填埋场好氧修复过程碳排放特征及削减研究

张可; 龙吉生; 刘义行; 王湘徽; 楼紫阳

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202212003

填埋场好氧修复过程碳排放特征及削减研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212003

1. 上海电力大学环境化学与工程学院, 上海 201306;
2. 上海康恒环境修复有限公司, 上海 201703;
3. 上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 200241

基金项目:

污染场地土壤—地下水系统中重金属迁移扩散与预测(2018YFC1800601)

国家自然科学基金(42077111)

详细信息

作者简介:
张可(1997-),男,硕士,主要从事生活垃圾填埋场温室气体排放核算及削减方面的研究工作。zhangk526164119@163.com

通讯作者:
龙吉生(1966-),男,博士,主要从事固废处理和垃圾焚烧方面的研究工作。long@shjec.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 207
- HTML全文浏览量: 47
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-08
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-23

CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND REDUCTION FROM LANDFILL THROUGH FORCED AEROBIC STABILIZATION PROCESS

1. College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Electric Power University, Shanghai 201306, China;
2. SUS Environment, Shanghai 201703, China;
3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200241, China

摘要

摘要: 填埋场是温室气体的主要人为排放源之一。由于历史原因我国目前存在着大量到期填埋场及非正规堆场,面临着严峻的存量垃圾问题,亟需进行修复,而好氧修复技术因其能够有效加速垃圾稳定化而得到了广泛应用,但修复过程中其碳排放特征尚且未知。因此,以某大型垃圾填埋场为对象,考察其在不同的修复状态下,填埋场有机质垃圾和二次污染物的变化特征,揭示其在好氧修复下的稳定化进程,并核算该过程中的甲烷(CH₄)减排效果。结果表明:该填埋场在曝气量和注水量分别为322.34 m³/min及25.65 m³/d的操作状态下,通过间歇注气方法(注气3 h,停3 h,每日运行9 h),垃圾中有机质平均含量从47.66%降至17.86%;填埋气CH₄含量从0.02%~46.48%下降至4.23%,满足导气管排放口CH₄浓度<5%的要求;渗滤液中ρ(COD)、ρ(氨氮)及ρ(总氮)分别降低至800.8,680.9,897.8 mg/L;在修复过程中,该填埋场CH₄实际排放量从24.57 t降低至2.47 t,减少了22.10 t CH₄排放,同时由于填埋场稳定化的加速,其CH₄排放潜力减少了1.75 kg/t垃圾。该研究成果中好氧修复可做为填埋场CH₄减排的重要支撑。
- 碳减排 /
- 填埋场 /
- 好氧修复 /
- CH₄减排
Abstract: Landfill is one of the main anthropogenic emission sources of greenhouse gases. Due to historical reasons, there are a large number of expired landfills and informal storage yards in China facing a severe problem of waste stock that needs to repair urgently. Aerobic remediation technology has been widely used because it can effectively accelerate waste stabilization, but its carbon emission characteristics in the remediation process are still not clear. Taking a large-scale landfill as the object, this paper investigated the change characteristics of landfill organic waste and secondary pollutants under different repairing states, revealed its stabilization process under aerobic repair, and calculated the effect of methane emission reduction in this process. The results showed that under the aeration and water injection of 322.34 m³/min and 25.65 m³/d respectively, by intermittent gas injection method (opening for 3 hours and stopping for 3 hours, running for 9 hours per day), the content of organic matter in garbage decreased from 47.66% to 17.86%; the proportion of methane in landfill gas decreased from 0.02%~46.48% to 4.23%, reaching the requirement that the methane concentration at the outlet of air duct was less than 5%; the concentrations of COD, ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen in leachate decreased to 800.8 mg/L, 680.9 mg/L and 897.8 mg/L respectively; during the restoration process, the actual methane emission of the landfill was reduced from 24.57 tons to 2.47 tons, cut by 22.10 tons. At the same time, due to the acceleration of the stabilization of the landfill, its methane emission potential was reduced by 1.75 kg/t waste. In conclusion, aerobic remediation could provide important support for methane emission reduction in landfill sites.
- carbon emission reduction /
- landfill /
- aerobic repair /
- methane emission reduction

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	姜龙雨, 徐亦迅. 垃圾填埋场的设计与防渗处理技术研究[J]. 城市建设理论研究:电子版, 2016, 6(7):1414-1415.
[2]	中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2021.
[3]	马先芮, 胡佳晨, 王欢, 等. 好氧生物治理技术在瑞安东山垃圾填埋场治理中的应用[J]. 广东化工, 2019, 46(13):157-159.
[4]	王晓琳, 曹爱新, 周传斌,等. 垃圾填埋场CH₄氧化菌及CH₄减排的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(5):16-25.
[5]	UNEP&CCAC. Global Methane Assessment:Benefits and Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions[R]. 2021.
[6]	冯俊熙, 陈多福. 垃圾填埋场CH₄排放监测方法研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(3):174-179.
[7]	高庆先, 杜吴鹏, 卢士庆, 等. 中国城市固体废弃物CH₄排放研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2006, 2(6):269-272.
[8]	HÖGLUND-ISAKSSON L, GÓMEZ-SANABRIA A, KLIMONT Z, et al. Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe-results from the GAINS model[J]. Environmental Research Communications, 2020, 2(2):1-21.
[9]	李黎杰, 田辉, 颜廷山,等. 好氧治理技术在非正规垃圾填埋场处置中的应用[J]. 广东化工, 2015, 42(2):102-103.
[10]	PRANTL R, TESAR M, HUBER-HUMER M, et al. Changes in carbon and nitrogen pool during in-situ aeration of old landfills under varying conditions[J]. Waste Management, 2006, 26(4):373-380.
[11]	COSSU R, RAGA R. Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste[J]. Waste Management, 2008, 28(2):381-388.
[12]	SANG N N, SODA S, SEI K, et al. Effect of aeration on stabilization of organic solid waste and microbial population dynamics in lab-scale landfill bioreactors[J]. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2008, 106(5):425-432.
[13]	付春霞. 好氧生物反应器填埋场曝气频率的研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2014.
[14]	刘军, 潘天骐. 填埋场好氧修复技术研究进展[J]. 广东化工, 2019, 46(20):85-86.
[15]	张均龙. 老垃圾填埋场好氧修复试验及数值模拟[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2019.
[16]	IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006.
[17]	蔡博峰. 中国垃圾填埋场2012年CH₄排放特征研究[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(2):1-4.
[18]	CAI B, LOU Z, WANG J, et al. CH₄ mitigation potentials from China landfills and related environmental co-benefits[J]. Science Advances, 2018, 4(7):eaar8400.
[19]	唐嵘. 封场非正规垃圾填埋场好氧降解快速稳定技术及应用研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2012.
[20]	张浩. "老龄"垃圾渗滤液水质特性及吸附预处理[D]. 天津:天津城市建设学院, 2009.