中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
环境科学领域高质量科技期刊分级目录T2级期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国化学文摘社（CAS）数据库 收录期刊
日本JST China 收录期刊
世界期刊影响力指数（WJCI）报告 收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

某氯代烃污染场地地下水抽出方案优化

孙军亮,  宫志强,  李璐,  牛浩博,  殷乐宜,  陈坚

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 环境工程  > 2021 >  39(11): 172-178
陶亚, 陈宇轩, 赵喜亮, 杨丽标, 雷坤, 周刚. 基于EFDC模型的阿什河水环境容量季节性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(7): 65-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201707013
引用本文: 孙军亮, 宫志强, 李璐, 牛浩博, 殷乐宜, 陈坚. 某氯代烃污染场地地下水抽出方案优化[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(11): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111023
shu
SUN Jun-liang, GONG Zhi-qiang, LI Lu, NIU Hao-bo, YIN Le-yi, CHEN Jian. OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDWATER PUMPING SCHEME FOR A CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111023
Citation: SUN Jun-liang, GONG Zhi-qiang, LI Lu, NIU Hao-bo, YIN Le-yi, CHEN Jian. OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDWATER PUMPING SCHEME FOR A CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111023
shu

某氯代烃污染场地地下水抽出方案优化

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111023

  • 1. 生态环境部环境规划院 长江经济带生态环境联合研究中心, 北京 100012;

  • 2. 河北省地质环境监测院 河北省地质资源环境监测与保护重点实验室, 石家庄 050021

基金项目: 

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2018ZX07109-001）；国家重点研发计划"场地地下水污染快速识别与风险监测管控技术"（2019YFC1804803-01）。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孙军亮(1996-),男,硕士,主要从事地下水污染防治研究。1372047148@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    陈坚(1981-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事地下水污染防治研究。chenjian@caep.org.cn

OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDWATER PUMPING SCHEME FOR A CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED SITE

  • 1. Center for Ecological Environment in Yangtze River Economic Belt, Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China;

  • 2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Hebei Geological Environmental Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 以某氯代烃污染场地地下水抽出方案为研究对象，利用数值模拟结合遗传算法展开优化研究，抽出处理的修复目标为在抽出360 d后地下水中ρ（CCl4）<1500 μg/L，优化的目标函数为总抽出量最小。模拟优化结果显示：采用恒定抽出模式时初始备选井位于污染羽中轴线的方案优于均匀式的布井方案；将360 d分为2个阶段优化后的总抽出量相比于恒定抽出时减少了8.3%；阶段划分越多，优化后的总抽出量越少，抽出井个数越多；将360 d的抽出时间分为4个阶段优化后，总抽出量相比于2个阶段的抽出量减少了2.8%，但第4阶段单日抽出速率只有274 m3/d，在保持总抽出量不变的情况下，增大第4阶段抽出速率至814 m3/d，可以将抽出时间缩短至300 d。
    Abstract: Taking the groundwater pumping scheme of a chlorinated hydrocarbon-contaminated site as an example, this paper used a numerical model combined algorithm and carried out optimization. The aim of pump-and-treat technology was that carbon tetrachloride concentration of the groundwater was less than 1500 μg/L after continuous extraction for 360 days. The optimization objective function was that the minimum total extraction volume. The simulation and optimization results showed that extraction volume of the initial wells, located in the central axis of the contaminated plume, was better than that of the uniform distribution. We divided the 360 days into two stages, and found that the total extraction volume reduced by 8.3% compared with the constant model. After dividing the 360-day extraction time into four stages, the optimized total extraction volume was reduced by 2.8% compared with the two stages model. However, the pumping rate of the fourth stage was only 274 m3/d. When keeping the total extraction amount stable, increasing the extraction rate of the fourth stage to 814 m3/d could shorten the extraction time to 300 days.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(27)
  • [1] ROSNER D, MARKOWITZ G. Persistent pollutants:a brief history of the discovery of the widespread toxicity of chlorinated hydrocarbons[J]. Environmental Research, 2013, 120(1):126-133.
    [2] 高存荣, 王俊桃. 我国69个城市地下水有机污染特征研究[J]. 地球学报, 2011,32(5):581-591.
    [3] 宋震宇, 杨伟, 王文茜, 等. 氯代烃污染地下水修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2014, 39(4):104-106.
    [4] 宋汉周, ALLAN D W. 抽出处理措施的有效性评价:某碳酸盐岩含水层中地下水有机污染及其去除研究之三[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 28(4):67-98.
    [5] 蒲敏.污染场地地下水抽出处理技术研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(4):6-10.
    [6] 吴玉成. 治理地下水有机污染抽出处理技术影响因素分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1998, 25(1):27-29

    ,42.
    [7] 白相东, 张艳, 刘智荣, 等. 某冶炼厂污染场地抽出-处理技术优化方案研究[J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2012, 14(4):26-29.
    [8] 顾栩, 杜鹏, 单慧媚, 等. 水力截获技术在地下水污染修复中的应用:以某危险废物填埋场为例[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2014, 21(4):52-58.
    [9] 宫志强, 陈坚, 杨鑫鑫, 等. 某铬污染场地地下水抽水方案优化[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(5):1-3

    ,75.
    [10] HUANG C L, MAYER A S. Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables[J]. Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(5):1001-1012.
    [11] CHANG L C, CHU H J, HSIAO C T. Optimal planning of a dynamic pump-treat-inject groundwater remediation system[J]. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 342(3/4):295-304.
    [12] KAZEMZADEH-PARSI M J, DANESHAMAND F, AHMADFARD M A, et al. Optimal groundwater remediation design of pump and treat systems via a simulation-optimization approach and firefly algorithm[J]. Journal of Applied Stats, 2015, 47(1):1-17.
    [13] PARK Y C. Cost-effective optimal design of a pump-and-treat system for remediating groundwater contaminant at an industrial complex[J]. Geosciences Journal, 2016, 20(6):891-901.
    [14] AKBARPOUR A, ZEYNALI M J, TAHROUDI M N, et al. Locating optimal position of pumping wells in aquifer using meta-heuristic algorithms and finite element method[J]. Water Resources Management, 2020, 34(1):21-34.
    [15] 卞荣伟, 宋健, 孙晓敏,等.MGO软件在地下水污染抽出-处理方案优化中的应用[J]. 地下水, 2018,40(3):12-15.
    [16] BEAR J, SUN Y W. Optimization of pump-treat-inject (PTI) design for the remediation of a contaminated aquifer:multi-stage design with chance constraints[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1998, 29(3):225-244.
    [17] WANG Y, XIAO W H, WANG Y C, et al. Simulating-optimizing coupled method for pumping well layout at a nitrate-polluted groundwater site[J]. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental, 2018, 191(1):012071.
    [18] 张双圣. 基于不确定理论的地下水污染源识别及抽出-处理优化方法研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.
    [19] CHANG L C, CHU H J, HSIAO C T. Integration of optimal dynamic control and neural network for groundwater quality management[J]. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(5):1253-1269.
    [20] SADEGHFAM S, HASSANZADEH Y, KHATIBI R, et al. Groundwater remediation through pump-treat-inject technology using optimum control by artificial intelligence (OCAI)[J]. Water Resources Management, 2019, 33(3):1123-1145.
    [21] MAJUMDER P, ELDHO T I. Artificial neural network and grey wolf optimizer based surrogate simulation-optimization model for groundwater remediation[J]. Water Resources Management, 2020, 34(2):763-783.
    [22] BECKER D J, MINSKER B S, GREENWALD R, et al. Reducing long-term remedial costs by transport modeling optimization[J]. Ground Water, 2006, 44(6):864-875.
    [23] 姜烈, 何江涛, 姜永海, 等地下水硝酸盐污染抽出处理优化方法模拟研究[J]. 环境科学, 2014,35(7):2572-2578.
    [24] 万鹏, 张旭, 李广贺, 等.基于模拟-优化模型的某场地污染地下水抽水方案设计[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016,(29):1608-1616.
    [25] 罗建男, 李多强, 范越, 等. 某垃圾填埋场地下水质监测井网优化设计:基于模拟优化法[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(1):198-204.
    [26] ZHENG C,WANG P P.MGO:A Modular Groundwater Optimizer Incorporating MODFLOW/MT3DMS,Documentation and User's Guide[R].The University of Alabama and Groundwater Research Ltd, Tuscaloosa,AL,2003.
    [27] WANG M, ZHENG C. Optimal remediation policy selection under general conditions[J]. Ground Water, 1997, 35(5):757-764.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献

  • 期刊类型引用(0)

    其他类型引用(2)

    • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  240
  • HTML全文浏览量:  27
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 被引次数: 2
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-10-20
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-26

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(27)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    期刊在线

    作者中心

    友情链接

    版权所有 ©《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 设计开发   百度统计