生活垃圾持续回灌纳滤浓缩液的产气与水质变化

杨一清; 张宇翔; 张玉飞; 李耀晃; 吴明宇; 张楠; 陈晓强

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202303020

生活垃圾持续回灌纳滤浓缩液的产气与水质变化

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303020

杨一清¹,
张宇翔^2,3, ,,
张玉飞⁴,
李耀晃⁴,
吴明宇⁴,
张楠⁴,
陈晓强⁴

1. 广州环保投资集团有限公司, 广州 510030;
2. 浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室, 杭州 310058;
3. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所, 杭州 310058;
4. 广州环投环境服务有限公司, 广州 514000

基金项目:

广东省住房和城乡建设厅科技计划项目"生活垃圾卫生填埋场填埋气可持续利用项目"(2020-k27-46433)

详细信息

作者简介:
杨一清(1965-),男,主要研究方向为生活垃圾的处理与处置。yangyiqing@gzepi.com.cn

通讯作者:
张宇翔(1993-),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为生活垃圾的有机废液回灌及降解产气。11912040@zju.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 48
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-29
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-26
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-01

GAS PRODUCTION AND LEACHATE PROPERTIES OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE WITH CONTINUOUS INJECTION OF CONCENTRATED NF LEACHATE

1. Guangzhou Environmental Protection Investment Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510030, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geo-environmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
4. GZEPI Environmental Service Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 514000, China

摘要

摘要: 膜处理技术已成为大多数填埋场处理渗滤液的常用方法,过滤后产生的浓缩液通常采用回灌法进行处置。虽然回灌法投资少、操作方便、运行费用低,但浓缩液高盐低生化性的特点可能导致在回灌后对垃圾的产气和渗滤液水质产生负面影响。通过模拟生化反应器,将纳滤浓缩液周期性回灌至由实际填埋场采集的高、低有机质垃圾样本中,监测甲烷产量、臭气浓度以及渗滤液水质。结果表明:相比清水对照组,回灌浓缩液对产甲烷过程具有抑制效果,且对低有机质含量垃圾的抑制比高有机质垃圾更强;回灌浓缩液后NH₃和H₂S的释放量变大,主要在快速产甲烷阶段和产甲烷衰减阶段释放;随着浓缩液回灌次数的增加,COD、BOD₅、NH₃-N、TN、动植物油呈现较好的去除效果,但出水盐浓度将持续上升并超过浓缩液本身。
- 浓缩液 /
- 生活垃圾 /
- 回灌 /
- 甲烷 /
- 臭气 /
- 盐浓度
Abstract: For most landfills, membrane filtration has become a common method for leachate treatment. The filtered concentrated leachate is usually recirculated back to the landfill for such operation is convenient, of low investment and running cost. However, concentrated leachate has characteristics of high salt and poor degradability, which might affect landfill gas production and the effluent quality of leachate after injection. In this study, the nanofiltration concentrate was periodically reinjected into simulating bioreactors filled with waste samples of high/low organic content collected from the landfill site. And then the methanogenesis, odor gas and leachate quality were monitored. The experimental results showed that compared with the injection of water (blank and control), the reinjection of concentrated liquid had an inhibitory effect on methanogenesis process, and the inhibition for low organic waste was stronger. After the injection of the concentrated leachate, the release of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide became stronger. The odor gases were mainly released in rapid methanogenesis phase and the methanogenic attenuation phase. With the increase of the reinjection cycles, the reinjection of concentrated leachate showed good removal effect on COD, BOD₅, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen and oil in the effluent, but it also led to the rise of salt concentration in the effluent, even higher than the original concentrated leachate.
- concentrated leachate /
- municipal solid waste /
- reinjection /
- methane /
- odor gas /
- salt concentration

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	戚二兵, 黄亚继, 袁琦, 等. 石灰混凝-浸没蒸发协同处理垃圾渗滤液纳滤膜浓缩液[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(12):54-58 ,77.
[2]	戎静. 生活垃圾焚烧厂渗沥液浓缩液处理工艺综述[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2017, 25(2):56-58.
[3]	陈宇, 张杰, 李彦龙, 等. 电化学氧化法处理垃圾浓缩液影响因素研究[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(增刊1):737-739,57.
[4]	王庆国, 张怀玉, 伏培飞, 等. 纳滤浓缩液回灌影响因素研究[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(增刊1):172-174,224.
[5]	史东晓,张怀玉,华建敏,等. 不同回灌堆体和回灌方式对纳滤浓缩液回灌效果的影响[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2012,20(5):11-14.
[6]	MORELLO L, COSSU R, RAGA R, et al. Recirculation of reverse osmosis concentrate in lab-scale anaerobic and aerobic landfill simulation reactors[J]. Waste Manag, 2016, 56:262-270.
[7]	刘研萍, 李秀金, 王宝贞, 等. 渗滤液的反渗透浓缩液回灌研究[J]. 环境工程, 2008,26(4):89-93.
[8]	蒋宝军,李俊生,杨威,等. 垃圾渗滤液反渗透浓缩液回灌处理中试研究[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,22(6):36-40.
[9]	赵成云, 林伯伟, 肖强, 等. 垃圾渗沥液反渗透浓缩液回灌中试研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2011, 19(1):11-15.
[10]	宋延冬, 左俊芳, 朱正贤. 渗滤液的反渗透浓缩液回灌技术应用[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(2):33-36 ,10.
[11]	HARTZ K E, KLINK R E, HAM R K. Temperature effects:methane generation from landfill samples[J]. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, 1982, 108:629-638.
[12]	BARLAZ M A, HAM R K, SCHAEFER D M. Methane production from municipal refuse:a review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 1990:557-584.
[13]	OGATA Y, ISHIGAKI T, NAKAGAWA M, et al. Effect of increasing salinity on biogas production in waste landfills with leachate recirculation:a lab-scale model study[J]. Biotechnology Reports, 2016,10:111-116.
[14]	唐泽雨, 闵祥发, 张玉鹏, 等. 钠离子浓度对丁酸甲烷发酵功能菌群的抑制作用[J]. 中国沼气, 2017, 35(3):16-21.
[15]	吴选辉,郑丽婷. 大中型卫生填埋场臭气治理探索与实践[J]. 环境工程, 2010, 28(4):66-68.
[16]	KO J H, XU Q, JANG Y C. Emissions and control of hydrogen sulfide at landfills:a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 45(19):2043-2083.
[17]	焦迪, 李进, 李娟, 等. 硫酸盐还原菌在中水中的分离及生长特性研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(10):64-67 ,91.
[18]	梁梁, 尹军, 蒋宝军, 等. 垃圾渗滤液回灌处理若干参数控制[J]. 吉林建筑工程学院学报, 2009, 26(3):63-66.
[19]	WANG D M, LIU D, LIU Q M, et al. Research on the variation regularity of effluent from the leachate reverse osmosis concentrate recirculation[J]. Environmental Science, 2014:2822-2828.
[20]	王东梅, 刘丹, 陶丽霞, 等. 渗滤液浓缩液回灌出水盐分对回灌参数的敏感性研究[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(2):100-104.