中试尺度下连续式可渗透反应墙修复Cr（Ⅵ）污染地下水效果评估

李敬杰; 蔡五田; 吕永高; 边超; 杨骊; 王明国

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202202025

中试尺度下连续式可渗透反应墙修复Cr（Ⅵ）污染地下水效果评估

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202025

中国地质调查局水文地质环境地质调查中心, 河北保定 071051

基金项目:

豫北山前冲洪积扇含水层水质调查(DD20160310)

科技基础资源调查专项(2017FY100401)

水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2018ZX07109-001-02)

详细信息

作者简介:
李敬杰(1985-),女,硕士,工程师,研究方向为地下水与土壤污染调查评价研究。576095370@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 207
- HTML全文浏览量: 24
- PDF下载量: 14
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-21
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-02
- 刊出日期: 2022-04-02

EFFECT EVALUATION OF Cr（Ⅵ） CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION BY PERMEABLE REACTIVE WALL IN PILOT SCALE

Center for Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology,China Geological Survey, Baoding 071051, China

摘要

摘要: 以Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水场地为例,基于室内模拟实验确定的PRB墙体尺寸及反应介质,建设了国内首座连续式PRB装置,自墙体建成后运行10个月内,对墙体内外监测井水位、水环境指标进行了4次监测。结果表明:PRB墙体内地下水流速>周边含水层中地下水流速,地下水流向虽局部有所改变,但总体上仍垂直穿过PRB墙体,未出现绕流现象;连续4期监测数据显示墙体内部均无Cr(Ⅵ)检出,受丰水期影响第4期墙体上下游C(Ⅵ)浓度明显高于其他期;墙体上、下游地下水pH在6.5~8.5,符合GB 5749—2006《生活饮用水卫生标准》,由于墙体内部铁的腐蚀作用pH快速增大,pH值在9~10.5,明显高于墙体上、下游;墙体内部发生强烈的氧化还原反应,连续3期监测的ORP值均为负值(-260~-140 mV),处于强还原性环境;墙体内Fe(Ⅱ)浓度高于墙体外,分布不均匀,其中G3-2井处浓度最高为3.52 mg/L;墙体内Cr(Ⅵ)的去除与Ca²⁺、Mg²⁺、HCO₃^-、SO₄^2-的去除同时进行,Mg²⁺和SO₄^2-是Cr(Ⅵ)去除的主要影响因素。综上,中试尺度下可渗透反应墙修复 Cr( Ⅵ ) 污染地下水案例中,在运行 10 个月监测周期内墙体内处于强还原、碱性环境,反应材料活性高,Cr( Ⅵ )修复效果明显。
- 可渗透反应墙 /
- Cr(Ⅵ)污染 /
- 原位修复 /
- 地下水
Abstract: In this paper, taking Cr(Ⅵ) contaminated groundwater site as an example, based on the size and reaction medium of PRB wall determined by indoor simulation experiment, the water level and water environment indexes of the monitoring well inside and outside the wall were monitored for four times in 10 months after the completion of the PRB wall. The results showed that the groundwater velocity in the PRB wall was greater than that in the surrounding aquifer. Although the groundwater flow direction changed locally, it still passed through the PRB wall vertically and no flow around was found. The monitoring data of four consecutive periods showed that no Cr(Ⅵ) was detected inside the wall, affected by the wet season, and the concentration of Cr(Ⅵ) in the upper and lower reaches of the wall in the fourth period was significantly higher than that in other periods. The pH value of groundwater in the upstream and downstream of the wall was between 6.5 and 8.5, meeting the requirements of China's national drinking water standard. Due to the corrosion of iron in the wall, the pH value increased rapidly and ranged in 9~10.5, which was significantly higher than that in the upstream and downstream of the wall. There was a strong oxidation-reduction reaction in the wall, and the ORP values monitored in three consecutive periods were negative(-260~-140 mV), indicating a strong reducing environment. Fe(Ⅱ) concentration in the wall was higher than that outside the wall, its distribution was uneven, and the concentration in Well G3-2 was the highest, with a value of 3.52 mg/L; the removal of Cr(Ⅵ) in the wall was carried out simultaneously with the removal of Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, HCO₃^- and SO₄^-, and Mg²⁺ and SO₄^- were the main influencing factors of Cr(Ⅵ) removal. To sum up, in the case of remediation of Cr(Ⅵ) contaminated groundwater by permeable reaction wall at pilot scale, the wall was in a strong reducing and alkaline environment during the monitoring period of 10 months, the reactive material was highly active, and the remediation effect of hexavalent chromium was obvious.
- permeable reactive barrier /
- Cr(Ⅵ) contamination /
- in-situ remediation /
- groundwater

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	ALTUNDOGAN H S.Cr (Ⅵ) removal from aqueous solution by Fe(Ⅲ) hydroxide-loaded sugar beet pulp[J].Process Biochemistry,2005,40(3/4):1443-1452.
[2]	KHAN M N,WAHAB M F.Characterization of chemically modified corncobs and its application in the removal of metal ions from aqueous solution[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2006,141:237-244.
[3]	FEI W,WANG Q X,ZHAO C X,et al.CTMAB-modified bentonite-Based PRB in remediating Cr(Ⅵ) contaminated groundwater[J].Water Air Soil Pollut,2020,231:20.
[4]	徐慧,仵彦卿.六价铬在具有渗透性反应墙的渗流槽中迁移实验研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(8):1941-1946.
[5]	吕永高,蔡五田,杨骊,等.中试尺度下可渗透反应墙位置优化模拟:以铬污染地下水场地为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(5):189-195.
[6]	祁宝川,韩志勇,陈吉祥.PRB修复重金属污染地下水的反应介质研究进展[J].应用化工,2017,46(4):749-754.
[7]	潘煜,孙力平,陈星宇,等.CMC改性纳米Fe/Cu双金属模拟PRB去除地下水中2,4-二氯苯酚[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(9):3789-3796.
[8]	贾汉忠,宋存义,李晖.纳米零价铁处理地下水污染技术研究进展[J].化工进展,2009,28(11):2028-2034.
[9]	GUERIN T F,HORNER S,MCGOVERN T,et al.An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater[J].Water Research,2002,36(1):15-24.
[10]	LUDWIG R D,MCGREGOR R G,BLOWS D W.A permeable reactive barrier for treatment of heavy metals[J].Ground Water,2002,40(1):59-66.
[11]	石巍巍,王丹一,张春伟.地下水重金属污染中PRB修复技术的运用[J].环境与发展,2018,30(4):123-125.
[12]	BLOWES D W,PTACEK C J,BENNER S G,et al.Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,45(1/2):123-137.
[13]	CUNDY A B,HOPKINSON L,WHITBYR L D.Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation:a review[J].Science of the Total Environment,2008,400(1/2/3):42-51.
[14]	李梅,严锐钊,洪家兴,等.PRB技术同步去除地下水中硝酸盐和镉[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(4):894-901.
[15]	王泓泉.污染地下水可渗透反应墙(PRB)技术研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2020,10(2):251-259.
[16]	田雷.复合介质 PRB 去除地下水中氯代烃和苯系物混合污染研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.
[17]	腾应,陈梦舫.稀土尾矿库区地下水污染风险评估与防控修复技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[18]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所宋昕团队.原长沙铬盐厂可渗透反应墙(PRB)原位修复铬污染地下水[EB/OL].(2019-04-04)[2019-07-14].http:www.rem-tech.cn/news/html/ 526.html.
[19]	黄园英,刘菲,鲁雅梅.零价铁去除 Cr(Ⅵ)的批实验研究[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2003,22(4):349-351.
[20]	李敬杰,蔡五田,张涛,等.铸铁和椰壳活性炭混合介质修复高浓度Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水研究[J].环境污染与防治,2019,41(5):551-555.
[21]	LI Y C.Chromate reduction in wastewater at different pH levels using thin iron wires-a laboratory study[J].Environmental Progress,2005,24(3):305-316.
[22]	李雅,张增强,唐次来,等.Fe⁰去除地下水中六价铬的研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2011,16(2):160-164.
[23]	周启星,林海芳.污染土壤及地下水修复的PRB技术及展望[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2001,2(5):48-53.
[24]	USEPA.An in situ permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of hexavalent chromium and trichloroethylene in ground water:volume 1 design and installation[R].Washington,D C:USEP,1999.
[25]	HUANG D D,WANG G C,LI Z H,etal.Investigation of the removal mechanism of Cr(Ⅵ) in groundwater using activated carbon and cast iron combined system[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24:18341-18354.