建筑室内健康环境中不同过滤单元净化PM<sub>2.5</sub>特性

郭二宝; 张一飞; 胡浩威; 王含笑; 刘兴成

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202204010

建筑室内健康环境中不同过滤单元净化PM_2.5特性

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204010

郭二宝^1,2, ,,
张一飞^1,2,
胡浩威^1,2,
王含笑³,
刘兴成⁴

1. 安徽建筑大学安徽省绿色建筑先进技术研究院, 合肥 230601;
2. 安徽建筑大学建筑室内热湿环境实验室, 合肥 230601;
3. 安徽宾肯电气股份有限公司, 合肥 230088;
4. 中冶赛迪上海工程技术有限公司, 上海 200940

基金项目:

安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2020A0465)

上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划(21YF1460000)

安徽建筑大学引进人才及博士启动基金项目(2018QD44)

安徽省绿色建筑先进技术研究院开放课题(AHLJY-2020-02)

详细信息

通讯作者:
郭二宝(1980-),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为环境空气污染控制。263760999@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 96
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-21
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-06

PM_2.5 PURIFICATION CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT FILTER UNITS IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENT OF THE BUIDINGS

1. Advanced Technology Institute of Green Building Research of Anhui Province, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Indoor Thermal and Humid Environment, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China;
3. Anhui Beacon Electric Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China;
4. CISDI Shanghai Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200940, China

摘要

摘要: 针对后疫情时代下建筑室内净化问题,选取6种过滤单元(1号—G4夹碳布,2号—G4涤纶,3号—F7玻纤,4号—F7静电熔喷布,5号—G4涤纶+F7玻纤,6号—微静电荷电模块+G4涤纶),试验探究其PM_2.5净化性能。试验测试了不同过滤单元的一次过滤效率、PM_2.5净化效率、阻力、洁净空气量(CADR)与净化能效 (CEE)。结果表明:1)5号和6号的组合过滤单元可有效提高一次过滤效率和PM_2.5净化效率。2)额定风速下,2号过滤单元阻力最小,5号过滤单元的阻力最大。3)在最大风量工况下,4号过滤单元的CADR和CEE最大,2号过滤单元的CADR和CEE最小,分别约为4号过滤单元的7.13%与6.54%。6号过滤单元相比2号过滤单元的CADR和CEE分别提升约150%与247%,表明微静电荷电模块在不增加过滤单元阻力的情况下,能够提高一次过滤效率和PM_2.5净化效率,有效缩短相同工况下的净化时间。
- 过滤单元 /
- PM_2.5 /
- CADR /
- CEE /
- 空气净化器
Abstract: In response to the requirements of building indoor purification in the post-COVID-19 era, six kinds of different filter units were selected (No.1—G4 carbon cloth, No.2—G4 polyester, No.3—F7 glass fiber, No.4—F7 electrostatic melt blown cloth, No.5—G4 polyester+F7 glass fiber, No.6-micro static charge electric module+G4 Polyester), and the PM_2.5 purification performance of different filter units were analysed through experiments. The primary filtration efficiency, PM_2.5 purification efficiency, resistance, CADR and CEE of the different filter units were tested. The results showed that: 1) No.5 and No.6 composed filter unit could effectively improve the primary filtration efficiency of the filter unit and PM_2.5 purification efficiency. 2) At the rated wind speed, the resistance of the No.2 filter unit was the lowest, and the resistance of the No.5 filter unit was the highest. 3) In the maximum air volume condition, CADR and CEE of the No.2 filter unit was the smallest, and CADR and CEE of the No.4 filter unit was the largest. The CADR and CEE of No.2 filter unit was about 7.13% and 6.54% of that of No.4 filter unit, respectively. Compared with No.2 filter unit, CADR and CEE of No.6 filter unit was increased by approximately 150% and 247%, respectively. The micro static charge electric module could promote the primary filtration efficiency and the PM_2.5 purification efficiency, and shorten the purification time effectively without increasing the resistance.
- filter units /
- PM_2.5 /
- CADR /
- CEE /
- air cleaner

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	LI T T, ZHANG Y, WANG J N, et al. All-cause mortality risk associated with long-term exposure to ambient PM_2.5 in China:a cohort study[J]. The Lancet Public Health, 2018, 3(10):470-477.
[2]	HU J L, HUANG L, CHEN M D, et al. Premature mortality attributable to particulate matter in China:source contributions and responses to reductions[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2017, 51(17):9950-9959.
[3]	崔晶晶,沈恒根,李擎.强电场介质装置对实际环境PM_2.5的净化效果[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(4):1500-1504.
[4]	MORAWSKA L, MILTON D K. It is time to address airborne transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19)[J]. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, 71(9):2311-2313.
[5]	GREENHALGH T, JIMENEZ J L, PRATHER K A, et al. Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2[J]. The Lancet, 2021, 397(10295):1603-1605.
[6]	LEONARDO S, FABRIZIO P, GIANLUIGI D G, et al. SARS-Cov-2 RNA found on particulate matter of Bergamo in Northern Italy:first preliminary evidence[J]. Environmental Research, 2020, 188:109754.
[7]	张梦娇,苏方成,徐起翔,等. 2013-2017年中国PM_2.5污染防治的健康效益评估[J].环境科学,2021,42(2):513-522.
[8]	郭二宝,沈恒根,张家文.国内外高中低档品牌香烟PM_2.5散发特性的试验研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(11):82-89.
[9]	WANG H Q. Ventilation, air conditioning and the indoor air environment[J]. Indoor and Built Environment, 2001, 10(1):52-57.
[10]	FRONTERA A, CIANFANELLI L, VLACHOS K, et al. Severe air pollution links to higher mortality in COVID-19 patients:the"double-hit"hypothesis[J]. Journal of Infection, 2020, 81(2):255-259.
[11]	WU X, NETHERY R C, SABATH M B, et al. Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the united states:strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis[J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(45):1-6.
[12]	ZHENG H T, ZHAO B, WANG S X, et al. Transition in source contributions of PM_2.5 exposure and associated premature mortality in China during 2005-2015[J]. Environment International, 2019, 132:105111.
[13]	DU L L, STUART B, EDITH P, et al. Particle concentrations and effectiveness of free-standing air filters in bedrooms of children with asthma in Detroit, Michigan[J]. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(11):2303-2313.
[14]	FISK W J. Health benefits of particle filtration[J]. Indoor Air Wiley Online Library, 2013, 23(5):357-368.
[15]	JU-HYEONG P, TAE J L, MI J P, et al. Effects of air cleaners and school characteristics on classroom concentrations of particulate matter in 34 elementary schools in Korea[J]. Building and Environment, 2020, 167:106437.
[16]	COX J, ISIUGO K, RYAN P, et al. Effectiveness of a portable air cleaner in removing aerosol particles in homes close to highways[J]. Indoor Air, 2018, 28(6):818-827.
[17]	BLUYSSEN P M, ORTIZ M, ZHANG D D. The effect of a mobile HEPA filter system on'infectious'aerosols, sound and air velocity in the SenseLab[J]. Building and Environment, 2021, 188(1):107475.
[18]	PEI C X, OU Q S,DAVID Y H. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on laboratory air filter loading test by hygroscopic salts[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 255:117679.
[19]	闫雪,刘兴成,沈恒根.含尘烟气净化用滤料性能测试与分析[J].环境工程,2018,36(8):92-97.
[20]	崔晶晶,杨学宾,沈恒根,等.不同过滤单元的室内空气净化器试验研究[J].暖通空调,2017,47(2):54-59.
[21]	FENG Z B, YANG J Y, ZHANG J. Numerical optimization on newly developed electrostatic enhanced pleated air filters for efficient removal of airborne ultra-fine particles:towards sustainable urban and built environment[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 255(54):102001.
[22]	张辉,贾颖,石彤,等.新型空气净化器净化性能研究[J].天津大学学报,2020,53(3):54-59.
[23]	王鹏,柳静献,毛宁,等.空气净化器去除细粒子性能试验研究[J].工业卫生与环保,2015,41(5):57-60.
[24]	王亚男,王宇. F级中效过滤器对细颗粒物过滤及容尘性能研究[J].天津城建大学学报,2020,6(3):225-230.
[25]	涂虬,向晓东.静电增强颗粒层除尘器除尘效率的理论与实验研究[J].武汉工程职业技术学院学报,2001,13(3):1-6.
[26]	荣伟东,张国权.静电增强纤维层过滤性能的研究[J].环境工程,1993,11(1):24-29.
[27]	高华东.细颗粒物净化滤料及应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2018.