厨余垃圾半连续干式厌氧发酵的影响因素研究

赵丽雅; 林佩茹; 郑义; 王攀; 任连海

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202211017

厨余垃圾半连续干式厌氧发酵的影响因素研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211017

北京工商大学生态环境学院国家环境保护食品链污染防治重点实验室, 北京 100048

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划"固废资源化"重点专项（2019YFC1906303）；国家自然科学基金（42007350）；北京市自然科学基金（8202010）；2022年研究生科研能力提升计划项目（202202）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵丽雅(1998-),女,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为固体废弃物处理与处置。wya2829@163.com

通讯作者:
王攀(1983-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向为固体废弃物处理与处置。wangpan024@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 105
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-17
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-24

INFLUENCING FACTORS OF SEMI-CONTINUOUS DRY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, School of Ecology and Environment, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

摘要

摘要: 探究了半连续干式厌氧发酵过程中有机负荷（organic loading rate，OLR）、搅拌速率和物料停留时间对甲烷产量的影响；并采用结构方程模型探究调控因素与厌氧体系中间产物和甲烷产量的动态变化。结果表明：提高OLR至5.5 g VS/（L·d）时，产甲烷效果最佳，平均日甲烷产量达到3084.40 mL/（L·d）。提高搅拌速率和物料停留时间可促进甲烷产生，但过低或过高的停留时间会导致NH₄⁺-N和VFAs积累并抑制厌氧产甲烷过程；综合考虑，搅拌速率为20 r/min，停留时间为1 d最有利于甲烷的生成。结构方程模型结果显示：在厨余垃圾半连续干式厌氧发酵过程中，搅拌速率和物料停留时间对甲烷产量的影响大于OLR，其标准总效应分别为0.435、0.370和-0.04，这主要是由于提高搅拌速率有效缓解了干式厌氧发酵中VFAs对甲烷产量的抑制效应。
- 干式厌氧发酵 /
- 厨余垃圾 /
- 甲烷产量 /
- 结构方程模型
Abstract: The study investigated the effects of organic loading rate (OLR), stirring rate and material retention time on methane production in semi-continuous dry anaerobic fermentation, and used a structural equation model to discuss the dynamics of the regulating factors on the intermediate products and methane production in the anaerobic system. The results showed that when the OLR was increased to 5.5 g VS/(L·d), the methane production reached the peak, and the average daily methane production reached 3084.40 mL/(L·d). Increasing the stirring rate and material retention time could promote methane production, but a lower or higher material retention time led to the accumulation of NH₄⁺-N and VFAs, and inhibited the anaerobic methanogenesis process. The stirring rate of 20 r/min and solid retention time of 1 d were synthetically considered as the most favorable condition for methane synthesis. The structural equation model results revealed that the influence of stirring rate and material retention time on methane production in semi-continuous dry anaerobic fermentation of kitchen waste was greater than that of OLR, and the standardized total effect were 0.435, 0.370 and -0.04, respectively, mainly because the rise of stirring rate effectively relieved the inhibition effect of VFAs on methane production in dry anaerobic fermentation.
- dry anaerobic fermentation /
- kitchen waste /
- methane production /
- structural equation model

HTML全文

参考文献(28)

[1]	ZHANG Y C, WU D, SU Y L, et al. Occurrence, influence and removal strategies of mycotoxins, antibiotics and microplastics in anaerobic digestion treating food waste and co-digestive biosolids:a critical review[J]. Bioresource Technology,2021,330:124987.
[2]	LI Q, YUWEN C S, CHENG X R, et al. Responses of microbial capacity and community on the performance of mesophilic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge in a high-frequency feeding CSTR[J]. Bioresource Technology,2018,260:85-94.
[3]	杨林海.有机垃圾干式厌氧发酵处理试验研究[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2013.
[4]	李娜.农村混合废物干式厌氧发酵工艺优化及沼渣的综合利用[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2018.
[5]	方少辉. 农村混合物斜干式厌氧发酵生物质能源转化的特性研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2012.
[6]	ZHENG Y, WANG P, YANG X Y, et al. Process performance and microbial communities in anaerobic Co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with a lower range of carbon/nitrogen ratio. Bioenerg. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10357-2.
[7]	BI S J, HONG X J, YANG H Z, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and food waste[J]. Renewable Energy,2020,150:213-220.
[8]	JANG H M, KIM J H, HA J H, et al. Bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities during the single-stage anaerobic digestion of high-strength food wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology,2014,165:174-182.
[9]	GANESH R, TORRIJOS M, SOUSBIE P, et al. Single-phase and two-phase anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste:comparison of start-up, reactor stability and process performance[J]. Waste management (New York, N.Y.),2014,34(5):875-885.
[10]	DAI X H, DUAN N N, DONG B, et al. High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions:stability and performance[J]. Waste Management,2013,33(2):308-326.
[11]	赵明星,高常卉,李娟,等.餐厨垃圾厌氧干发酵制氢及其强化研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2021,47(22):157-161.
[12]	ABUBACKAR H N, KESKIN T, ARSLAN, et al. Effects of size and autoclavation of fruit and vegetable wastes on biohydrogen production by dark dry anaerobic fermentation under mesophilic condition[J]. Pergamon,2019,44(33):17767-17780.
[13]	彭朝晖,樊战辉,孙家宾,等. 搅拌时间和顶空低压对猪粪产甲烷速率的影响[J].中国沼气,2017,35(6):50-55.
[14]	LAIQ U R M, IQBAL A, CHANG C, et al. Water environment research:a research publication of the Water Environment Federation[J]. Anaerobic Digestion,2019,91(10):.
[15]	国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 2版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009.
[16]	国家环境保护总局.水质化学需氧量的测定快速消解分光光度法:HJ/T 399-2007[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2007.
[17]	国家环境保护总局.水质氨氮的测定纳氏试剂分光光度法:HJ/T 535-2009[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009.
[18]	ZHANG X J, ZHAN Y B, ZHANG H, et al. Inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus) regulates microbial interaction to improve phosphorus fractions mobilization during kitchen waste composting[J]. Bioresource Technology,2021,340:125714.
[19]	朱教宁,李永平,庞震鹏,等. 机械搅拌强度对牛粪与玉米秸秆混合厌氧发酵性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,2021,50(4):88-95.
[20]	张念瑞,李倩,许曼娟,等. 进料频率对餐厨垃圾与剩余污泥中温共发酵系统稳定性的影响[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(2):638-644.
[21]	周慧敏,姜珺秋,王琨,等. 有机负荷和进料频率对高含固厨余垃圾厌氧消化系统性能的影响[J]. 环境科学学报,2020,40(10):3639-3650.
[21]	王玉峰.垃圾分类后厨余垃圾处理问题及改进措施[J].智能城市,2021,7(4):109-110.
[22]	SAMEENA B, SUDHARSHAN J, GANGAGNI R, et al. Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic methane production potential of acids rich and high-strength landfill leachate at different initial organic loadings and food to inoculum ratios[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,715:136658.
[23]	LI Y, ZHANG Y, KONG X Y, et al. Effects of ammonia on propionate degradation and microbial community in digesters using propionate as a sole carbon source:effects of ammonia on propionate degradation and microbial community[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology,2017,92(10):2538-2545.
[24]	周慧敏. 水平流厌氧消化系统处理高含固厨余垃圾的效能与机制[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2020.
[25]	HU H W, WANG J T, LI J, et al. Field-based evidence for copper contamination induced changes of antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils[J]. Environmental Microbiology,2016,18(11):3896-3909.
[26]	GUO H G, CHEN Q L, HU H W, et al. High-solid anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with lignite promotes methane production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,258:120695.
[27]	ZHANG J Y, WANG Z Y, WANG Y W, et al. Effects of graphene oxide on the performance, microbial community dynamics and antibiotic resistance genes reduction during anaerobic digestion of swine manure[J]. Bioresource Technology,2017,245(Pt A):850-859.