不同电解质对电化学预处理剩余污泥厌氧发酵产挥发性脂肪酸的影响

董鑫磊; 林青山; 林亚楠; 习诗浩; 程伯夷; 陈磊; 张达; 王宗平; 郭刚

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202212010

不同电解质对电化学预处理剩余污泥厌氧发酵产挥发性脂肪酸的影响

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212010

1. 华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院, 武汉 430074;
2. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司, 武汉 430063

基金项目:

湖北省自然科学基金(2020CFB403)

国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1904005)

国家自然科学基金(52100040)

详细信息

作者简介:
董鑫磊(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为污泥处理及资源化。1909535582@qq.com

通讯作者:
郭刚(1987-),男,副教授,主要研究方向为含硫废水、污泥处理及资源化。ceguogang@hust.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 263
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-19
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-23

EFFECTS OF ELECTROLYTES ON ACIDOGENIC FERMENTATION OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS PRODUCTION VIA ELECTROCHEMICAL PRETREATMENT

1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology School of Environment Science & Engineering, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430074, China

摘要

摘要: 电化学预处理剩余污泥(waste activated sludge, WAS)厌氧发酵(anaerobic fermentation, AF)产挥发性脂肪酸(volatile fatty acids, VFAs)具有良好的应用价值和环境效益,然而不同电解质对电化学预处理剩余污泥以及厌氧发酵的效果具有较大影响。因此,实验考查了不同电解质(空白对照,NaCl,Na₂SO₄和CaCl₂)在电流强度为1 A、预处理时间为60 min的电化学处理条件下,对剩余污泥厌氧发酵产VFAs的影响。结果表明:当0.05 mol/L NaCl作为电解质时,在电化学预处理阶段污泥有机质(溶解性COD、多糖、蛋白质等)溶出效果较其他电解质更好。在厌氧发酵阶段,该条件下VFAs最大累积量可达到2625.8 mg COD/L,相比空白对照组提升了51.6%,表明NaCl作为电解质的电化学预处理不仅能够有效促进剩余污泥中有机质溶出,而且有利于产酸微生物(如Firmicutes和Bacteroidetes)的富集,从而促进厌氧发酵产VFAs,达到提高污泥资源化利用率的目的。
- 电化学预处理 /
- 厌氧发酵 /
- 挥发性脂肪酸 /
- 剩余污泥
Abstract: Anaerobic fermentation (AF) of waste activated sludge (WAS) via electrochemical pretreatment (EPT) is a practical, effective and cost-saving protocol for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production. However, AF performance is significantly affected by the different electrolytes during EPT. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different types of electrolytes (Control, NaCl, Na₂SO₄ and CaCl₂) on VFAs production from AF of WAS via EPT with a current intensity at 1 A for 60 min. The results showed that by using 0.05 mol/L NaCl as the electrolyte during EPT, the amount of organic matter released from WAS, such as soluble COD, glycogen, protein etc., was the highest compared to other electrolytes. Thus the maximal VFAs accumulation during AF via EPT by using NaCl as the electrolyte reached 2625.8 mg COD/L, which was 51.6% higher than that of the control. These results indicated that EPT with NaCl as the electrolyte could effectively improve the hydrolysis of WAS, increase the amount of organic matter released from WAS and promote the enrichment of anaerobic fermentative bacteria (such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes). All of these subsequently promoted the AF of WAS and thus increased VFAs production, which in turn enhanced the resource recovery from WAS treatment.
- electrochemical pretreatment /
- anaerobic fermentation /
- volatile fatty acid /
- waste activated sludge

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	SEGGIANI M, VITOLO S, PUCCINI M, et al. Cogasification of sewage sludge in an updraft gasifier[J]. Fuel, 2012,93:486-491.
[2]	刘鑫, 惠秀娟, 唐凤德. 我国典型城市污泥产生量处理处置现状及经济学趋势分析[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2021,41(4):88-93.
[3]	LIANG T, ELMAADAWY K, LIU B, et al. Anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge for volatile fatty acid production:recent updates of pretreatment methods and the potential effect of humic and nutrients substances[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021,145:321-339.
[4]	刘长青, 薛珊, 金秋燕, 等. 餐厨垃圾与市政污泥混合比对共厌氧消化性能的影响[J]. 中国沼气, 2018,36(2):48-51.
[5]	魏玉莲, 叶京, 杨玮晴, 等. 热、碱预处理对厨余垃圾厌氧发酵产挥发性脂肪酸的影响[J]. 广东化工, 2021,48(15):183-185.
[6]	柯壹红, 曾艺芳, 李华藩, 等. 不同预处理方法对污泥厌氧发酵产酸效果的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2020,38(8):21-26.
[7]	章涛. 超声波预处理耦合技术改善污泥厌氧发酵产酸的研究[D]. 苏州:苏州科技学院, 2015.
[8]	王羚. 化学预处理对微生物电解促进污泥厌氧发酵工艺影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
[9]	李宵宵, 吴丽杰, 任瑞鹏, 等. 高含固污泥厌氧消化处理技术研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2020,40(8):21-25.
[10]	何永全, 曾祖刚, 黄安寿. 餐厨垃圾和市政污泥联合高温厌氧消化产沼气研究[J]. 四川环境, 2018,37(3):28-32.
[11]	任贺. 剩余污泥的电解预处理效能研究[D]. 长春:吉林建筑大学, 2014.
[12]	毛彦俊. 剩余污泥电化学含氯漂白技术研究[D]. 大连:大连交通大学, 2012.
[13]	ZHANG D, JIANG H, CHANG J, et al. Effect of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on volatile fatty acids production in sludge acidification and subsequent polyhydroxyalkanoates production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,279:99-102.
[14]	隋志男, 郅二铨, 姚杰, 等. 三维荧光光谱区域积分法解析辽河七星湿地水体DOM组成及来源[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2015,5(2):114-120.
[15]	MASIHI H, BADALIANS GHOLIKANDI G. Employing Electrochemical-Fenton process for conditioning and dewatering of anaerobically digested sludge:a novel approach[J]. Water Research, 2018,144:373-382.
[16]	H L O, J R N, L F A, et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1951,193(1):265-75.
[17]	DUBOIS M, GILLES K, HAMILTON J K, et al. A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars[J]. Nature, 1951,168:167.
[18]	宋亚梦, 卢静芳, 苑宏英, 等. 含氯氧化剂对污泥水解性能的影响研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018,41(10):82-86.
[19]	CHEN W, WESTERHOFF P, LEENHEER J A, et al. Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003,37(24):5701-5710.
[20]	WU J, YANG Q, LUO W, et al. Role of free nitrous acid in the pretreatment of waste activated sludge:extracellular polymeric substances disruption or cells lysis?[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,336:28-37.
[21]	ERKAN H S, ENGIN G O. A comparative study of waste activated sludge disintegration by electrochemical pretreatment process combined with hydroxyl and sulfate radical based oxidants[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020,8(4).
[22]	尹利鹏. 剩余活性污泥快速降解及产酸研究[D]. 阜新:辽宁工程技术大学, 2019.
[23]	ZHEN G, LU X, LI Y, et al. Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,128:93-102.
[24]	叶彩虹. 电化学预处理改善污泥厌氧消化性能的研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2017.
[25]	XU Y, ZHENG L, GENG H, et al. Enhancing acidogenic fermentation of waste activated sludge via isoelectric-point pretreatment:Insights from physical structure and interfacial thermodynamics[J]. Water Research, 2020,185:116237.
[26]	李冬娜, 马晓军. 污泥厌氧发酵产酸机理及应用研究进展[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020,54(2):51-60.
[27]	XIAONAN Z, YU L, LIU H, et al. Effect of pH on volatile fatty acid production and the microbial community during anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021,336:125338.
[28]	BENYAN L, ZIYUAN X, MIN G, et al. Production of volatile fatty acid from fruit waste by anaerobic digestion at high organic loading rates:performance and microbial community characteristics[J]. Bioresource technology, 2021,346:126448.
[29]	XING B, HAN Y, WANG X C, et al. Persistent action of cow rumen microorganisms in enhancing biodegradation of wheat straw by rumen fermentation[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020,715:136529.
[30]	郝晓地, 陈峤, 刘然彬. Tetrasphaera聚磷菌研究进展及其除磷能力辨析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020,40(3):741-753.
[31]	JINSONG L, HAIBO Z, PANYUE Z, et al. Effect of substrate load on anaerobic fermentation of rice straw with rumen liquid as inoculum:hydrolysis and acidogenesis efficiency, enzymatic activities and rumen bacterial community structure[J]. Waste Management, 2021,124:235-245.
[32]	梁英. 炼厂剩余活性污泥的水解酸化实验研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
[33]	WATERS J L, LEY R E. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health[J]. BMC Biology, 2019,17(1):88.
[34]	LAWSON PAUL A. 梭菌属分类研究进展:现状和展望(英文)[J]. 微生物学通报, 2016,43(5):1070-1074.