DISCHARGE LAW OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATER AND POLLUTANTS DISCHARGE OF URBAN RESIDENTS IN SOUTH CHINA
-
摘要: 为调查华南地区居民生活排污情况及地块内部水质变化情况,选取南宁市3个代表性生活小区进行楼宇污水管和出水口的全天水质水量监测。结果表明:居民全天水量峰期为7:00—9:00、11:00—13:00及20:00—23:00,水质峰期为6:00—9:00、11:00—13:00及18:00—21:00;排污规律与居民生活小区特性相关,生活污水中氮、磷污染物高度同源,80%以上来源于人体排泄,洗涤剂含量与磷化合物浓度并不呈相关性;经过化粪池后污水水质仍存在衰减,化粪池后每1 km的污水管道污水COD可削减34 mg/L,削减率为11.7%;以楼宇污水管水质和人均日生活用水量计算出3个小区居民COD、NH3-N、TN、TP、BOD5、LAS人均生活排污系数分别为52.2,7.1,8.7,0.61,25.4,0.49 g/(人·d)。
-
关键词:
- 楼宇污水管 /
- 排污规律 /
- 水质削减 /
- 人均生活污染物排放量
Abstract: In order to investigate the domestic life sewage discharge situation of urban residents in South China and the change of water quality inside the plot, taking Nanning as an example, three representative living quarters were selected to monitor the water quality and quantity of the building sewage pipes and outlets throughout the day. The results showed that the peak period of water volume throughout the day was 7:00—9:00, 11:00—13:00, and 20:00—23:00, and the peak period of water quality throughout the day was 6:00—9:00, 11:00—13:00 and 18:00—21:00, sewage pollutants discharge was closely related to the characteristics of residential communities. Nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants in domestic sewage were highly homologous, more than 80% of which come from human excretion. There was no correlation between detergent content and phosphorus compounds’ concentration. After the septic tank, the water quality was still attenuating. After the septic tank, the COD of every 1 km sewage pipeline could be reduced by 34 mg/L, and the reduction rate was 11.7%. Based on the water quality of building sewage pipes and daily water consumption per capita, the per capita domestic sewage discharge coefficient of COD, NH3-N, TN, TP, BOD5, and LAS of the selected urban residents was 52.2, 7.1, 8.7, 0.61, 25.4, 0.49 g/(p·d), respectively. -
[1] 张维, 孙永利, 郑兴灿, 等. 城镇居民生活污水污染物产生量测定技术难点与启示[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57 (5):52-57. [2] 朱环,李怀正,叶建锋, 等.上海市居民生活用水主要污染物产生系数的研究[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(1):37-41. [3] 蒋松竹, 汪俊妍, 刘秀红, 等. 城镇生活源污水污染物产生系数的研究[J]. 给水排水, 2017, 53(增刊1):86-89. [4] 孙静, 宋兵魁, 王子林, 等. 北方缺水城市城镇居民生活排污系数调查研究:以天津市为例[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2018, 40 (1):112-117. [5] 谢中伟, 袁国林, 赵磊, 等.城市居民小区排污系数估算:以昆明、大理和禄劝为例[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2008,20(2):119-123. [6] 赵海霞, 王淑芬, 崔建鑫, 等. 城镇生活污染排放系数调查与核算:以常州市为例[J].环境科学学报, 2016, 36 (7):2658-2663. [7] 刘爱萍, 刘晓文, 陈中颖, 等. 珠江三角洲地区城镇生活污染源调查及其排污总量核算[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31 (增刊1):53-57. [8] ALIREZA M, SIMIN N, AMIR H M, et al. The estimation of per capita loadings of domestic wastewater in Tehran[J]. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering,2015,13(1):25. [9] 孙永利, 张维, 郑兴灿, 等. 城镇居民人均日生活污水污染物产生量测算之产污规律[J]. 中国给水排水, 2020, 36 (6):1-6. [10] 张岳, 葛铜岗, 孙永利, 等. 基于城镇污水处理全流程环节的碳排放模型研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2021, 37 (9):65-74. [11] 姜文超, 黄常, 刘秋虹, 等. 重庆市住宅用水量现状调查及用水定额研究[J].给水排水, 2019, 55 (2):102-106. [12] 王希越,刘东方,王振东,等. 混凝-AF-BAF组合工艺处理洗浴废水的实验研究[J].水处理技术,2019,45(9):115-119. [13] 吴雪, 张英, 何佳, 等. 滇池流域城市居民家庭生活污水特征研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2021, 37(11):89-95. [14] SARI L, WENDY S, KATARZYNA K R, et al. Effect of temperature on anaerobic treatment of black water in UASB-septic tank systems[J]. Bioresource Technology,2007,98(5):980-986. [15] 魏亮亮, 李健菊, 陈颜, 等. 公共建筑、化粪池设置及管道传输对城市生活污水水质参数的影响分析[J]. 给水排水, 2020, 56(增刊2):155-166. [16] 张怡蕾,操家顺,薛朝霞, 等.城市排水管道内污染物迁移转化规律研究进展[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(1):111-121. [17] 金鹏康,郝晓宇,王宝宝, 等.城市污水管网中水质变化特性[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(3):1009-1014. [18] 丁慧,关华滨,陈志强. 寒冷地区化粪池的效果评价和探讨[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(8):78-82. [19] 包晗,唐颖栋,方刚, 等. 深圳茅洲河流域某污水收集片区外水侵入情况排查与整治[J].给水排水,2021,57(3):74-78. [20] 王湘晋, 许萍, 师林蕊, 等. 城市居民家庭生活用水量及其时空差异性研究[J].给水排水, 2021, 57(7):93-101. [21] 沈盼.南昌市污水处理厂进水浓度偏低原因分析及对策[J].中国市政工程,2012(1):24-25,81. [22] 曹业始, ABEGGLEN Christian, 刘智晓, 等. 改造当前国内污水管网需要综合考虑的四个因素[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57(8):125-137.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 211
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0