登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON ENERGY AND CARBON EMISSION OF TYPICAL SLUDGE TREATMENT PROJECTS IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES
-
摘要: 中美两国污水处理规模大、碳排放基数高,污泥的处理与处置是污水处理厂碳排放的重要组成部分,合理的污泥管理策略是未来污水厂碳减排的关键。实地调研了中美6个大型典型污水处理厂的污泥处理设施和污泥处置路径,分析了中美两国不同典型的污泥处理处置工艺能量回收和碳排放的表现特征。结果表明:在不考虑碳补偿的情况下,中美6个污水处理厂中,华东A(中温厌氧消化+脱水+填埋/土地利用)、华东B(脱水+填埋/焚烧)、华东C(脱水+焚烧)、Hyperion(高温厌氧消化+脱水+农用)、OCSD(中温厌氧消化+脱水+农用)和Blue plains(热水解+中温厌氧消化+脱水+农用)的污泥处理处置路线的碳足迹分别为1410,1881,1914,471,402,405 kgCO2/t DS。考虑能源回收和资源化利用产生的碳补偿效果,中美6厂污泥处理处置的净碳排放分别为984,1681,1941,-183,-240,-315 kgCO2/t DS。中美6个污水厂碳补偿率分别为30.2%、10.6%、0%、138.9%、159.7%和177.9%。污泥厌氧消化和产物土地资源化利用是碳减排的关键,提升污泥有机质含量能够强化碳补偿效应,该研究结果可为我国污水处理厂低碳转型、污泥处理处置的无害化、减量化和低碳化提供参考。Abstract: China and the United States have large wastewater treatment and high carbon emission scale. The carbon emission from sludge treatment and disposal is an important part of the total carbon emission of sewage treatment plants. A reasonable sludge management strategy is the key to future carbon emission reduction of sewage treatment plants. In this paper, the sludge treatment facilities and paths of six typical wastewater treatment plants in China and the United States were investigated on-site, and the performance characteristics of energy recovery and carbon emission of different typical sludge treatment processes in China and the United States were analyzed. The results showed that, without considering carbon offset, among the six wastewater treatment plants in China and the US, the carbon emission of East China A (mesophilic anaerobic digestion+dewatering+landfill/land use), East China B (dewatering+landfill/incineration), East China C (dewatering+incineration), Hyperion (thermophilic anaerobic digestion+dewatering+agricultural end-use), OCSD (mesophilic anaerobic digestion+dewatering+agriculture end-use) and Blue plains (thermo hydrolysis+mesophilic anaerobic digestion+dewatering+agricultural end-use) were 1410, 1881, 1914, 471, 402, 405 kg CO2/t DS, respectively. Considering the carbon offset effect caused by energy recovery and resource utilization, the net carbon emission from sludge treatment and disposal in the six WWTPs were 984, 1681, 1941, -183, -240, -315 kg CO2/t DS, respectively. The carbon emission offset efficiency of six WWTPs in China and the United States was 30.2%, 10.6%, 0%, 138.9%, 159.7% and 177.9%, respectively. Sludge anaerobic digestion and land utilization of its product were the keys to carbon emission reduction, and increasing the organic matter content of sludge could enhance the carbon offset effect. The research results could provide basis and reference for the low-carbon transformation of WWTPs in China and the harmless, reduced and low-carbon treatment of sludge.
-
[1] LU J Y, WANG X M, LIU H Q, et al. Optimizing operation of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China:the remaining barriers and future implications[J]. Environment International,2019,129:273-278. [2] 住房与城乡建设部.中国城乡建设统计年鉴-2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021. [3] 常纪文,井媛媛,耿瑜,等.推进市政污水处理行业低碳转型,助力碳达峰、碳中和[J].中国环保产业,2021(6):9-17. [4] SHEN Y, LINVILLE J L, URGUN-DEMIRTAS M, et al. An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States:challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015, 50:346-362. [5] 戴晓虎,张辰,章林伟,等.碳中和背景下污泥处理处置与资源化发展方向思考[J].给水排水,2021,57(3):1-5. [6] 宋新新,刘杰,林甲,等.碳中和时代下我国能量自给型污水处理厂发展方向及工程实践[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(4):53-63. [7] 戴晓虎.城镇污水处理厂污泥稳定化处理的必要性和迫切性的思考[J].给水排水,2017,53(12):1-5. [8] YANG G, ZHANG G, WANG H. Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China[J]. Water Research,2015, 78:60-73. [9] US EPA. Types of anaerobic digesters[EB/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/anaerobic-digestion/types-anaerobic-digesters. [10] 赵刚,唐建国,徐竟成.污泥高温厌氧消化工程运行及碳足迹特点案例分析[J].净水技术,2022,41(7):83-89. [11] 陶亚强,李军,CHANG C C. Blue Plains污水处理厂提标改造:后置反硝化、污泥热水解和深层隧道[J].净水技术,2016,35(1):11-15. [12] ZHAO G, LIU W, XU J, et al. Greenhouse gas emission mitigation of large-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs):optimization of sludge treatment and disposal[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,2020, 30(1):955-964. [13] 林文聪,赵刚,刘伟,等.污水厂污泥典型处理处置工艺碳排放核算研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(7):175-179. [14] 张岳,葛铜岗,孙永利,等.基于城镇污水处理全流程环节的碳排放模型研究[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(9):65-74. [15] ZHAO G, GARRIDO M, REIFSNYDER S, et al. Comparative energy and carbon footprint analysis of biosolids management strategies in water resource recovery facilities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 665:762-773. [16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 城镇污水处理厂污泥处置 混合填埋用泥质:GB/T 23485-2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019. [17] 廖足良,冉小珊,刘长青,等.热水解和超声波预处理对污泥厌氧消化效能的影响研究[J].环境工程,2014,32(6):52-56. [18] 王磊,谭学军,王逸贤,等.热水解预处理剩余污泥的有机物分布及厌氧消化特性[J].环境工程,2019,37(3):35-39. [19] GARRIDO-BASERBA M, MOLINOS-SENANTE M, ABELLEIRA-PEREIRA J M, et al. Selecting sewage sludge treatment alternatives in modern wastewater treatment plants using environmental decision support systems[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015, 107:410-419. [20] MATASSA S, BATSTONE D J, HUELSEN T, et al. Can direct conversion of used nitrogen to new feed and protein help feed the world?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2015, 49(9):5247-5254. 期刊类型引用(15)
1. 王航，王先恺，陈祥，李锟，乔雪园，刘枫，董滨. 城市有机固体废弃物协同处置碳排放分析. 环境工程. 2024(02): 66-72 . 
本站查看2. 赵水钎，段妮娜，谭学军，张辰. 城镇污泥“厌氧消化+土地利用”技术路线经济性分析. 环境工程. 2024(02): 1-9 . 本站查看3. 李丽萍，颜蓓蓓，王智，孙昱楠，李宁，陶俊宇，王媛，陈冠益. 污泥脱水技术研究进展及碳排放比较分析. 中国环境科学. 2024(06): 3259-3269 . 百度学术4. 姚大伟，张建新，张荣兵，石磊，葛勇涛，于丽昕，白宇，张文超，刘达克，李长会. 北京市某大型水务集团碳中和规划与实践. 中国给水排水. 2024(14): 19-24 . 百度学术5. 侯毛宇，唐霞，李鹏飞，冯新，刘俊，李碧清，王伟国，罗业燊，林学然. 污泥制园林绿化基质及工艺参数影响研究. 中国无机分析化学. 2024(10): 1443-1451 . 百度学术6. 甄娟，毕永伟，袁华洁. “双碳”战略下污泥热干化技术对比研究. 工业水处理. 2024(10): 215-221 . 百度学术7. 刘跃廷，张强，蒋晓辉，姬亚军，原晓红，谢文豪，郑烈龙，罗嘉昕. 西安市城镇污水系统碳排放时空特征及其主要驱动因素. 环境工程. 2024(11): 40-49 . 本站查看8. 潘煜，李廉明，宋焜，王怡弘，龚俊，李凯，黄群星. 基于化石碳的污泥干化焚烧处置碳排放分析. 环境工程学报. 2023(03): 990-1000 . 百度学术9. 赵刚，蒋明，魏源源，王聪，唐建国. 城镇污水处理厂有机质能量及转化浅析. 广东化工. 2023(12): 156-158+155 . 百度学术10. 郑轶丽，马军，魏婷，王盼盼，熊文兰，游罗丹. 城市水务系统碳排放测算及减碳对策分析：以成都市为例. 环境工程学报. 2023(06): 1778-1787 . 百度学术11. 李建园，孙昱楠，黄佳乐，陈奇晶，贾悦，高豫乐，程占军，颜蓓蓓，陈冠益. 废弃生物降解塑料不同处置技术碳排放分析. 环境工程. 2023(09): 124-132 . 本站查看12. 刘超，张学萌，陈闯，殷玥，黄海宁，陈银广. 厌氧消化过程氨抑制的生物学机理. 环境工程. 2023(09): 156-165 . 本站查看13. 陈惠鑫，旷森楠，陈昕悦，李新宇，郑祥，程荣，石磊. 基于多目标优化的污水处理厂减污降碳协同路径研究：以北京市某厂为例. 环境科学研究. 2023(11): 2148-2158 . 百度学术14. 张楠，孟祥瑞. 城市污水处理厂污泥处理处置碳排放分析——以淮南市为例. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 83-93 . 百度学术15. 尹严，包卫星，卢汉青，张智勇，车博文，潘振华，林旭辉. 天山胜利隧道隧址区污水处理全过程碳排放特征和碳减排模式研究. 现代隧道技术. 2023(06): 58-67 . 百度学术其他类型引用(6)
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 232
- HTML全文浏览量: 68
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 21
下载:
