电催化臭氧技术降解啶虫脒

马永双; 展巨宏; 王会姣; 王玉珏

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016

电催化臭氧技术降解啶虫脒

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016

1. 清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084;
2. 苏州普滤得净化股份有限公司, 江苏苏州 215129;
3. 清华苏州环境创新研究院, 江苏苏州 215163;
4. 中国矿业大学(北京)化学与环境工程学院, 北京 100083

基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07202-001)。

详细信息

作者简介:
马永双(1996-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为电化学高级氧化技术。mys18@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

通讯作者:
王玉珏(1975-),男,副教授,主要研究方向为水处理技术研究。wangyujue@tsinghua.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 125
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-12-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-30
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-30

STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS

1. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Suzhou Purification Equipment Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215129, China;
3. Research Institute for Environmental Innovation (Suzhou), Tsinghua University, Suzhou 215163, China;
4. School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 研究了臭氧氧化、紫外/臭氧(UV/O₃)和电催化臭氧(electro-peroxone, EP)3种技术降解啶虫脒的机制,比较了3种技术降解地下水和地表水中啶虫脒的效率和能耗(使用E_EO指标表征)。发现啶虫脒为臭氧难氧化物质,与臭氧(O₃)和羟基自由基(·OH)的二级反应速率常数分别为(0.05±0.01) mol/(L·s)、(2.8±0.2)×10⁹ mol/(L·s)。经6 min臭氧氧化后,地下水和地表水中的啶虫脒去除率仅为26%和64%。与之相比,UV/O₃和EP技术可以完全去除地下水和地表水中的啶虫脒。臭氧氧化、UV/O₃和EP技术降解啶虫脒的能耗分别为0.11~0.27,1.22~1.24,0.12~0.24 kW·h/m³。结果表明,EP技术是一种去除饮用水中啶虫脒的高效低耗技术。
- electro-peroxone /
- 臭氧 /
- 紫外光 /
- 啶虫脒
Abstract: The abatement kinetics and mechanism of acetamiprid were studied by ozonation, ultraviolet/ozone(UV/O₃), and electro-peroxone(EP) in the groundwater and surface water. The electrical energy demands per order removal(E_EO) of acetamiprid abatement by these processes were compared in two real water matrices. The second-order rate constants for the reaction of acetamiprid with ozone and hydroxyl radical(·OH) at pH of 7 were determined to be(0.05±0.01) mol/(L·s) and(2.8±0.2)×10⁹ mol/(L·s), respectively. After 6 min ozone oxidation, the removal rates of acetamiprid in groundwater and surface water were only 26% and 64%. In contrast, UV/O₃ and EP technology can completely remove acetamiprid from groundwater and surface water. The energy demands for 90% removal efficiency of acetamiprid were 0.11~0.27, 1.22~1.24, and 0.12~0.24 kW·h/m³ for ozonation, UV/O₃, and EP processes, respectively. The results showed that the EP process was an energy-efficient alternative for the abatement of acetamiprid in water treatment.
- electro-peroxone /
- ozone /
- ultraviolet /
- acetamiprid

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	MORRISSEY C A,MINEAU P,DEVRIES J H,et al.Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates:a review[J].Environment International,2015,74:291-303.
[2]	BARBOSA M O,MOREIRA N F,EIBEIRO A R,et al.Occurrence and removal of organic micropollutants:an overview of the watch list of EU Decision 2015/495[J].Water Research,2016,94:257-279.
[3]	SHI J L,ZHANG R N,PEI Y L,et al.Exposure to acetamiprid influences the development and survival ability of worker bees (Apis mellifera L.) from larvae to adults[J].Environmental Pollution,2020,266(Pt 2):115345.
[4]	LU Z T,LI M X,FANG Y L,et al.The mechanism of damage to the posterior silk gland by trace amounts of acetamiprid in the silkworm,Bombyx mori[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2020,170:104676.
[5]	KOCAMAN A Y,TOPAKTAS M.In vitro evaluation of the genotoxicity of acetamiprid in human peripheral blood lymphocytes[J].Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis,2007,48(6):483-490.
[6]	SADARIA A M,SUPOWIT S D,HALDEN R U.Mass balance assessment for six neonicotinoid insecticides during conventional wastewater and wetland treatment:nationwide reconnaissance in united states wastewater[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2016,50(12):6199-6206.
[7]	VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment:from basic principles to applications[M].2012,London:Iwa Publishing.,1-303.
[8]	WANG H J,ZHAN J H,GAO L W,et al.Kinetics and mechanism of thiamethoxam abatement by ozonation and ozone-based advanced oxidation processes[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,390:122180.
[9]	YUAN S,LI Z X,WANG Y J.Effective degradation of methylene blue by a novel electrochemically driven process[J].Electrochemistry Communications,2013,29:48-51.
[10]	YAO W K,WANG X F,YANG H W,et al.Removal of pharmaceuticals from secondary effluents by an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2016,88:826-835.
[11]	LI Y K,SHEN W H,FU S J,et al.Inhibition of bromate formation during drinking water treatment by adapting ozonation to electro-peroxone process[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,264:322-328.
[12]	LIN Z R,YAO W K,WANG Y,et al.Perchlorate formation during the electro-peroxone treatment of chloride-containing water:effects of operational parameters and control strategies[J]. Water Research,2016,88:691-702.
[13]	FIKIRDESICI-ERGEN S,AKSU P,ALTINDAG A.Effects of ozone treatment on the degradation and toxicity of several pesticides in different groups[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sci-Tarim Bili,2018,24(2):245-255.
[14]	CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H₂O₂ and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.
[15]	GONZALEZ T,DOMINGUEZ J R,CORREIA S.Neonicotinoids removal by associated binary,tertiary and quaternary advanced oxidation processes:synergistic effects,kinetics and mineralization[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:110156.
[16]	FASNABI P A,MADHU G,SOLOMAN P A.Removal of acetamiprid from wastewater by Fenton and Photo-Fenton processes-optimization by response surface methodology and kinetics[J].Clean-Soil,Air,Water,2016,44(6):728-737.
[17]	WANG Y J,LI X Y,ZHEN L M,et al.Electro-Fenton treatment of concentrates generated in nanofiltration of biologically pretreated landfill leachate[J].Journal of Hazard Mater,2012,229/230:115-121.
[18]	BADER H,HOIGNE J.Determination of ozone in water by the indigo method[J].Water Research,1981,15(4):449-456.
[19]	HUBER M M,CANONICA S,PARK G Y,et al.Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2003,37(5):1016-1024.
[20]	LEE Y,GERRITY D,LEE M,et al.Prediction of micropollutant elimination during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents:use of kinetic and water specific information[J].Environmental Science Technology,2013,47(11):5872-5881.
[21]	ROSENFELDT E J,LINDEN K G,CANONICA S,et al.Comparison of the efficiency of center dot OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O₃/H₂O₂ and UV/H₂O₂[J].Water Research,2006,40(20):3695-3704.
[22]	CRUZ-ALCALDE A,SANS C,ESPLUGAS S.Priority pesticides abatement by advanced water technologies:the case of acetamiprid removal by ozonation[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,599:1454-1461.
[23]	PPDB.Pesticide Properties DataBase[EB/OL].http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/index.htm,2012.
[24]	DELL’ARCIPRETE M L.Reactivity of hydroxyl radicals with neonicotinoid insecticides:mechanism and changes in toxicity[J].Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences,2009,8(7):1016-1023.
[25]	HAN W C,TIAN Y,SHEN X M.Human exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and the evaluation of their potential toxicity:an overview[J].Chemosphere,2018,192:59-65.
[26]	VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment.From Basic Principles to Applications[M].IWA Publishing,2012.
[27]	FRANGOS P,WANG H,SHEN W,et al.A novel photoelectro-peroxone process for the degradation and mineralization of substituted benzenes in water[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2016,286:239-248.
[28]	WANG H J,ZHAN J H,YAO W K,et al.Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation,peroxone (O₃/H₂O₂),and an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2018,130:127-138.
[29]	WANG Y X,ZHONG Z,MUHAMMAD Y,et al.Defect engineering of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) using different monodentate ligands for enhancement of photo-Fenton catalytic performance of acetamiprid degradation[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,398:125684.
[30]	CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H₂O₂ and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.