焦化厂VOCs的臭氧生成潜势及二次有机气溶胶生成潜势分析

肖凯; 张晓伟; 郝志飞; 张永锋; 孙俊民

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202209003

焦化厂VOCs的臭氧生成潜势及二次有机气溶胶生成潜势分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209003

肖凯^1,2,
张晓伟^1,2,
郝志飞^1,2,
张永锋^1,2, ,,
孙俊民^1,2

1. 内蒙古工业大学化工学院, 呼和浩特 010051;
2. 内蒙古自治区煤基固废高效循环利用重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010051

基金项目:

内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2018ZD01)

内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(RZ1900000373)

详细信息

作者简介:
肖凯(1996-),男,硕士,主要从事焦化厂废气治理。15149303154@163.com

通讯作者:
张永锋(1974-),男,教授,主要从事燃煤烟气污染协同控制、硅基多孔新材料与污染控制等技术的研究。environzyf@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 447
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-25
- 网络出版日期: 2022-11-09

ANALYSIS OF OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL AND SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL FORMATION POTENTIAL OF VOCs IN A COKING PLANT

1. Institute of Chemical Industry, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Coal-based Solid Waste Efficient Recycling in Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010051, China

摘要

摘要: 焦化厂因其工艺特殊,SO₂、NO_x、颗粒物及VOCs的排放问题较为突出。故对焦化厂厂界环境空气VOCs排放特征进行分析,并依据最大增量反应活性(MIR)法和等效丙烯浓度(PEC)法对VOCs的臭氧生成潜势(OFP)进行评估,依据气溶胶生成系数(FAC)法对VOCs二次有机气溶胶生成潜势(SOAFP)进行评估。结果表明:1)厂界上、下风向5个点位共分析出包括芳香烃、卤代烃、烯烃、硫化物、酮类在内的17种VOCs; 2)不同区域厂界检出的VOCs差异显著,总质量浓度为28.2~167.9μg/m³,其中芳香烃在各点位TVOCs中占比最大,达到51.01%~84.63%;3)脱硫提盐冷鼓区域边界OFP最大,理论值为335.51μg/m³,办公生活区边界OFP最小,理论值为47.06μg/m³,芳香烃对OFP贡献率为27.21%~62.37%,烯烃为39.17%~61.84%,卤代烃为2.08%~14.56%;通过PEC法估算OFP,结果变化趋势与MIR法结果相一致,等效丙烯浓度为3.11~31.89μg/m³;且1—5点位芳香烃的等效丙烯浓度贡献率分别为37.10%、51.46%、66.79%、58.80%和22.74%;4)1—5点位SOAFP分别为0.452,0.938,2.517,4.055,0.495μg/m³;芳香烃对SOAFP贡献最大。丙烯、甲苯、二甲苯、氯乙烯等质量浓度和反应活性均较大的物质,是需要优先控制的VOCs组分,可作为焦化厂环境空气VOCs的标志物。
- 焦化行业 /
- 挥发性有机物(VOCs) /
- 臭氧生成潜势(OFP) /
- 二次有机气溶胶生成潜势(SOAFP)
Abstract: Due to the special process of the coking plant, the emission problems of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and VOCs are more prominent. Therefore, the emission characteristics of VOCs in the ambient air at the boundary of the coking plant were analyzed, the ozone formation potential of VOCs was evaluated according to the maximum incremental reaction activity method(MIR) and propylene-equivalent concentration method(PEC), and the secondary organic aerosol formation potential of VOCs was evaluated, according to the fractional aerosol coefficients method(FAC). The results showed that: 1) a total of 17 VOCs including aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons, olefins, sulfides and ketones were analyzed at five points in the upwind and downwind direction of the factory boundary. 2) There were significant differences in VOCs detected at the plant boundary in different regions, and the total mass concentration was 28.2~167.9 μg/m³, in which aromatic hydrocarbons accounted for the largest proportion in TVOCs at each point, reaching 51.01%~84.63%. 3) The OFP at the boundary of the cold drum of desulfurization and salt extraction was the largest, with a theoretical value of 335.51 μg/m³, and the OFP at the boundary of office and living area was the smallest, with a theoretical value of 47.06 μg/m³. The contribution rate of aromatic hydrocarbons to OFP was 27.21%~62.37%, that of olefins was 39.17%~61.84%, and that of halogenated hydrocarbons was 2.08%~14.56%. The change trend of OFP estimated by PEC method was consistent with that of MIR method, and the propylene-equivalent concentration range was 3.11~31.89 μg/m³; the contribution rates of propylene-equivalent concentration of aromatic hydrocarbons at each point were 37.10%, 51.46%, 66.79%, 58.80% and 22.74%, respectively. 4) The formation potential of SOA at each point was 0.452, 0.938, 2.517, 4.055, 0.495 μg/m³, respectively; aromatic hydrocarbons contributed the most to the formation potential of SOA. Substances with high mass concentration and reaction activity, such as propylene, toluene, xylene and vinyl chloride, were the VOCs components that need priority control and could be used as markers of VOCs in the ambient air of coking plants.
- coking industry /
- volatile organic compounds (VOCs) /
- ozone formation potential (OFP) /
- secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAFP)

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	GAO Y Q,LI M,WAN X,et al.Important contributions of alkenes and aromatics to VOCs emissions,chemistry and secondary pollutants formation at an industrial site of central eastern China[J].Atmospheric Environment,2021,244:117927.
[2]	CHEN S C,HUANG Y Y,CHEN M,et al.Research progress on the monitoring of precursor of atmospheric ozone-volatile organic compounds[J].Meteorological and Environmental Research,2020,11(2):29-36.
[3]	XIONG Y,ZHOU J B,XING Z Y,et al.Optimization of a volatile organic compound control strategy in an oil industry center in Canada by evaluating ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation potential[J].Environmental Research,2020,191:110217.
[4]	张宇晴.中国不同区域大气二次有机气溶胶的观测研究[D].广州:中国科学院大学(广州地球化学研究所),2020.
[5]	胡江亮,赵永,王建成,等.焦化行业VOCs排放特征与控制技术研究进展[J].洁净煤技术,2019,25(6):24-31.
[6]	LI J,ZHOU Y,SIMAYI M,et al.Spatial-temporal variations and reduction potentials of volatile organic compound emissions from the coking industry in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,214:224-235.
[7]	REN X,WEN Y P,HE Q S,et al.Higher contribution of coking sources to ozone formation potential from volatile organic compounds in summer in Taiyuan,China[J].Atmospheric Pollution Research,2021,12(6):101083.
[8]	张莹,邓建国,王刚,等.典型钢铁焦化厂可凝结颗粒物排放特征[J].环境工程,2020,38(9):154-158 ,125.
[9]	付加鹏,金春江,程星星,等.重点行业VOCs排放特征统计分析[J].环境工程,2020,38(6):188-194 ,125.
[10]	ZHANG J F,WEI Y J,FANG Z F,et al.Ozone pollution:a major health hazard worldwide[J].Frontiers in Immunology,2019,10:2518.
[11]	VINOD K,VINAYAK S.Season-wise analyses of VOCs,hydroxyl radicals and ozone formation chemistry over north-west India reveal isoprene and acetaldehyde as the most potent ozone precursors throughout the year[J].Chemosphere,2021,283:131184.
[12]	刘文文,方莉,郭秀锐,等.京津冀地区典型印刷企业VOCs排放特征及臭氧生成潜势分析[J].环境科学,2019,40(9):3942-3948.
[13]	GAO M P,TENG W,DU Z X,et al.Source profiles and emission factors of VOCs from solvent-based architectural coatings and their contributions to ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation in China[J].Chemosphere,2021,275:129815.
[14]	WANG H L,HAO R,FANG L,et al.Study on emissions of volatile organic compounds from a typical coking chemical plant in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,752:141927.
[15]	ZHANG X M,WANG D,LIU Y,et al.Characteristics and ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds in emissions from a typical Chinese coking plant[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2020,95(9):183-189.
[16]	刘利军,谢莹,韩强,等.山西省典型炼焦企业化产工段挥发性有机物排放特征及臭氧生成潜势[J].环境污染与防治,2019,41(11):1278-1285.
[17]	环境保护部,国家质量检验检疫总局.炼焦化学工业污染物排放标准:GB 16171—2012[S]北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
[18]	环境保护部.环境空气挥发性有机物的测定罐采样/气相色谱-质谱法:HJ 759—2015[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2015.
[19]	ATKINSON R,AREY J.Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds[J].Chem Inform,2004,35(10):4605-4638.
[20]	CARTER W P.Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism[J].Atmospheric Environment,2010,44(10):5324-5335.
[21]	CARTER W P.Updated maximum incremental reactivity scale and hydrocarbon bin reactivities for regulatory applications [EB/OL].http://www.cert.ucr.edu/-carter/SAPRC/MIR10.pdf,2010-01-28.
[22]	GROSJEAN D.In situ organic aerosol formation during a smog episode:estimated production and chemical functionality[J].Atmospheric Environment.Part A.General Topics,1992,26(6):953-963.
[23]	GROSJEAN D,SEINFELD J H.Parameterization of the formation potential of secondary organic aerosols[J].Atmospheric Environment (1967),1989,23(8):1733-1747.
[24]	李颖慧,李如梅,胡冬梅,等.太原市不同功能区环境空气中挥发性有机物特征与来源解析[J].环境化学,2020,39(4):920-930.
[25]	YAN Y L,PENG L,LI R,et al.Concentration,ozone formation potential and source analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a thermal power station centralized area:a study in Shuozhou,China[J].Environmental Pollution,2017,223:295-304.
[26]	高志凤,张晓红,赵文娟,等.典型焦化厂大气挥发性有机物排放表征分析[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(9):1540-1545.
[27]	王学臣,田亮,崔建升,等.焦化工艺厂界无组织VOCs排放特性分析[J].煤炭与化工,2019,42(12):139-143 ,150.
[28]	郭鹏,仝纪龙,刘永乐,等.机械化炼焦VOCs排放源成分谱分析[J].环境科学与技术,2020,43(5):103-114.
[29]	贾记红,黄成,陈长虹,等.炼焦过程挥发性有机物排放特征及其大气化学反应活性[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(5):905-912.
[30]	武蕾丹,王秀艳,杨文,等.某工业园区VOCs臭氧生成潜势及优控物种[J].环境科学,2018,39(2):511-516.