8] SWIETLIK J, DABROWSKA A, RACZYK-STANISAWIAK U, et al. Reactivity of natural organic matter fractions with chlorine dioxide and ozone[J]. Water Research, 2004, 38(3):547-558. [9] MANSOUR F, AL-HINDI M, YAHFOUFI R, et al. The use of activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceuticals from aqueous solutions:a review[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2017, 17(1):109-145. [10] KUSIC H, PETERNEL I, KOPRIVANAC N, et al. Iron-activated persulfate oxidation of an azo dye in model wastewater:influence of iron activator type on process optimization[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011, 137(6):454-463.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 183
- HTML全文浏览量: 20
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0