长沙市环境空气中BTEX的污染特征及健康风险

邹利林; 姚运先; 蒋利华; 王真真; 张洲

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202201015

长沙市环境空气中BTEX的污染特征及健康风险

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201015

1. 中国科学院广州地球化学研究所长沙矿产资源勘查中心, 长沙 410013;
2. 长沙环境保护职业技术学院湖南省挥发性有机物VOC监测技术工程中心, 长沙 410004

基金项目:

湖南省重点研发计划项目(2018SK2039)

湖南省自然科学基金项目(2019JJ50704)

湖南省环保科研课题(湘财建指[2017]83号)

中国科学院战略性科技先导专项(A类)(XDA23010303)

详细信息

作者简介:
邹利林(1988-),女,中级工程师,主要研究方向为VOCs监测分析。892426107@qq.com

通讯作者:
姚运先(1963-),男,教授,主要研究方向为环境监测技术。1104209520@qq.com

张洲(1988-),男,助理研究员,主要研究方向为大气挥发性有机物。zhouzhang@gig.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 89
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-03-18
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-30
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-30

POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISKS OF BTEX IN AMBIENT AIR OF CHANGSHA

1. Changsha Center for Mineral Resources Exploration, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410013, China;
2. Hunan Provincial Engineering Center of VOCs Monitoring Technology, Changsha Environmental Protection College, Changsha 410004, China

摘要

摘要: BTEX(苯、甲苯、乙苯、二甲苯等)是对空气质量和人体健康具有重要影响的挥发性有机物。为研究长沙市城市大气BTEX污染特征,选择2个典型城市站点(采样点S和W)于2017年8月进行了连续采样分析。结果显示:2个采样点BTEX平均浓度分别为(9.84±5.44),(6.35±4.68)μg/m³;其中间/对-二甲苯是占比最高的组分,分别为32.3%和26.7%,其次是甲苯,贡献比例分别为20.6%和22.8%。BTEX及主要组分浓度日变化呈“U形”特征,即7:00—8:00浓度较高,之后逐渐降低,至13:00—14:00出现最低值,然后上升,至16:00—17:00浓度高值,可能受光化学反应及排放强度等因素影响。由BTEX相关性及苯、甲苯、乙苯比值分析发现,长沙市城市大气BTEX主要受机动车排放、工业及溶剂排放等影响。BTEX非致癌风险危害商值(2.89×10^-4~9.35×10^-2)均<1,表明对暴露人群尚不存在明显的非致癌风险;但空气苯暴露的致癌风险评价值(6.41×10^-6,5.34×10^-6)却较高,表明苯可能对居民健康存在潜在的致癌风险。
- BTEX /
- 污染特征 /
- 来源 /
- 健康风险 /
- 长沙市
Abstract: BTEX(benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, etc) are volatile organic compounds which have great impact on air quality and human health. To study pollution characteristics of BTEX in Changsha, ambient samples were collected and analyzed consecutively at two typical urban sites(site S and W) during August 2017. The results showed that the averaged concentrations of BTEX were(9.84±5.44) μg/m³ at site S and(6.35±4.68) μg/m³ at site W, respectively; and m, p-xylenes were the most abundant species among BTEX with contributions of 32.3% and 26.7%, respectively, followed by toluene with contributions of 20.6% and 22.8%, respectively. Diurnal variations of major BTEX species showed a “U” pattern with lower concentrations during 13:00—14:00 and higher concentrations during 7:00—8:00 and 16:00—17:00, which might be influenced by variation of photo-chemistry reactivity and source emission. The correlations among BTEX and relative proportions of benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene suggested that traffic-relate sources, industrial sources and solvent emissions were the major sources of ambient BTEX in Changsha. The non-carcinogenic hazard quotients of BTEX(2.89×10^-4~9.35×10^-2) were all lower than 1, indicating no obvious adverse carcinogenic hazard risk on the exposed population. However, the carcinogenic hazard risk values of benzene(6.41×10^-6and 5.34×10^-6) were higher, implying the potential cancer risks due to ambient benzene exposure in the study region.
- BTEX /
- pollution characteristics /
- sources /
- health risk /
- Changsha

HTML全文

参考文献(46)

[1]	LYU X P,GUO H,WANG F,et al.Hazardous volatile organic compounds in ambient air of China[J].Chemosphere,2020,246:125731.
[2]	ZHANG X M,XUE Z G,LI H,et al.Ambient volatile organic compounds pollution in China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2017,55:69-75.
[3]	FISHBEIN L.An overview of environmental and toxicological aspects of aromatic hydrocarbons.Ⅰ.Benzene[J].Science of the Total Environment,1984,40 (1):189-218.
[4]	KHAN H.Short review:benzene’s toxicity:a consolidated short review of human and animal studies[J].Human & Experimental Toxicology,2007,26 (9):677-685.
[5]	World Health Organization (WHO).International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).Some industrial chemicals and dye stuffs.vol 29[R].WHO Regional Publication,European Series World Health Organization,Regional Office for Europe,Copenhagen,1999.
[6]	United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).Toxicological review of benzene (non-cancer effects) (EPA/635/R-02/001F)[R].United States Environmental Protection Agency,Washington,DC,2002.
[7]	European Union (EU).Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe[S].2008.
[8]	夏芬美,李红,李金娟,等.北京市东北城区夏季环境空气中苯系物的污染特征与健康风险评价[J].生态毒理学报,2014,9 (6):1041-1052.
[9]	CARTER W P L.Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds[J].Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,1994,44 (7):881-899.
[10]	FORSTNER H J L,FLAGAN R C,SEINFELD J H.Secondary organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons:molecular composition[J].Environmental Science & Technology,1997,31 (5):1345-1358.
[11]	SATO K,TAKAMI A,ISOZAKI T,et al.Mass spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosol formed from the photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons[J].Atmospheric Environment,2010,44(8):1080-1087.
[12]	ZENG L W,FAN G J,LYU X P,et al.Atmospheric fate of peroxyacetyl nitrate in suburban Hong Kong and its impact on local ozone pollution[J].Environmental Pollution,2019,252 (Part B):1910-1919.
[13]	WANG B,SHAO M,LU S H,et al.Variation of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Beijing city in summer 2008[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2010,10 (13):5911-5923.
[14]	ZOU Y,DENG X J,ZHU D,et al.Characteristics of 1 year of observational data of VOCs,NO_x and O₃ at a suburban site in Guangzhou,China[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2015,15 (12):6625-6636.
[15]	王倩,陈长虹,王红丽,等.上海市秋季大气VOCs对二次有机气溶胶的生成贡献及来源研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(2):424-433.
[16]	DING X,WANG X M,GAO B,et al.Tracer-based estimation of secondary organic carbon in the Pearl River Delta,south China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2012,117 (D5):D05313.
[17]	WANG S,WU D,WANG X M,et al.Relative contributions of secondary organic aerosol formation from toluene,xylenes,isoprene,and monoterpenes in Hong Kong and Guangzhou in the Pearl River Delta,China:an emission-based box modeling study[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2013,118(2):507-519.
[18]	国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2019[M].中国统计出版社,2019.
[19]	CHAN L Y,CHU K W,ZOU S C,et al.Characteristics of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) in industrial,industrial-urban,and industrial-suburban atmospheres of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of south China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2006,111 (D11):D11304.
[20]	LIU Y,SHAO M,FU L L,et al.Source profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China:Part Ⅰ[J].Atmospheric Environment,2008,42 (25):6247-6260.
[21]	TSAI S M,ZHANG J F,SMITH K R,et al.Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons emitted from various cookstoves Used in China[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2003,37 (13):2869-2877.
[22]	LI M,ZHANG Q,STREETS D G,et al.Mapping Asian anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds to multiple chemical mechanisms[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2014,14 (11):5617-5638.
[23]	HAN T T,MA Z Q,XU W Y,et al.Characteristics and source implications of aromatic hydrocarbons at urban and background areas in Beijing,China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,707:136083.
[24]	杨婷,李丹丹,单玄龙,等.北京市典型城区环境空气中苯系物的污染特征、来源分析与健康风险评价[J].生态毒理学报,2017,12 (5):79-97.
[25]	LIU Y H,WANG H L,JING S G,et al.Characteristics and sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Shanghai during summer:implications of regional transport[J].Atmospheric Environment,2019,215:116902.
[26]	李雷,李红,王学中,等.广州市中心城区环境空气中挥发性有机物的污染特征与健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2013,34(12):4558-4564.
[27]	虞小芳,程鹏,古颖纲,等.广州市夏季VOCs对臭氧及SOA生成潜势的研究[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(3):830-837.
[28]	WEI W,WANG S X,HAO J M,et al.Trends of chemical speciation profiles of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds emissions in China,2005—2020[J].Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering,2014,8:27-41.
[29]	HUI L R,LIU X G,TAN Q W,et al.VOC characteristics,chemical reactivity and sources in urban Wuhan,central China[J].Atmospheric Environment,2020,224:117340.
[30]	司雷霆,王浩,李洋,等.太原市夏季大气VOCs污染特征及臭氧生成潜势[J].中国环境科学,2019,39 (9):3655-3662.
[31]	徐晨曦,陈军辉,韩丽,等.成都市2017年夏季大气VOCs污染特征、臭氧生成潜势及来源分析[J].环境科学研究,2019,32 (4):619-626.
[32]	刘芮伶,翟崇治,李礼,等.重庆主城区夏秋季挥发性有机物(VOCs)浓度特征及来源研究[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(4):1260-1267.
[33]	ZHANG Z,ZHANG Y L,WANG X M,et al.Spatiotemporal patterns and source implications of aromatic hydrocarbons at six rural sites across China’s developed coastal regions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2016,121 (11):6669-6687.
[34]	侯捷,曲艳慧,宁大亮,等.我国居民暴露参数特征及其对风险评估的影响[J].环境科学与技术,2014,37 (8):179-187.
[35]	HUANG Z H,ZHANG Y L,YAN Q,et al.Decreased human respiratory absorption factors of aromatic hydrocarbons at lower exposure levels:the dual effect in reducing ambient air toxics[J].Environmental Science & Technology Letters,2017,4:463-469.
[36]	尤翔宇,罗达通,刘湛,等.长株潭城市群人为源VOCs排放清单及其对环境的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(2):461-468.
[37]	ZHANG J G,WANGY S,WU F K,et al.Non-methane hydrocarbon measurements at a suburban site in Changsha,China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2009,408 (2):312-317.
[38]	黄海梅,戴春皓,王章玮,等.长沙市大气挥发性有机物的组成与来源[J].环境化学,2019,38 (3):539-547.
[39]	ZHENG H,KONG S F,XING X L,et al.Monitoring of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from an oil and gas station in northwest China for 1 year[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2018,18(7):4567-4595.
[40]	ZHANG Y L,WANG X M,BARLETTA B,et al.Source attributions of hazardous aromatic hydrocarbons in urban,suburban and rural areas in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2013,250/251:403-411.
[41]	WANG X M,SHENG G Y,FU J M,et al.Urban roadside aromatic hydrocarbons in three cities of the Pearl River Delta,People’s Republic of China[J].Atmospheric Environment,2002,36 (33):5141-5148.
[42]	United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume Ⅰ:human health evaluation manual (Part F,supplemental guidance for inhalation risk assessment):Final [EPA Report].(EPA/540/-R-070/002)[R].http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsf/index.htm.2009.
[43]	南淑清,张霖琳,张丹,等.郑州市环境空气中VOCs的污染特征及健康风险评价[J].生态环境学报,2014,23 (9):1438-1444.
[44]	李友平,唐娅,范忠雨,等.成都市大气环境VOCs污染特征及其健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2018,39 (2):576-584.
[45]	张平.杭州市空气中苯系物的污染特征、来源及健康风险[D].杭州:浙江大学,2007.
[46]	管贤贤,齐安安,雷春妮,等.兰州市大气苯系物的化学活性特征与健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2020,40 (2):459-468.