SUITABILITY EVALUATION OF RIPARIAN ZONE OF CLEAR WATER GALLERY BASED ON AHP
-
摘要: 清水廊道陆向缓冲带是截留陆域污染入河前的最重要生态屏障,评价其工程适宜性,不仅要体现出陆向缓冲带对外源污染物拦截效果以及所选缓冲带技术本身的特点,还要体现出污染物拦截技术对于清水廊道周边环境、社会和经济等方面综合影响。基于层次分析法,选取了18个评价指标,构建清水廊道陆向缓冲带工程适宜性评价体系,并对光明大堰河清水廊道陆向缓冲带污染拦截工程进行适宜性评价。结果表明:在所评价的8个河段中,非常适宜的河段占62.5%,适宜的河段占37.5%,河段总体处于污染拦截效果较好状态。基于层次分析法的清水廊道陆向缓冲带污染拦截工程评价方法可将河岸带的功能管理、植被及生态重建、土地利用、滨水区规划和设计融入工程评价中,为清水廊道工程的实施提供理论支撑和数据支持。Abstract: Riparian zone of the clear water gallery(RZCWG) is the most important ecological protective screen for intercepting terrestrial contaminants. Therefore, to evaluate the suitability of RZCWG, it should not only evaluate the results of RZCWG for intercepting exogenous contaminants, but also reflect the technical features of intercepting exogenous contaminants for RZCWG and the comprehensive effect on the environment, society and economics. Based on the analytic hierarchy process, this paper selected 18 evaluation indexes to construct the suitability evaluation system for the riparian zone of project of the clear water gallery and evaluate the suitability of the landward buffer zone pollution interception project of the clear water gallery of Guangming Dayan River. The evaluation results indicated that the evaluated river was in a very suitable state of intercepting exogenous contaminants, in which 62.5% sections were in a very suitable state and 37.5% sections were in a suitable state. The evaluation method for RZCWG based on AHP could integrate the function management of riparian zone, vegetation and ecological reconstruction, land utilization, waterfront planning and design of the project evaluation of RZCWG, and provide support for the implementation of RZCWG projects.
-
Key words:
- clear water gallery /
- riparian zone /
- AHP /
- evaluation of riparian zone
-
[1] 邓红兵,王青春,王庆礼,等.河岸植被缓冲带与河岸带管理[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):951-954. [2] 岳隽,王仰麟.国内外河岸带研究的进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(5):33-38. [3] 郭二辉,孙然好,陈利顶.河岸植被缓冲带主要生态服务功能研究的现状与展望[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(8):1830-1837. [4] 汤家喜,孙丽娜,孙铁珩,等.河岸缓冲带对氮磷的截留转化及其生态恢复研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(8):1514-1520. [5] 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988. [6] SAATY R W.The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used[J].Mathl Modelling,1987,9(3/4/5):161-176. [7] RAMANATHAN R.A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2001,63:27-35. [8] VAIDYA O S,KUMAR S.Analytic hierarchy process:an overview of applications[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,169:1-29. [9] 庄世坚,叶丽娜.风景区环境质量评价层次分析法[J].环境工程,1987,5(6):52-57. [10] 何冰,欧厚金.区域水污染物削减总量分配的层次分析方法[J].环境工程,1991,9(6):50-53. [11] 胡天觉,陈维平,曾光明,等.运用层次分析法对株洲霞湾污水处理厂污水处理工艺方案择优[J].环境工程,2000,18(1):61-63. [12] 刘宁,田力威,赵宏伟.基于层次分析法的徒骇河适宜性评价[J].环境工程,2016,34(4):142-145. [13] 周文武,陈冠益,旦增,等.垃圾填埋场区域地下水铅的修复方案比选:以拉萨市为例[J].环境工程,2020,38(6):88-93. [14] 刘思瑶,赵锐,俞阳,等.基于多要素指标评估的小流域水体管控单元划分研究:以南河为例[J].环境工程,2020,38(12):78-85. [15] 要杰,张越.模糊层次分析法在保定市城镇污水处理技术综合评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2013,31(4):132-134. [16] 王妍方,尹雪梅,程希平.基于FAHP模型的攀枝花旅游气候舒适度分析[J].环境工程,2016,34(增刊1):1083-1086. [17] 黄书君,李坤权,朱光怡.基于模糊层次分析模型的高校室内空气质量评价与分析[J].环境工程,2014,32(5):90-94.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 159
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0