COMBUSTION BEHAVIOR OF PYROLYSIS CHAR PRODUCED FROM MSW COMPONENTS BASED ON ACTIVITY AND POLLUTANT EMISSION
-
摘要: 从燃烧活性和清洁性方面综合评价了6种生活垃圾典型可燃组分热解炭的燃烧性能。松木、纸张和橘皮等生物质类热解炭含较丰富的K/Ca等碱金属和碱土金属,碳结构规则程度相对较低,因此燃烧活性及稳定性更优。PVC、轮胎和织物等化石燃料类热解炭产率、孔隙结构、碳结构的差异较大,其中轮胎炭孔隙结构以中孔为主,且含有较多的S和Zn。生物质类热解炭焚烧烟气中NOx含量相对较高(140.7~385.5 mg/m3),轮胎炭焚烧烟气中的SO2(1889.8 mg/m3)和焚烧灰渣中重金属Zn(198167 mg/kg)浓度较高,在实际应用中应给予关注。Abstract: The pyrolysis char was produced from typical combustible components in MSW, and combustion behavior of which was evaluated based on both combustion activity and cleanliness. Biomass chars, prepared from raw materials such as pine wood, hardboard and orange peel chars, have relatively richer K/Ca content and less ordered carbon structure, leading to higher combustion activity and stability. The yields, texture structure and carbon structure of fossil fuel chars, such as PVC, tyre and chemical fiber fabrics chars, varied. Among which, the tyre char has a mesoporous structure and higher content of S and Zn. The NOx concentration in the flue gas from biomass char combustion was relatively higher(140.7~385.5 mg/m3), while SO2 concentration(1889.8 mg/m3) in the flue gas, and Zn content(198167 mg/kg) in the ash from tyre char combustion were relatively higher. Special attention should be paid on these pollutants in real practice.
-
Key words:
- municipal solid waste /
- combustible component /
- pyrolysis char /
- combustion activity /
- pollutants
-
[1] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.2019中国统计年鉴[R].北京:中国统计局,2019. [2] MANYÀ J J.Pyrolysis for biochar purposes:a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2012,46:7939-7954. [3] 邢文龙,张蒙蒙,朱赫男,等.城市生活垃圾与园林废物的热解实验[J].环境工程,2019,37(3):152-157,197. [4] 曹凤中,安祺,李京.生活垃圾热解气化技术的突破[J].黑龙江环境通报,2019,43(3):1-5,17. [5] 李琦,徐德龙,李辉,等.生活垃圾的热解试验[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,36(4):479-481. [6] 李文涛,柴宝华,王美净,等.不同生活垃圾组分热解炭化特性与热解焦傅里叶红外光谱表征[J].新能源进展,2020,8(1):22-27. [7] 赵凯峰.城市生活垃圾热解炭化工艺及炭化物特性研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009. [8] 俞河,殷操,郑雄柳,等.生活垃圾焚烧处置对环境的影响分析[J].资源节约与环保,2019(12):33. [9] 王艳.城市污泥及其与煤混烧的燃烧特性研究[D].长沙:长沙理工大学,2010. [10] LU K M,LEE W J,CHEN W H,et al.Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends[J].Applied Energy,2013,105:57-65. [11] OYEDUN A O,TEE C Z,HANSON S,et al.Thermogravimetric analysis of the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of plastics and biomass blends[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2014,128:471-481. [12] 杨殿才,潘宇涵,黄群星,等.废轮胎热解炭低温催化焦油重整制备富氢气体的研究[J].化工学报,2020,71:642-650. [13] SADEZKY A,MUCKENHUBER H,GROTHE H,et al.Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials:spectral analysis and structural information[J].Carbon,2005,43:1731-1742. [14] ISLAM MDA,AUTA M,KABIR G,et al.A thermogravimetric analysis of the combustion kinetics of karanja (Pongamia pinnata) fruit hulls char[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,200:335-341. [15] LAHIJANI P,ZAINAL Z A,MOHAMED A R,et al.CO2 gasification reactivity of biomass char:catalytic influence of alkali,alkaline earth and transition metal salts[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,144:288-295. [16] 钱晓峰,王肖杭,陆鹏,等.污泥、皮革和煤的协同热处置[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(12):6437-6442.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 245
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0