FULVIC ACID SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS DURING COMPOSTING OF BIOLEACHING SLUDGE AND DIFFERENT MATERIALS
-
摘要: 以生物沥浸污泥与不同农林废弃物混合堆肥为研究对象,采用紫外可见光谱(UV-vis)、傅里叶红外光谱(FTIR)和三维荧光光谱(3D-EEMs)技术分析了堆肥过程中富里酸结构、组成和含量变化。基础理化性质表明:4个处理组(T1:污泥+甘蔗渣,T2:污染+秸秆,T3:污染+米糠,T4:污染+木屑)均达到堆肥成熟标准;UV-vis和紫外参数SUVA254、SUVA280的变化表明4个堆肥处理组中的腐熟度和富里酸的芳香碳含量均增加,其中T2处理组的腐熟度优于其他处理组。FTIR分析表明富里酸中多糖类、碳水类和脂肪族物质的含量逐渐降低,合成的腐殖酸类物质含量逐渐增加,T3处理组的腐殖化、芳构化程度要优于其他处理组。3D-EEMs分析表明结构简单、共轭程度低的有机物如辅酶、色素等物质被降解消耗,形成共轭程度高的类腐殖质物质,T2处理组的荧光峰强度最大,表明堆肥腐熟效果更好。富里酸含量变化则表明T3处理组腐熟效果优于其他处理组。结果表明,秸秆和米糠与生物沥浸污泥共同堆肥效果较好。Abstract: Taking the mixed composting of biological leaching sludge and different agricultural and forestry wastes as the research object, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy (3D-EEMs) techniques were used to analyze the changes in structure, composition, and content of fulvic acid in the composting process. The basic physical and chemical properties showed that the four treatment groups (T1: sludge+bagasse; T2: sludge+straw; T3: sludge+rice bran; T4: sludge+sawdust) all reached the compost maturity standard. Changes in UV-vis, and UV parameters SUVA254 and SUVA280 indicated that the fulvic acid maturity and aromatic carbon content increased in the four treatment groups, and the T2 treatment group was better than the other treatment groups. FTIR analysis showed that the content of polysaccharides, carbohydrates, and aliphatic substances in fulvic acid was gradually decreasing, while the content of humic substances was gradually increasing. The degree of humification and aromatization in the T3 treatment group was better than that in the other groups. 3D-EEMs analysis showed that organic substances with a simple structure and low degree of conjugation, such as coenzymes and pigments, were degraded and consumed to form humus-like substances with a high degree of conjugation. The fluorescence peak intensity of the T2 treatment group was the highest, indicating the best composting effect. The change in fulvic acid content showed that the decomposing effect of the T3 treatment group was better than that of other treatment groups. So straw and rice brain were proved to be suitable for mixed composting with bioleaching sludge.
-
Key words:
- bioleached sludge /
- compost /
- UV-vis /
- FTIR /
- 3D-EEMs /
- fulvic acid
-
[1] FAN S Y, LI A R, TER HEIJNE A, et al. Heat potential, generation, recovery and utilization from composting:a review[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 175:105850. [2] NASERIAN E S, CHERAGHI M, LORESTANI B, et al. Qualitative investigation of sewage sludge composting:effect of aerobic/anaerobic pretreatments[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14(10):836. [3] KULIKOWSKA D, SINDREWICZ S. Effect of barley straw and coniferous bark on humification process during sewage sludge composting[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 79:207-213. [4] ZHANG D F, XU Z C, WANG G Y, et al. Insights into characteristics of organic matter during co-biodrying of sewage sludge and kitchen waste under different aeration intensities[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2020, 20:101117. [5] XIONG R W, GAO X F, TU X Y, et al. Heavy metal remediation in sludge compost:recent progress[J]. Journal of Renewable Materials, 2022, 10(2):469-486. [6] ABBASI F, MOKHTARI M, JALILI M. The impact of agricultural and green waste treatments on compost quality of dewatered sludge[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(35):35757-35766. [7] SMITH B A M, EUDOXIE G, STEIN R, et al. Effect of neem leaf inclusion rates on compost physico-chemical, thermal and spectroscopic stability[J]. Waste Management, 2020, 114:136-147. [8] JAIN M S, PAUL S, KALAMDHAD A S. Kinetics and physics during composting of various organic wastes:statistical approach to interpret compost application feasibility[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 255:120324. [9] 胡伟桐, 李喆, 羊鹏程, 等.生物沥浸污泥饼高温堆肥系统工艺设计及运行效果[J]. 给水排水, 2014, 50(7):16-21. [10] 胡伟桐, 余雅琳, 李喆, 等. 不同调理剂对生物沥浸污泥堆肥氮素损失的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(12):2379-2385. [11] ZHANG X, ZHAO Y, MENG H H, et al. Revealing the inner dynamics of fulvic acid from different compost-amended soils through microbial and chemical analyses[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2020, 68(12):3722-3728. [12] ZHANG Z C, ZHAO Y, YANG T X, et al. Effects of exogenous protein-like precursors on humification process during lignocellulose-like biomass composting:amino acids as the key linker to promote humification process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 291:121882. [13] MERLO C, VÁZQUEZ C, IRIARTE A G, et al. Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of humic substances from sediment and riparian soil of a highly polluted urban river (Suquía River, Córdoba, Argentina)[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2020, 35(3):287-294. [14] XIAO X, XI B D, HE X S, et al. Hydrophobicity-dependent electron transfer capacities of dissolved organic matter derived from chicken manure compost[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 222:757-765. [15] HABCHI A, KALLOUM S, BRADAI L. Follow the degradation of organic matter during composting of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) waste by physicochemical properties, UV-visible and FT-IR analysis[J]. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2020,102(12):1-18. [16] ZHU Y C, JIN Y, LIU X S, et al. Insight into interactions of heavy metals with livestock manure compost-derived dissolved organic matter using EEM-PARAFAC and 2D-FTIR-COS analyses[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 420:126532. [17] 廖黎明, 潘家琦, 陈钰, 等.基于EEM与高通量技术分析中药渣投加对餐厨垃圾堆肥的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(1):142-147. [18] GAO X T, TAN W B, ZHAO Y, et al. Diversity in the mechanisms of humin formation during composting with different materials[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(7):3653-3662. [19] 张强, 席北斗, 杨津津, 等.不同物料堆肥富里酸的结构特征的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2):763-770. [20] HUANG W F, LI Y M, LIU X M, et al. Linking the electron transfer capacity with the compositional characteristics of dissolved organic matter during hyperthermophilic composting[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 755:142687. [21] 文欣, 赵越, 时俭红, 等.多元统计分析研究不同物料堆肥富里酸紫外吸收光谱特性[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(3):1814-1818. [22] 李文圣, 王旭东.猪粪和牛粪与秸秆配合堆腐过程中腐殖物质的变化特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(4):541-544. [23] WANG G Y, YANG Y, KONG Y L, et al. Key factors affecting seed germination in phytotoxicity tests during sheep manure composting with carbon additives[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021,421:126809. [24] LI H H, ZHANG T, TSANG D C W, et al. Effects of external additives:biochar, bentonite, phosphate, on co-composting for swine manure and corn straw[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 248:125927. [25] CHUNG W J, CHANG S W, CHAUDHARY D K, et al. Effect of biochar amendment on compost quality, gaseous emissions and pathogen reduction during in-vessel composting of chicken manure[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 283:131129. [26] YANG Y J, DU W, CUI Z Y, et al. Spectroscopic characteristics of dissolved organic matter during pig manure composting with bean dregs and biochar amendments[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2020, 158:105226. [27] ZITTEL R, DA SILVA C P, DOMINGUES C E, et al. Composting of smuggled cigarettes tobacco and industrial sewage sludge in reactors:physicochemical, phytotoxic and spectroscopic study[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 79:537-544. [28] XU Z C, LI G X, HUDA N, et al. Effects of moisture and carbon/nitrogen ratio on gaseous emissions and maturity during direct composting of cornstalks used for filtration of anaerobically digested manure centrate[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 298:122503. [29] LI S Y, LI J J, SHI L H, et al. Role of phosphorous additives on nitrogen conservation and maturity during pig manure composting[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(14):17981-17991. [30] 毛宇翔, 李涵, 职音, 等.城市污泥好氧堆肥过程中DOM的光谱动态变化特征[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(2):794-803. [31] 赵越, 魏雨泉, 李洋, 等.不同物料堆肥腐熟程度的紫外-可见光谱特性表征[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(4):961-965. [32] ZHU Q H, LI G, JIANG Z W, et al. Investigating the variation of dissolved organic matters and the evolution of autotrophic microbial community in composting with organic and inorganic carbon sources[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 304:123013. [33] HUSSAIN N, ABBASI T, ABBASI S A. Toxic and allelopathic ipomoea yields plant-friendly organic fertilizer[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148:826-835. [34] SONG C H, LI M X, XI B D, et al. Characterisation of dissolved organic matter extracted from the bio-oxidative phase of co-composting of biogas residues and livestock manure using spectroscopic techniques[J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2015, 103:38-50. [35] 董利超, 王晓霞, 马力通, 等.褐煤添加对羊粪有机肥发酵过程中水溶性有机物光谱学变化特征的影响[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(11):3579-3584. [36] REN X N, WANG Q, LI R H, et al. Effect of clay on greenhouse gas emissions and humification during pig manure composting as supported by spectroscopic evidence[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 737:139712. [37] HE X S, XI B D, CUI D Y, et al. Influence of chemical and structural evolution of dissolved organic matter on electron transfer capacity during composting[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 268:256-263. [38] WEI Z M, ZHAO X Y, ZHU C W, et al. Assessment of humification degree of dissolved organic matter from different composts using fluorescence spectroscopy technology[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 95:261-267. [39] 李波,叶菁,刘岑薇,等.生物炭添加对猪粪堆肥过程碳素转化与损失的影响[J].环境科学学报, 2017, 37(9):3511-3518. [40] 赵秀云, 赵昕宇, 杨津津, 等.堆肥过程中木质素的降解机理及影响因素研究进展[J].环境工程, 2021, 39(6):128-136.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 125
- HTML全文浏览量: 25
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0