中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
环境科学领域高质量科技期刊分级目录T2级期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
美国化学文摘社(CAS)数据库 收录期刊
日本JST China 收录期刊
世界期刊影响力指数(WJCI)报告 收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

铁盐与铝盐混凝去除EDTA土壤淋洗废液中砷、锑效果对比

袁明珠 丁雷 李爽 李永连

袁明珠, 丁雷, 李爽, 李永连. 铁盐与铝盐混凝去除EDTA土壤淋洗废液中砷、锑效果对比[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
引用本文: 袁明珠, 丁雷, 李爽, 李永连. 铁盐与铝盐混凝去除EDTA土壤淋洗废液中砷、锑效果对比[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
YUAN Mingzhu, DING Lei, LI Shuang, LI Yonglian. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
Citation: YUAN Mingzhu, DING Lei, LI Shuang, LI Yonglian. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017

铁盐与铝盐混凝去除EDTA土壤淋洗废液中砷、锑效果对比

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
基金项目: 

国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1802704)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    袁明珠(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为污水处理及资源化。751891580@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    丁雷(1978-),男,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为污水处理及资源化、土壤修复。leiding@ecust.edu.cn

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS

  • 摘要: 实验以三氯化铁和三氯化铝作为混凝剂,对比研究了混凝去除EDTA土壤淋洗废液中砷、锑的效果,重点探讨了反应终点pH、EDTA浓度、Fe/Al投加量以及共存重金属离子对砷、锑去除效果的影响。结果表明:1)对于EDTA土壤淋洗废液中As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)的去除,铝盐比铁盐效果更优;2)EDTA的存在不仅降低了铁盐/铝盐混凝对As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)的吸附去除效果,同时抑制了砷酸铁、锑酸铁等物质的生成,削弱了铁盐对As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)的沉淀去除。EDTA导致铁盐混凝过程中生成粒径较大、表面活性较低的稳定结晶态絮体;3)当c(EDTA)=0.05 mol/L时,在pH=5、ρ(Al)=2000 mg/L的条件下,铝盐对EDTA土壤淋洗废液中As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)的去除率分别高达98.00%和93.09%;4)共存重金属离子通过与EDTA络合,增加了絮体Al(OH)3的生成量,促进了As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)去除。由此表明,铝盐能够有效实现EDTA土壤淋洗废液中As(Ⅴ)、Sb(Ⅴ)的去除,对于推动基于EDTA的土壤淋洗技术的广泛应用具有重要意义。
  • [1] 刘乃静,李臻,赵银鑫,等.吴忠市表层土壤重金属污染及其潜在生态风险评价[J].科学技术与工程,2020, 20(17):7114-7121.
    [2] 胡疆.利用淋洗剂组合去除土壤中重金属及淋洗液回收技术研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2015.
    [3] 张富贵,彭敏,王惠艳,等.基于乡镇尺度的西南重金属高背景区土壤重金属生态风险评价[J].环境科学,2020, 41(9):4197-4209.
    [4] 谢运河,纪雄辉,吴家梅,等.不同有机肥对土壤镉锌生物有效性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015, 26(3):826-832.
    [5] LESTAN D, LUO C L, LI X D. The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils:a review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 153(1):3-13.
    [6] GUO X F, ZHAO G H, ZHANG G X, et al. Effect of mixed chelators of EDTA, GLDA, and citric acid on bioavailability of residual heavy metals in soils and soil properties[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 209:776-782.
    [7] LIAO X Y, LI Y, YAN X L. Removal of heavy metals and arsenic from a co-contaminated soil by sieving combined with washing process[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 41(3):202-210.
    [8] 陈寻峰,李小明,陈灿,等.砷污染土壤复合淋洗修复技术研究[J].环境科学,2016, 37(3):1147-1155.
    [9] 孙浩然.螯合剂淋洗修复土壤中As、Sb污染物实验研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2016.
    [10] WANG Q W, CHEN J J, ZHENG A H, et al. Dechelation of Cd-EDTA complex and recovery of EDTA from simulated soil-washing solution with sodium sulfide[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 220:1200-1207.
    [11] GILES D E, MOHAPATRA M, ISSA T B, et al. Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(12):3011-3022.
    [12] GUO W J, FU Z Y, WANG H, et al. Removal of antimonate (Sb (Ⅴ)) and antimonite (Sb (Ⅲ)) from aqueous solutions by coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS):dependence on influencing factors and insights into removal mechanisms[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644:1277-1285.
    [13] 陈桂霞,胡承志,朱灵峰,等.铝盐混凝除砷影响因素及机制研究[J].环境科学,2013, 34(4):1386-1391.
    [14] WANG Y L, LV C C, XIAO L, et al. Arsenic removal from alkaline leaching solution using Fe (Ⅲ) precipitation[J]. Environmental Technology, 2019, 40(13):1714-1720.
    [15] KOPARAL A S,ÖZGÜR R, ÖǦÜTVEREN Ü B, et al. Antimony removal from model acid solutions by electrodeposition[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004, 37(2):107-116.
    [16] NOWACK B, KARI F G, HILGER S U, et al. Determination of dissolved and adsorbed EDTA species in water and sediments by HPLC[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1996, 68(3):561-566.
    [17] AMSTAETTER K, BORCH T, LARESE-CASANOVA P, et al. Redox transformation of arsenic by Fe (Ⅱ)-activated goethite (α-FeOOH)[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2010, 44(1):102-108.
    [18] ZHANG T T, ZHAO Y L, KANG S C, et al. Formation of active Fe (OH)3 in situ for enhancing arsenic removal from water by the oxidation of Fe (Ⅱ) in air with the presence of CaCO3[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 227:1-9.
    [19] ANDEREGG G, ARNAUD-NEU F, DELGADO R, et al. Critical evaluation of stability constants of metal complexes of complexones for biomedical and environmental applications (IUPAC Technical Report)[J]. Pure&Applied Chemistry, 2005, 77(8):1445-1495.
    [20] GUO X J, WU Z J, HE M C. Removal of antimony (Ⅴ) and antimony (Ⅲ) from drinking water by coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS)[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(17):4327-4235.
    [21] 王文龙,胡洪营,刘玉红,等.混凝和强化混凝对印染废水中锑(Ⅴ)的去除特性[J].环境科学学报,2019, 39(10):3374-3380.
    [22] YANG K L, ZHOU J S, LOU Z M, et al. Removal of Sb (Ⅴ) from aqueous solutions using Fe-Mn binary oxides:the influence of iron oxides forms and the role of manganese oxides[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 354:577-588.
    [23] MERTENS J, CASENTINI B, MASION A, et al. Polyaluminum chloride with high Al30 content as removal agent for arsenic-contaminated well water[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(1):53-62.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  196
  • HTML全文浏览量:  30
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-07-06

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回