湖北某铅锌矿区农用地重金属调查与类别划分

张耀; 孙刚; 王琪; 凌海波; 胡楠

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202202022

湖北某铅锌矿区农用地重金属调查与类别划分

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202022

湖北省生态环境科学研究院(省生态环境工程评估中心) 国家环境保护土壤健康诊断与绿色修复重点实验室, 武汉 430072

基金项目:

湖北省环境科学研究院青年人才创新基金项目(2019-18)

详细信息

作者简介:
张耀(1989-),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事土壤污染调查与风险评估研究。zy4726654@163.com

通讯作者:
孙刚(1986-),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事土壤污染调查与风险评估研究。491508302@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 241
- HTML全文浏览量: 48
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-05
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-02
- 刊出日期: 2022-04-02

INVESTIGATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF HEAVY METALS IN AGRICULTURAL LAND IN A LEAD-ZINC MINING AREA IN HUBEI PROVINCE

State Key Laboratory of Soil Health Diagnosis and Green Remediation for Environmental Protection, Provincial Ecology & Environment Engineering Evaluation Center, Hubei Academy of Environmental Science, Wuhan 430072, China

摘要

摘要: 以鄂东南某铅锌矿区147.3 hm²农用地土壤为研究对象,通过现场采样及实验室测试,对土壤重金属Cu、Cr、Ni、Zn、Pb、Cd、As和Hg含量进行分析和评价。结果表明:Cu、Zn、Pb、Cd和As的点位超标率分别为33.7%、49.0%、73.5%、95.9%和85.7%,单因子污染指数顺序为Cd>As>Pb>Zn>Cu;通过内梅罗综合污染指数评价,重度污染、中度污染、轻微污染的点位比例分别为59.18%、12.24%、27.55%;通过土壤和农产品综合质量指数法评价,矿区农用地土壤大部分呈重度污染状态(土壤综合质量影响指数IICQ_S>5),与Pb、Cd和As含量高值并集区域分布一致;而农产品大部分属于清洁或轻微污染状态(农产品综合质量影响指数IICQ_AP<2),超标点位分布无明显规律;IICQ_S值与IICQ_AP值无显著相关性;IICQ值与IICQ_S值的分布相一致,研究区内农用地IICQ均值为7.84,属于重度污染。结合现场调查及数据分析,对矿区农用地土壤污染概念模型提出了初步构想。根据《农用地土壤环境质量类别划分技术指南(试行)》,结合农产品调查结果,将矿区农用地中的耕地划分为优先保护Ⅱ类(21.4 hm²)、安全利用Ⅰ类(57.8 hm²)、安全利用类荒地(29 hm²)、安全利用Ⅱ类(1.2 hm²)、严格管控类(37.9 hm²)。
- 矿区 /
- 农用地 /
- 土壤 /
- 农产品 /
- 重金属污染 /
- 污染源 /
- 土壤分类
Abstract: The soil of 147.3 hm² agricultural land in a lead-zinc mining area in Southeast Hubei Province was studied, through field sampling and laboratory test. The contents of heavy metals Cu, Cr, Ni, Zn, Pb, Cd, As and Hg in soil were evaluated. The results showed that: The over-standard rates of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and As were 33.7%, 49.0%, 73.5%, 95.9% and 85.7%, respectively. The order of single factor pollution index was Cd>As>Pb>Zn>Cu; through the Nemerow Comprehensive Pollution Index evaluation, the proportion of severe pollution, moderate pollution and slight pollution was 59.18%, 12.24% and 27.55%, respectively. Through the comprehensive index combined soil environmental quality and agricultural products quality, most of the soil of agricultural land in the lead-zinc mining area was heavily polluted(IICQ_S>5), which was consistent with the regional distribution of Pb, Cd and As. However, most of the agricultural products were clean or slightly polluted(IICQ_AP<2), and there was no obvious law in distribution of the over-standard points. There was no significant correlation between IICQs and IICQap. The distribution of IICQ value and IICQs value was consistent. Average IICQ of agricultural land in the study area was 7.84, which was heavily polluted. Combined with field investigation and data analysis, the conceptual model of soil pollution in the lead-zinc mining area was preliminarily conceived. According to Technical Guide for the Classification of Soil Environmental Quality of Agricultural Land, combined with the survey result on agricultural products, the cultivated land in the agricultural land in the lead-zinc mining area was divided into priority protection type Ⅱ(21.4 hm²), safe use type Ⅰ(57.8 hm²), safe use type wasteland(29 hm²), safe use type Ⅱ(1.2 hm²) and strict control type(37.9 hm²).
- mining area /
- agricultural land /
- soil /
- agricultural products /
- heavy metal pollution /
- pollution source /
- soil classification

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

[1]	PRUVOT C,DOUAY F,HERVE F,et al.Heavy metals in soil,crops and grass as a source of human exposure in the former mining areas[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2006,6(4):215-220.
[2]	KUMAR V,SHARMA A,KAUR P,et al.Pollution assessment of heavy metals in soils of India and ecological risk assessment:a state-of-the-art[J].Chemosphere,2019,216:449-462.
[3]	刘春跃,王辉,白明月,等.沈阳市老城区表层土壤重金属分布特征及风险评价[J].环境工程,2020,38(1):167-171.
[4]	SOUMIA R,AMINA A,KAMAL B,et al.Assessment of heavy metal pollution and ecological risk of roadside soils in tlemcen (Algeria) using flame-atomic absorption spectrometry[J].Analytical Letters,2018,51(15):1-20.
[5]	AJIGUL M,MAMATTURSUN E,ANWAR M,et al.The spatial distribution,contamination,and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals of farmland soils in Karashahar-Baghrash oasis,northwest China[J].Taylor & Francis,2017,23(5/6):1300-1314.
[6]	CHRISTOPHER I E,CYNTHIA E O,JOY O N.Application of multiple ecological risk indices for the assessment of heavy metal pollution in soils in major mechanic villages in abuja,nigeria[J].Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology,2017.
[7]	陈涛,常庆瑞,刘京,等.长期污灌农田土壤重金属污染及潜在环境风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(11):2152-2159.
[8]	刘春早,黄益宗,雷鸣,等.湘江流域土壤重金属污染及其生态环境风险评价[J].环境科学,2012,33(1):260-265.
[9]	赵秀峰,王强盛,石宁宁,等.石化园区周边农田土壤重金属污染分析与评价[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(1):133-141.
[10]	杨敏,滕应,任文杰,等.石门雄黄矿周边农田土壤重金属污染及健康风险评估[J].土壤,2016,48(6):1172-1178.
[11]	常青山,马祥庆,王志勇.南方重金属矿区重金属的污染特征及评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007(3):395-399.
[12]	李娟娟,马金涛,楚秀娟,等.应用地积累指数法和富集因子法对铜矿区土壤重金属污染的安全评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(12):135-139 ,170.
[13]	王华东,朱耀明,曾连茂,等.黄石大冶地区土壤重金属的背景值研究[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),1982(1):96-109.
[14]	徐晓慧,高宗军,庞绪贵,等.山东寿光地区蔬菜重金属赋存现状研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(28):15830-15831.
[15]	郑路,常江.合肥市菜园蔬菜和土壤的铅污染调查[J].环境污染与防治,1989(5):33-37.
[16]	王辉,王宜娟,黎星辉,等.洛阳市蔬菜基地土壤重金属含量对蔬菜安全性的影响[J].食品科学,2010,31(21):369-372.
[17]	彭启志.蔬菜中重金属铅镉含量与健康风险分析[J].食品与生物技术学报,2014,33(10):1116-1119.
[18]	蔡美芳,党志,文震,等.矿区周围土壤中重金属危害性评估研究[J].生态环境,2004,13(1):6-8.
[19]	JOHNSON D B,HALLBERG K B.Acid mine drainage remediation options:a review[J].Science of the Total Environment,2005,338(1):3-14.
[20]	王玉军,刘存,周东美,等.一种农田土壤重金属影响评价的新方法:土壤和农产品综合质量指数法[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(7):1225-1232.
[21]	农业环境背景协作组.我国十三省(市)主要农业土壤及粮食作物中有害元素环境背景值研究[J].农业环境科学学报,1986,5(3):1-11.
[22]	DONG B,ZHANG R Z,GAN Y D,et al.Multiple methods for the identification of heavy metal sources in cropland soils from a resource-based region[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,651(Pt 2):3127-3138.
[23]	陶澍,曹军,李本纲,等.深圳市土壤微量元素含量成因分析[J].土壤学报,2001,38(2):248-255.
[24]	周启星,任丽萍,孙铁珩,等.某铅锌矿开采区土壤镉的污染及有关界面过程[J].土壤通报,2002,33(4):300-302.