IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE
-
摘要: 装修垃圾具有组分多且复杂、垃圾性质波动性大等特点,其处理工艺需结合垃圾来源区域内实地尽调情况确定。以上海市某典型装修垃圾处理项目为例,其工艺路线为"两级破碎+多级分选"。一级筛分单元后实际物料分布与设计物料平衡存在显著性差异,后端分选设备利用率处于较低水平,可实施的工艺改进措施包括物料分流或调整上层筛板规格。改进后,相同规格的3台箱式风选机实际接收处理负荷占比接近,物料分布均匀性趋于合理。经济效益方面,处理线运营成本折算约为114.49元/t,其中人工费、残渣焚烧处置费和残渣填埋处置费占比分别为20.69%、19.22%和14.11%;经营收入折算约为26.45元/t,以再生砖产品和再生骨料出售为主。制砖线运营成本、产品品质受水泥掺比影响显著,其中水泥掺比从10%增加至20%时,再生标砖抗压强度平均值从13.9 MPa增加至18.1 MPa;最优化水泥掺比为15%时,制砖线难以维持收支平衡。装修垃圾处理项目在无政府补贴情况下,项目投资收益和经济效益较低,这是目前该领域发展的主要瓶颈。Abstract: Decoration waste has the characteristics of multiple and complex components and large fluctuation of waste properties. The treatment process should be determined by on-site diligence in the waste source area. Taking a typical decoration waste project in Shanghai as an example, its process route is "two-stage crushing+multi-stage sorting", and there is a significant difference between the actual and the designed material balance after the primary screening unit. The utilization rate of the back-end sorting equipment was at a low level. The practical process improvement measures included material diversion or adjusting the upper sieve plate specification. After the improvement, the proportion of the actual receiving and processing load of the three box-type air separators with the same specification was close, and the material distribution uniformity tended to be reasonable. In terms of economic benefits, the operation cost of the treatment line was converted to about 114.49 yuan/t, of which the labour cost, residue incineration disposal cost and residue landfill disposal cost accounted for 20.69%, 19.22% and 14.11% respectively; the operating income was about 26.45 yuan/t, mainly from the sale of recycled brick products and recycled aggregates. The operation cost and product quality of brick making line were significantly affected by the cement mixing ratio. When the cement mixing ratio increased from 10% to 20%, the average compressive strength of recycled standard bricks increased from 13.9 MPa to 18.1 MPa; when the optimum cement mixing ratio was 15%, it was difficult for the brick making line to maintain the balance of revenue and expenditure. The decoration waste project had low investment income and economic benefit without government support, which is the main bottleneck of the industry development in this field.
-
[1] 段珍华, 黄冬丽, 肖建庄, 等. 建筑装修垃圾成分调研及资源化处置模式探讨[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(10):171-177. [2] 荣玥芳, 张新月, 张典, 等. 基于绿色发展理念的建筑垃圾源头减量规划研究[J]. 北京建筑大学学报, 2022, 38(1):9-17. [3] 张敏, 董莉, 刘景洋, 等. 基于物质流分析的建筑垃圾产生量预测[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(5):869-878. [4] 刘会友. 房屋装修垃圾的危害与处置探究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2005(3):24-27. [5] 于丹凤, 李小月, 段华波, 等. 城市拆除和装修建筑垃圾重金属浸出特性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(1):153-157. [6] 陈天, 何玉安, 魏正康. 装潢建筑垃圾处理现状及其分拣分类处理工艺[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36:199-203. [7] 薛骁. 上海市建筑装修垃圾组分分析与新型建材利用技术[J]. 山东工业技术, 2020(5):112-121. [8] 赵钰, 王巧稚, 卫俊, 等. 基于武汉市房屋竣工面积预测的装修垃圾产生量测算方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2021, 29(2):10-15. [9] 冷发光, 何更新, 张仁瑜, 等. 国内外建筑垃圾资源化现状及发展趋势[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2009, 17(1):33-35. [10] 夏伟东, 陆沈磊. 关于城市装修垃圾现状及处置的思考[J]. 江苏建材, 2018(3):56-58. [11] 郝粼波. 浅析装修垃圾预处理技术应用及其在我国的发展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2020, 28(4):95-98, 104. [12] 汪振双, 孙剑书, 周焱鑫, 等. 建筑垃圾资源化处理PPP项目风险评价指标体系研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2021, 35(3):58-63.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 219
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0