电阻率成像法在原位修复药剂灌注成效评价中的应用

和丽萍; 李敏敏; 吴见珣; 魏恒; 李丽娜; 刘兴昌; 何哲豪; 陈宜杰; 董天行; 陈慎德

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202303025

电阻率成像法在原位修复药剂灌注成效评价中的应用

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303025

1. 云南省生态环境科学研究院, 昆明 650034;
2. 瑞昶环保科技(云南)有限公司, 昆明 650206

基金项目:

云南省土壤环境管理体系构建及关键修复技术研究与示范项目(H2018539900T-90011)

详细信息

作者简介:
和丽萍,女,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为土壤环境保护及污染治理。hlp.74@qq.com

通讯作者:
刘兴昌,男,副研究员,主要研究方向为物探在环境污染调查的应用。lhchang@g2.nctu.edu.tw

计量
- 文章访问数: 126
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-11-17
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-26
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-01

APPLICATION OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY IN EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF REAGENT INJECTION OF IN-SITU SITE REMEDIATION

1. Yunnan Research Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Kunming 650034, China;
2. Ruichang Environmental Technology (Yunnan) Co., Ltd, Kunming 650206, China

摘要

摘要: 场地原位修复中的修复药剂灌注成效是场地修复成果的关键,因此如何评价修复药剂灌注成效对场地原位修复具有重要意义。采用电阻率成像法(electrical resistivity tomography, ERT)对云南某焦化场地在原位修复过程中的修复药剂灌注成效进行评价。根据灌注前、灌注中、灌注后的地下电性差异及变化特征,推断修复药剂在地下的传输分布情形。结果表明:灌注前后监测井中地下水的水温、pH、电导率、氧化还原电位、溶解氧等基本水质参数的变化与场地2D与3D剖面的电性变化基本保持一致,表明修复药剂灌注成效较好,证实了ERT在原位修复药剂灌注成效评价中具有较好的可行性和适用性,可对类似场地原位修复提供参考借鉴。
- 电阻率成像法 /
- 场地原位修复 /
- 药剂灌注 /
- 成效评价
Abstract: The effect of agent injection in-situ is the key to the results of site remediation. Therefore, evaluating the effect of agent injection is of great significance to site in-situ remediation. In this paper, the effect of agent injection in the process of in-situ repairing a coking site in Yunnan was evaluated by using the cross-hole earth resistance imaging method (ERT). The transmission and distribution of the repairing agent were estimated according to the underground electrical information and electrical changes before, during and after perfusion. The results showed that the changes in water temperature, pH, conductivity, redox potential, dissolved oxygen and other basic water quality parameters of the groundwater in the monitoring wells before and after the injection, were basically consistent with the electrical changes of the 2D and 3D profiles of the site, indicating that the injection effect of the repair agent was good, and it was confirmed that ERT had good feasibility and applicability in the evaluation of injection effect of the in-situ repairing agents, which can provide a reference for the in-situ repairing of similar sites.
- electrical resistivity tomography /
- site in-situ repairing /
- reagent injection /
- effectiveness evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	张峰. 污染场地原位化学药剂注射修复要点分析[J]. 环境保护科学, 2018, 44(2):123-126.
[2]	梁竞, 王世杰, 张文毓, 等. 美国污染场地修复技术对我国修复行业发展的启示[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(6):173-178.
[3]	黄廷林, 王堃, 李娜, 等. 原位投菌技术修复微污染水源水的中试研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(7):2256-2260.
[4]	陈立, 张发旺, 刘少玉, 等. 中原油田石油污染土壤原位生物修复技术实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(10):2385-2390.
[5]	姜勇, 徐刚, 杨洁, 等. 高密度电法在原位修复土壤过程中的监控研究[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2020, 32(6):18-22.
[6]	GOES B J M, MEEKES J A C. An effective electrode configuration for the detedtion of DNAPLs with electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2004, 9(3):127-141.
[7]	ZHOU B, GREENHALGH S A. A synthetic study on crosshole resistivity imaging using different electrode arrays[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1997, 28(1):1-5.
[8]	SUGIMOTO Y. Shallow high-resolution 2-D and 3-D electrical crosshole imaging[J]. The Leading Edge, 1999,18(12):1425-1428.
[9]	董路, 叶腾飞, 能昌信, 等. ERT技术在无机酸污染场地调查中的应用[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(6):67-71.
[10]	BENSON A K, PAYNE K L, STUBBEN M A. Mapping groundwater contamination using dc resistivity and VLF geophysical methods:a case study[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(1):80-86.
[11]	GASPERIKOVAA E, HUBBARDA S S, WATSONC D B, et al. Long-term electrical resistivity monitoring of recharge-induced contaminant plume behavior[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2012, 142/143:33-49.
[12]	CASAS A, HIMI M, DIAZ Y, et al. Assessing aquifer vulnerability to pollutants by electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) at a nitrate vulnerable zone in NE Spain[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 54:515-520.
[13]	SENDRÒS A, DIAZ Y, HIMI M, et al. An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 71:77-84.
[14]	DAILY W, RAMIREZ A, LABRECQUE D, et al. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28:1429-1442.
[15]	JOHNSON T C, SLATER L D, NTARLAGIANIS D, et al. Monitoring groundwater-surface water interaction using time-series and time-frequency analysis of transient three-dimensional electrical resistivity changes[J]. Water Resources Research, 2012, 48:W07506.
[16]	薛禹群, 张幼宽. 地下水污染防治在我国水体污染控制与治理中的双重意义[J]. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(3):474-481.
[17]	杨杰, 师学明, 李立. 延时性高密度电法监测土壤中盐水溶液扩散过程的初步研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2013, 41(10):90-94.