基于水质超标率改进算法的巢湖引水方案优化

逄敏; 汪静娴; 胥瑞晨

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202203012

基于水质超标率改进算法的巢湖引水方案优化

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203012

逄敏¹,
汪静娴^1,2, ,,
胥瑞晨²

1. 南方科技大学环境科学与工程学院, 广东深圳 518055;
2. 河海大学环境学院, 南京 210024

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52000100)

国家科技重大专项(2018ZX07208-005)

详细信息

作者简介:
逄敏(1988-),女,博士,主要研究方向为水资源管理与模型调控工作。mia_pang@sina.com

通讯作者:
汪静娴(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水环境数学模拟。310413590@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 139
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-12-06
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-07

OPTIMIZATION OF WATER DIVERSION SCHEME OF CHAO LAKE BY IMPROVED WATER QUALITY OVER-STANDARD RATE ALGORITHM

1. College of Environment Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
2. College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China

摘要

摘要: 巢湖作为引江济淮工程的调蓄场所,从流域整体考虑,对巢湖引水方案进行优化具有重要意义。基于近10年巢湖地区实测水文、水质和气象资料,借助二维非稳态水环境模型对外部影响因素组合方案进行模拟,并对模拟结果进行不确定性分析、K-mediods聚类和SRRC敏感性分析,得到各外部影响因素定性和定量的权重,白石天河口NH₄⁺-N外部影响因素影响权重的排序为引水水质(56%)>引水流量(26%)>风速(18%),TP为引水水质(57%)>风速(29%)>引水流量(14%);杭埠河口NH₄⁺-N权重排序为风速(71%)>引水流量(16%)>引水水质(13%),TP为风速(73%)>引水水质(18%)>引水流量(9%)。根据外部影响因素权重改进超标率算法,白石天河口门(11.6%)引水水质超标率远低于杭埠河口门(28.4%)引水,白石天河口为最佳引水方案,为大型浅水湖泊引调水方案的比选提供参考。
- 引调水工程 /
- 不确定性分析 /
- 敏感性分析 /
- 外部影响因素 /
- 水质超标率
Abstract: Chao Lake is a storage site for the diversion project from the Yangtze River to the Huai River, it is of great significance to optimize the selection of water diversion schemes starting from the whole basin. The paper based on nearly 10 years measured data of hydrology, water quality and meteorology in Chao Lake area with the usage of two-dimensional unsteady water environment model to simulate the combination of external influencing factors. Uncertainty analysis, K-mediods clustering analysis, and SRRC sensitivity analysis were performed on the simulation results to obtain the external influencing factors' qualitative and quantitative weights. The weights of the external influencing factors of ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus in the Baishitian River Estuary were ranked as diversion water quality (56%)>diversion flow (26%)>wind speed (18%), diversion water quality (57%)>wind speed (29%)>diversion flow (14%); the weights of ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus in the Hangbu River Estuary were ranked as wind speed (71%)>diversion flow (16%)>Diversion water quality (13%), and wind speed (73%)>diversion water quality (18%)>diversion flow (9%), respectively. Based on the weights of external factors, the over-standard rate algorithm was improved. The over-standard rate of water diversion at Baishitian River Estuary (11.6%) was much lower than that of Hangbu River Estuary (28.4%), and the Baishitian River Estuary was selected as the best diversion scheme. That provided a certain reference value for the comparison and selection of water diversion schemes for large shallow lakes.
- water diversion project /
- uncertainty analysis /
- sensitivity analysis /
- external influence factors /
- water quality exceeding rate

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	孙康茜,刘花台,曹文志,等.引江济淮工程对派河水环境的影响[J].环境工程,2019,37(12):49-54.
[2]	ZHANG X S, WANG T T, GAO L, et al. Polychlorinated diphenyl ethers (PCDEs) in surface sediments, suspended particulate matter (SPM) and surface water of Chaohu Lake, China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 241(10):441-450.
[3]	FENG T, WANG C, HOU J, et al. Effect of inter-basin water transfer on water quality in an urban lake:a combined water quality index algorithm and biophysical modelling approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 92(9):61-71.
[4]	WU Z S, WANG X L, CHEN Y W, et al. Assessing river water quality using water quality index in Lake Taihu Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 612:914-922.
[5]	DJAJA I, PURWANTO P, SUNOKO H R, et al. Evaluation of water quality at river bian in merauke papua[J]. E3s Web of Conferences, 2018, 31:08006.
[6]	LIANG Z Y, ZHANG Y Y, QIAN S, et al. A statistical method with water quality compliance assessment based on binomial test[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(1):339-346.
[7]	张祺,景朝霞,刘燚,等.针对正态样本的模糊综合评价法在巢湖水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2015,33(3):110-112 ,135.
[8]	王艳平,徐伟伟,韩超,等.巢湖沉积物氮磷分布及污染评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(2):699-711.
[9]	朱金杰,邹楠,钟寰,等.富营养化巢湖沉积物溶解性有机质光谱时空分布特征及其环境意义[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(7):2528-2538.
[10]	李一平,邱利,唐春燕,等.湖泊水动力模型外部输入条件不确定性和敏感性分析[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(2):410-416.
[11]	王全民,杨晶,张帅帅.一种基于改进果蝇优化的K-mediods聚类算法[J].计算机技术与发展,2018,28(12):17-22.
[12]	程月,李一平,施媛媛,等.大型浅水湖泊沉积成岩模型不确定性与敏感性分析:以氮为例[J].湖泊科学,2020,32(6):1646-1656.
[13]	于洋,彭福利,孙聪,等.典型湖泊水华特征及相关影响因素分析[J].中国环境监测,2017,33(2):88-94.
[14]	高月香,张毅敏,张永春.流速对太湖底泥污染物释放的影响[J].环境工程,2014,32(8):10-14.
[15]	胥瑞晨,逄勇,胡祉冰,等.太湖水龄与水力停留时间关系及参数敏感性[J].水资源保护,2020,36(3):34-39.
[16]	AMANO Y, SAKAI Y, SEKIYA T, et al. Effect of phosphorus fluctuation caused by river water dilution in eutrophic lake on competition between blue-green alga Microcystis aeruginosa and diatom Cyclotella sp.[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 22(11):1666-1673.
[17]	LI Y P, TANG C Y, WANG C, et al. Improved Yangtze River Diversions:are they helping to solve algal bloom problems in Lake Taihu, China?[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 51:104-116.
[18]	LIU H F, ZHU Z X, LIU J J, et al. Numerical analysis of the impact factors on the flow fields in a large shallow lake[J]. Water, 2019, 11(1):155.
[19]	WEIWEI S, QING X, XINGQIAN F, et al. Research on the relationship between water diversion and water quality of Xuanwu Lake, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research&Public Health, 2018, 15(6):1262-.
[20]	LIU Y, WANG Y L, SHENG H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of lake eutrophication responses under alternative water diversion scenarios:a water quality modeling based statistical analysis approach[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 468/469(1):219-227.
[21]	周艳蕾,张传松,石晓勇,等.黄渤海海水中叶绿素a的分布特征及其环境影响因素[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(11):4259-4265.
[22]	柯岚兰,党凤花.巢湖蓝藻期间水质状况分析[J].资源节约与环保,2019(2):17,19.
[23]	谭茜.环巢湖支流污染结构及治理方向[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(17):77-82.
[24]	张伊佳,陈星,许钦,等.太湖下游河网区水质变化特征与引水调控效果[J].水资源保护,2020,36(5):79-86.
[25]	杨显.望虞河引水工程对贡湖湾水质及主要取水口总磷的影响[J].净水技术,2020,39(5):80-85.