餐厨垃圾固渣DANO动态堆肥处理效果研究

屈阳; 朱卫兵; 常燕青; 吴元; 彭明国; 顾晓涛; 孙荣

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202212007

餐厨垃圾固渣DANO动态堆肥处理效果研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212007

1. 维尔利环保科技集团股份有限公司, 江苏常州 213125;
2. 常州大学环境与安全工程学院, 江苏常州 213164

基金项目:

江苏省科技成果转化专项资金(BA2020035)

国家重点研发计划子课题(2018YFC190120503)

详细信息

作者简介:
屈阳(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事固废资源化处理及研发工作。quyang@wellegroup.com

通讯作者:
屈阳(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事固废资源化处理及研发工作。quyang@wellegroup.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 199
- HTML全文浏览量: 30
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-30
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-23

A PILOT-SCALE TEST OF DANO DYNAMIC COMPOSTING OF SOLID RESIDUE FROM FOOD WASTE

1. Welle Environmental Group Co., Ltd, Changzhou 213125, China;
2. School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China

摘要

摘要: 分别采用中试规模的达诺滚筒(DANO)动态堆肥和静态发酵作为一、二次发酵工艺主体设备,为实际工程产生的餐厨固渣探究较适宜的参数控制条件。根据不同调理剂(木屑、稻草)、C/N和含水率参数。设置M1、M2、D1、D2和D3共计5个堆肥批次,通过理化指标、氨气挥发量、氧气含量、纤维素酶和蛋白酶含量等指标检测和最终肥料品质指标分析,揭示不同条件下餐厨固渣DANO动态堆肥处理效果。结果表明:1)环境温度在18.5~25.8 ℃,DANO一次发酵升温受环境影响较弱。木屑相较稻草总体上呈现升温速度慢、峰值温度高、堆肥持续时间长的特点。2)控制含水率为50.83%~60.30%,稻草堆体高温期温度都超过55 ℃,维持时间超过7 d。3)稻草堆体初始C/N控制在23~27内较为合理。综上,控制相关条件,堆肥周期可以控制在28~33 d。最终产品的C/N、含水率、总养分和pH等相关重要指标均符合NY/T 525—2021《有机肥料》标准的要求。
- 餐厨垃圾 /
- DANO /
- 堆肥 /
- 肥效 /
- 氮素损失
Abstract: The pilot-scale DANO and static fermentation were used as the main equipment of the primary and secondary fermentation process, respectively, and the appropriate control parameters were explored for the kitchen solid slag produced in the actual project. According to conditioners, C/N and moisture content, five batches of M1, M2, D1, D2 and D3 were set. Physicochemical indexes, ammonia volatilization, oxygen content, cellulase and protease content and final fertilizer quality indexes were detected to reveal the effect of DANO dynamic composting of kitchen solid residues under different conditions. The results showed that: 1) when the environmental temperature was in the range of 18.5 to 25.8 ℃, the temperature rise of the primary fermentation process of DANO was less affected by the environment. Compared with straw, sawdust had the characteristics of a slow heating rate, high peak temperature and long composting duration; 2) when the moisture content was controlled to be 50% to 60%, the temperature of the straw pile body in the high-temperature period was more than 55 ℃, and the maintenance time was longer than 7 days; 3) it was reasonable to control the initial C/N of the straw pile in the range of 23 to 27. To sum up, the composting cycle could be controlled in the range of 28 to 33 days by controlling the relevant conditions. Relevant important indexes including final product C/N, moisture content, total nutrient and pH all met the requirements of China’s Field Standard Organic Fertilizer (NY/T 525—2021)
- food waste /
- DANO /
- composting /
- fertilizer efficiency /
- nitrogen loss

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

[1]	施军营,薛方亮,DODA A,等.城市餐厨垃圾前处理的工艺优化[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(10):5658-5662.
[2]	KENG Z X,CHONGS,NGCG,et al.Community-scale composting for food waste:a life-cycle assessment-supported case study[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,261:121220.
[3]	张虹, 李蕾, 彭韵, 等. 氨氮对餐厨垃圾厌氧消化性能及微生物群落的影响[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(8):3465-3474.
[4]	袁京,张地方,李赟,等.外加碳源对厨余垃圾生物干化效果的影响[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(2):628-635.
[5]	薛晶晶,李彦明,常瑞雪,等.厨余与园林废物共堆肥过程氮素转化及损失[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(10):192-197.
[6]	宋彩红,齐辉,魏自民,等.耐热复合菌系强化全程高温堆肥快速处理餐厨垃圾[J].环境工程,2021,39(5):111-117.
[7]	詹亚斌,魏雨泉,林永锋,等.通风模式对餐厨垃圾生物干化能效及氮素损失的影响[J].环境工程,2021,39(5):124-130.
[8]	杨延梅,席北斗,刘洪亮,等.餐厨垃圾堆肥理化特性变化规律研究[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(2):72-77.
[9]	聂永丰.固体废物处理工程技术手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2013.
[10]	张玉冬,张红玉,顾军,等. 通风量对厨余垃圾堆肥过程中H₂S和NH₃排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2015,34(7):1371-1377.
[11]	关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1983.
[12]	翟红,张衍林,艾平,等.不同初始含水率对沼渣和秸秆混合堆肥过程的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(21):4357-4360.
[13]	韩涛,任连海,张相锋,等.初始环境温度对餐厨垃圾好氧堆肥过程的影响[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(9):1458-1462.
[14]	王蕊,邰俊,赵由才,等.餐厨垃圾资源化衍生品的堆肥中试实验[J].环境工程学报,2021,15(9):3012-3019.
[15]	李小建,周振鹏,谢锡龙,等.餐厨垃圾连续堆肥处理系统中试研究[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(1):340-344.
[16]	陈冠益.餐厨垃圾废物资源综合利用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2018.
[17]	赵天涛.固体废物堆肥原理与技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2017.
[18]	牛俊玲,郑宾国,梁丽珍.餐厨垃圾堆肥过程中水解酶活性变化的研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(11):284-288.
[19]	GODWIN C M, WHITAKER E A, COTNER J B. Growth rate and resource imbalance interactively control biomass stoichiometry and elemental quotas of aquatic bacteria[J]. Ecology, 2017, 98(3):820-829.
[20]	PAREDES C, ROIG A, BERNAL M P, et al. Evolution of organic matter and nitrogen during co-composting of olive mill wastewater with solid organic wastes[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000, 11(11):6235-6248.
[21]	朴哲,崔宗林,苏宝林,等.高温堆肥的生物化学变化特征及植物抑制物质的降解规律[J].农业环境保护,2001,20(4):206-209.
[22]	郭倩倩,吴拥军,韩丽珍,等.餐厨垃圾自然升温堆肥工艺研究[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(7):2705-2710.
[23]	齐凯佳.不同通风量对污泥生物干化效果的影响[J].山西建筑,2011,37(6):102-105.
[24]	BERNAL M P, ALBURQUERQUE J A, MORAL R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment:a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(22):5444-5453.
[25]	WANG X, SELVAM A, WONG J W C. Influence of lime on struvite formation and nitrogen conservation during food waste composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 217:227-232.
[26]	王洪涛.农村固体废物处理处置与资源化技术[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[27]	解开治,徐培智,张发宝,等.接种微生物菌剂对猪粪堆肥过程中细菌群落多样性的影响[J].应用生态学学报,2009,20(8):2012-2018.
[28]	解开治,徐培智,张仁陆,等.一种腐熟促进剂配合微生物腐熟剂对鲜牛粪堆肥的效应研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(3):1142-1146.
[29]	文昊深,彭绪亚.重庆城市生活垃圾高温好氧堆肥试验研究[J].四川建筑,2004,24(5):84-86.