进水条件对侧流活性污泥水解工艺性能和微生物的影响

刘玉龙; 张智锋; 张黎; 张喆; 秦璐; 柴国栋; 郑兴; 王东琦

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202205021

进水条件对侧流活性污泥水解工艺性能和微生物的影响

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205021

刘玉龙¹,
张智锋¹,
张黎¹,
张喆²,
秦璐²,
柴国栋²,
郑兴²,
王东琦^2,3, ,

1. 中圣环境科技发展有限公司, 西安 710054;
2. 西安理工大学市政工程系, 西安 710048;
3. 陕西省水资源与环境重点实验室, 西安 710048

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52070156)

陕西省教育厅科研计划项目(17JS097)

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2020JM-460)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘玉龙(1979-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为水污染控制工程。18018655@qq.com

通讯作者:
王东琦,男,副教授,主要研究方向为污水处理与资源化。wangdq@xaut.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 179
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-03-29
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-02

EFFECT OF INFLUENT CONDITIONS ON PERFORMANCE AND MICROORGANISMS IN THE SIDE-STREAM ACTIVATED SLUDGE HYDROLYSIS PROCESS

1. Zhongsheng Environmental Technology Development Co., Ltd, Xi'an 710054, China;
2. Department of Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;
3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Xi'an 710048, China

摘要

摘要: 针对传统生物脱氮除磷工艺性能易受进水条件变化影响的缺点,构建了侧流活性污泥水解(SSH)工艺反应器,比较研究了该反应器与常规厌氧/缺氧/好氧(A²/O)工艺反应器在不同进水条件下的污染物处理性能和微生物群落的变化规律。试验结果表明:A²/O和SSH反应器化学需氧量(COD)去除性能的变化较小,整体COD去除率均维持在90%左右。进水负荷和流量的升高有利于提高脱氮除磷效果。A²/O和SSH反应器的总氮去除率分别从阶段Ⅰ的58%和72%升高到阶段Ⅲ的67%和83%,总磷去除率均从60%左右升高到85%以上。与A²/O反应器相比,进水条件变化对SSH反应器脱氮性能的影响较小。相同进水条件下SSH反应器脱氮性能更好,总氮平均去除率比A²/O反应器高出23%。高通量测序结果表明,SSH反应器中微生物群落的多样性更高,Dechloromonas、Accumulibacter等脱氮除磷功能菌的相对丰度更高,是反应器出水水质良好且稳定的重要原因。研究成果可为SSH工艺的设计与实际应用提供参考依据。
- 侧流活性污泥水解 /
- 生物脱氮除磷 /
- 生物处理技术 /
- 微生物群落结构
Abstract: The treatment performance of the traditional biological phosphorus removal process is vulnerable to the change of influent conditions. To solve this problem, a side-stream activated sludge hydrolysis(SSH) reactor was constructed. The changes in pollutant removal performance and microbial community structure in the SSH reactor and conventional anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic(A²/O) reactor were compared under different influent conditions. The results showed that little change in chemical oxygen demand(COD) removal performance was observed in A²/O and SSH reactors, with COD removal efficiencies of 90%. The increase in influent load and flow rate improved the nitrogen and phosphorus removal performance. The total nitrogen removal efficiency in A²/O and SSH reactors increased from 58% and 72% in Phase Ⅰ, to 67% and 83% in Phase Ⅲ, respectively, whereas the total phosphorus removal efficiency increased from 60% to 80% above. Compared to the A²/O reactor, the change in influent conditions had lower impact on the nitrogen removal performance in the SSH reactor. Under the same influent condition, the nitrogen removal performance in the SSH reactor was more effective, with an average total nitrogen removal efficiency 23% higher than that in the A²/O reactor. The high-throughput sequencing results showed that the SSH reactor had higher microbial community diversity and relative abundances of functional microorganisms for nutrient removal such as Dechloromonas, Accumulibacter, which contributed to its effective and stable reactor performance. The results provided references for the design and practical application of SSH process.
- side-stream activated sludge hydrolysis /
- biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal /
- biological treatment technology /
- microbial community structure

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	彭永臻.应尽快遏制城市污水处理排放标准盲目提高至地表水质Ⅳ类或Ⅲ类的趋势:在《水污染防治法》实施情况专家评估座谈会上的发言摘[J].中国给水排水,2019,35(8):12-14.
[2]	蒋松竹,郭黎卿,尹训飞,等.美国污水处理厂深度除磷技术分析[J].环境污染与防治,2015,37(3):102-106.
[3]	北京市环境保护局.北京城镇污水处理厂水污染物排放标准:DB 11/890-2012[S].2012.
[4]	WILFERT P,KUMAR P S,KORVING L,et al.The relevance of phosphorus and iron chemistry to the recovery of phosphorus from wastewater:a review[J].Environmental Science& Technology,2015,49(16):9400-9414.
[5]	郝晓地,方晓敏,李天宇,等.污水处理厂升级改造中的认识误区[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(4):10-15.
[6]	BARNARD J,ABRAHAM K.Key features of successful BNR operation[J].Water Science and Technology,2006,53(12):1-9.
[7]	CAO Y S,van LOOSDRECHT M C M,DAIGGER G.The bottlenecks and causes,and potential solutions for municipal Sewage treatment in China[J].Water Practice and Technology,2019,15(1):160-169.
[8]	GU A Z,SAUNDER A,NEETHLIN J,et al.Functionally relevant microorganisms to enhanced biological phosphorus removal performance at full-scale wastewater treatment plants in the United States[J].Water Environment Research,2008,80(8):688-698.
[9]	VOLLERTSEN J,PETERSEN G,BORREGAARD V R.Hydrolysis and fermentation of activated sludge to enhance biological phosphorus removal[J].Water Science& Technology,2006,53(12):55.
[10]	BARNARD J L,DUNLAP P,STEICHEM M.Rethinking the mechanisms of biological phosphorus removal[J].Water Environment Research,2017,89(11):2043-2054.
[11]	刘智晓.生物除磷理论及实践新突破:从主流EBPR到侧流EBPR[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(24):19-25.
[12]	曲久辉,王凯军,王洪臣,等.建设面向未来的中国污水处理概念厂[N].中国环境报,2014-1-7.
[13]	MIELCZAREK A T,NGUYEN H T T,NIELSEN J L,et al.Population dynamics of bacteria involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal in Danish wastewater treatment facilities[J].Water Research,2013,47(4):1529-1544.
[14]	LANHAM A B,OEHMEN A,SAUNDERS A M,et al.Metabolic versatility in full-scale wastewater treatment facilities performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal[J].Water Research,2013,47(19):7032-7041.
[15]	WANG D Q,TOOKER N B,SRINIVASAN V,et al.Side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal (S2EBPR) process improves system performance-a full-scale comparative study[J].Water Research,2019,167:115109.
[16]	ONNIS-HAYDEN A,SRINIVASAN V,TOOKER N B,et al.Survey of full scale side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal (S2EBPR) systems and comparison with conventional EBPRs in North America:process stability,kinetics and microbial populations[J].Water Environment Research,2020,92(3):403-417.
[17]	SMOLDER G J F,van DER M J,van LOOSDRECHT M C M,et al.Model of the anaerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process:stoichiometry and pH influence[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,1994,43(6):461-470.
[18]	国家环保局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[19]	王海东,王淑莹,彭永臻.进水负荷对硝化菌与异养菌竞争关系的影响[J].中国给水排水,2006,22(23):26-29.
[20]	REN J H,CHENG W,WAN T,et al.Effect of aeration rates on hydraulic characteristics and pollutant removal in an up-flow biological aerated filter[J].Environmental Science:Water Research& Technology,2018,4(12):2041-2050.
[21]	王鑫毅,谢骁,金珊,等.基于高通量测序的缢蛏及其养殖塘菌群结构的季节变化[J].应用生态学报.2019,30(12):4267-4276.
[22]	夏瑜,何绪文,文湘华.微生物群落多样性数学表征方法及其在污水处理系统研究中的应用[J].微生物学通报,2018,45(8):1778-1786.
[23]	LAWSON C E,STRACHAN B J,HANSON N W,et al.Rare taxa have potential to make metabolic contributions in enhanced biological phosphorus removal ecosystems[J].Environmental Microbiology,2015,17(12):4979-4993.
[24]	郑林雪,军李,胡家玮,等.同步硝化反硝化系统中反硝化细菌多样性研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,33(1):116-121.
[25]	NIELSEN P H,MIELCZAREK A T,KRAGELUND C,et al.A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants[J].Water Research,2010,44(17):5070-5088.
[26]	彭永臻,钱雯婷,王琦.基于宏基因组的城市污水处理厂生物脱氮污泥菌群结构分析[J].北京工业大学学报,2019,45(1):95-102.
[27]	NIERYCHLO M,ANDERSEN K S,XU Y,et al.Species-level microbiome composition of activated sludge-introducing MiDAS 3 ecosystem-specific reference database and taxonomy[J].BioRxiv,2019:842393.