采用清洗-热脱附工艺修复石蜡基与环烷基原油污染土壤

牛明芬; 刘馨芷; 郭英达; 李刚; 李柏林; 郭书海

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

采用清洗-热脱附工艺修复石蜡基与环烷基原油污染土壤

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

牛明芬^1,2,
刘馨芷^1,2,
郭英达³,
李刚^3,2, ,,
李柏林⁴,
郭书海^3,2

1. 沈阳建筑大学市政与环境工程学院, 沈阳 110168;
2. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
3. 污染土壤生物-物化协同修复技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 沈阳 110016;
4. 东北石油大学, 黑龙江大庆 163318

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1801900)

广西科技重大专项(桂科AA18118013-13)

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA23010400)

详细信息

作者简介:
牛明芬(1967-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向为污染控制与治理技术、固体废弃物处理。niumingfen@sina.com

通讯作者:
李刚(1981-),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为污染土壤修复技术。ligang@iae.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 220
- HTML全文浏览量: 25
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-11-16
- 网络出版日期: 2022-11-09

WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL

NIU Ming-fen^1,2,
LIU Xin-zhi^1,2,
GUO Ying-da³,
LI Gang^{3,2
, ,},
LI Bo-lin⁴,
GUO Shu-hai^3,2

1. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang Jinzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;
2. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
3. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Contaminated Soil Remediation by Bio-physicochemical Synergistic Process, Shenyang 110016, China;
4. Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China

摘要

摘要: 石油污染土壤修复工艺的选择及其应用效果受原油属性影响明显。选取石蜡基和环烷基2类原油污染土壤,采用清洗预处理-热脱附方法,研究耦合工艺的修复效能,重点比较清洗对土壤粒级的分离效果,表面活性剂对石油污染物的脱附效率,药剂清洗前后的土壤热脱附修复效果等。结果表明:清洗后2种土壤的砂质组分吸附的石油类脱附率约为59.83%和36.42%,远高于黏质组分。阴离子型α-十六烯基磺酸钠脱附能力更强,石蜡基和环烷基2类油源污染土壤的石油类脱附率为46.5%和39.8%。以环烷基土壤为例,将药剂清洗后分离出的黏粒土进行热脱附,与未清洗的原污染土壤相比,前者脱附所用时间更短。400℃下热脱附3 h,石油类含量降至0.26%。采取清洗-热脱附工艺开展现场试验,清洗后粗粒级砂质土壤的石油类含量为1.56%,黏粒土脱水后热脱附,石油类含量可达到0.57%,清洗-热脱附修复污染土壤能耗低于单纯热脱附工艺。
- 石油污染土壤 /
- 清洗 /
- 热脱附 /
- 耦合工艺
Abstract: The properties of crude oil will directly affect the selection of polluted soil remediation technology. Paraffin and naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soils were selected, and the coupling technology of soil washing and thermal desorption were adopted to investigate the desorption ratios of petroleum and energy consumption. The particular concern was focused on the screening effect of washing pretreatment on soil particle size, desorption rate of petroleum pollutants, the effect of thermal desorption remediation on reagent washed soil, etc. The results showed that after water washing pretreatment, the desorption rate of petroleum adsorbed by large particle size sand in soil was about 59.83% and 36.42%, much higher than the clay component. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate and isomeric alcohol ethoxylate were used during washing process. The desorption rates of petroleum in paraffin based and naphthenic crude oil contaminated soil were 46.5% and 39.8% respectively. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate had a stronger desorption ability. Naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soil was remediated by thermal desorption, the desorption time of clay component after washing was shorter than the raw contaminated soil. The content of petroleum was decreased to 0.26% after thermal desorption at 400 ℃ for 3 hours. The washing-thermal desorption coupling technology was adopted for field test, and the petroleum content of large particle size sand after washing was 1.56%, and 0.57% for the dewatered clay by thermal desorption. The energy consumption of washing-thermal desorption was lower than the single thermal desorption technology.
- petroleum contaminated soil /
- soil washing /
- thermal desorption /
- coupling technology

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	陈敏.石油污染土壤修复技术研究进展[J].广东化工,2020,47(23):100-101 ,84.
[2]	刘仁华,朱开贞,孙加山,等.热脱附技术分类及应用[J].广州化工,2021,49(13):23-26.
[3]	张亚峰,安路阳,王风贺.有机污染场地土壤热解吸技术研究进展[J].环境保护科学,2021,47(1):124-135.
[4]	王开阳,刘龙杰,邵志国,等.热脱附处理技术在石油污染土壤中的研究进展[J].山西化工,2020,40(4):22-25.
[5]	龙飞,郭斌,王欣.石油污染土壤热脱附技术的研究现状与展望[J].山东化工,2020,49(24):70-72.
[6]	WANG B,WU A J,LI X D,et al.Progress in fundamental research on thermal desorption remediation of organic compound-contaminated soil[J].Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy,2021,2:83-95.
[7]	杨振,柳林杉,刘明杰,等.油浸泥土热脱附修复小试实验条件的探索[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(10):2320-2327.
[8]	许优,顾海林,詹明秀,等.有机污染土壤异位直接热脱附装置节能降耗方案[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(9):2074-2082.
[9]	FALCIGLIA P P,GIUSTRA M G.Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil:influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,185(1):392-400.
[10]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[11]	牟炳昶.土壤有机质的测定(改进的重铬酸钾法)[J].内蒙古水利科技,1987(4):31-32.
[12]	王秀颖,高晓飞,刘和平,等.土壤水稳性大团聚体测定方法综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):106-113.
[13]	陈翠玲.吸管法测定土壤机械组成及土壤微团聚体吸样时间的探讨[J].河南职业技术师范学院学报,1994,22(4):69-70.
[14]	王如刚,王敏,牛晓伟,等.超声-索氏萃取-重量法测定土壤中总石油烃含量[J].分析化学,2010,38(3):417-420.
[15]	蒲海源,刁长军,罗治江,等.石油族组分分离及分析方法研究现状[J].辽宁化工,2012,41(12):1322-1326.
[16]	ZHANG T,CHENG J J,TAN H Y,et al.Particle-size-based elution of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil by surfactant mixture[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,302(PA):113983-113983.
[17]	赵宇光,梁成华,杜立宇,等.长期定位施肥设施土壤微团聚体磷素吸附解吸特征性探讨[J].北方园艺,2009(5):1-4.
[18]	WANG X S.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particle-size fractions of urban topsoils[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(6):2855-2864.
[19]	LI Y.Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2013,72(3/4):371-381.
[20]	余锦涛,马晓宇,张长波.黏性土壤淋洗修复过程中粒径高效分级系统的研发及应用[J].环境工程,2021,39(6):160-166.
[21]	王琦,郭书海,李刚,等.表面活性剂-无机电解质-石油烃的匹配性与石油污染土壤清洗性能[J].环境工程,2021,39(3):195-203 ,110.