煤气化灰水处理及回用系统的结垢成因解析

安佰红; 杨宏泉; 刘俊; 程艳; 陈洪斌

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202305008

煤气化灰水处理及回用系统的结垢成因解析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305008

1. 同济大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 200092;
2. 中石化宁波工程有限公司, 浙江宁波 315103;
3. 宁波神同环境科技有限公司, 浙江宁波 315105

基金项目:

宁波市科技计划项目(2020Z102)

详细信息

作者简介:
安佰红(1989-),女,博士,主要研究方向为工业废水电化学处理及资源化技术。2010392@tongji.edu.cn

通讯作者:
陈洪斌(1969-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为水污染控制理论与资源化技术。bhctxc@tongji.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 67
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-07

ANALYSIS ON SCALE FORMATION IN TREATMENT AND REUSE SYSTEM FOR COAL GASIFICATION ASH-CONTAINING WATER

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Sinopec Ningbo Engineering Company Limited, Ningbo 315103, China;
3. Ningbo Shentong Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Ningbo 315105, China

摘要

摘要: 煤气化过程中产生的灰水具有高温、高硬度、高氨和高悬浮物等特点,使现有预处理设施和回用系统的结垢与堵塞现象较为严重。为探明其结垢成因,在调研处理设施的基础上,研究了煤气化装置的灰水处理与回用管道、设施等的垢形物组成与结构。结果表明:灰水预处理与回用管道和设施的垢样形貌多样,呈块状、线状、管状、球状和花瓣状等,由Si、Ca、Mg、B、Al、Fe、S、Na、Mn、Ba等元素组成复杂化合物,以CaCO₃、Al₂O₃·SiO₂、MgCO₃·3H₂O、CaSiO₃、K₂O·Na₂O·Al₂O₃·SiO₂·H₂O、Fe₂O₃、CaSO₄、CaO·Al₂O₃·2SiO₂、Ca₄Mg[B₄O₆(OH)₆](CO₃)₂、SiO₂等形式存在。高温条件下钙镁硬度等引起的管壁沉积及其他元素的化合物共沉淀、灰水残余煤灰颗粒黏附管壁和设施底部等是成垢的主要原因;提升黑水和灰水的预处理效果,尤其是强化高温条件下的多种金属和非金属离子的同步去除效率是延缓灰水系统结垢的关键。
- 煤气化 /
- 结垢 /
- 形貌和组分 /
- 结垢机制
Abstract: The wastewater produced in the process of coal gasification is characterized by high values in temperature, hardness, ammonia and suspended solids, so the existing pretreatment facilities and reuse systems are severely scaled and clogged. In order to find out the cause of scale formation, based on the investigation of the operation of the treatment facilities, the composition and structure of scaling substance in ash-containing water treatment and recycling pipes and facilities of coal gasification units were studied. The result indicated that the scale morphology of ash-containing water pretreatment and reuse pipes and facilities was diverse, shaped in blocks, lines, tubes, balls and petals, which were complex compounds composed of silicon, calcium, magnesium, boron, aluminum, iron, sulfur, sodium, manganese, barium and other elements, and its main components were CaCO₃, Al₂O₃·SiO₂, MgCO₃·3H₂O, CaSiO₃, K₂O·Na₂O·Al₂O₃·SiO₂·H₂O, Fe₂O₃, CaSO₄, Ca₄Mg[B₄O₆(OH)₆](CO₃)₂, SiO₂, etc. The main causes of scale formation were tube wall deposition caused by calcium and magnesium hardness at high temperatures, compound co-precipitation of other elements, and residual ash particles adhering to the tube wall and bottom of facilities. Improving the pretreatment effect of black water and ash-containing water, especially enhancing the simultaneous removal efficiency of various metal and nonmetal ions at high temperature were the key to delaying the scaling of the ash-containing water treatment and reuse system.
- coal gasification /
- scale /
- morphology and composition /
- scale formation

HTML全文

参考文献(33)

[1]	GUO Y, ZHANG Y X, ZHAO X, et al. Multifaceted evaluation of distribution, occurrence, and leaching features of typical heavy metals in different-sized coal gasification fine slag from Ningdong region, China: a case study[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 831:154726.
[2]	徐振刚. 中国现代煤化工近25年发展回顾·反思·展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(8):1-25.
[3]	WANG G F, XU Y X, REN H W. Intelligent and ecological coal mining as well as clean utilization technology in China: review and prospects[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2019, 29(2):161-169.
[4]	XU J, YANG Y, LI Y W. Recent development in converting coal to clean fuels in China[J]. Fuel, 2015, 152:122-130.
[5]	张文, 林长喜, 彭永臻. 现代煤化工废水近零排放技术集成与优化建议[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(11): 41-45 ,109.
[6]	NIU Y J, XU J, MIAO Z K, et al. Distribution modes of residual carbon and ash in coal gasification fine slag and its feasibility analysis as particle electrodes[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 303:135159-135171.
[7]	ZHU H, HAN Y X, XU C Y, et al. Overview of the state of the art of processes and technical bottlenecks for coal gasification wastewater treatment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 637/638:1108-1126.
[8]	ONCEL M S, MUHCU A, DEMIRBAS E, et al. A comparative study of chemical precipitation and electrocoagulation for treatment of coal acid drainage wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2013, 1(4): 989-995.
[9]	JIA S Y, ZHUANG H F, HAN H J, et al. Application of industrial ecology in water utilization of coal chemical industry: a case study in Erdos, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 20-29.
[10]	肖关忠. 焦化厂废水去除SS及硬度的工程应用设计[J].净水技术, 2017, 36(8):85-89.
[11]	BATHLA A, KAUR D, PAL B. Impact of metal ions (Cr⁶⁺/Mn⁷⁺) loaded CaCO₃ extracted from tap water for adsorption/degradation of toxic pollutants under sunlight[J]. Materials. Express, 2022, 12:106-113.
[12]	HE Z, XU Y, YANG X, et al. Passivation of heavy metals in copper-nickel tailings by in-situ bio-mineralization: a pilot trial and mechanistic analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 838: 156504.
[13]	ABIR F, MESNAUI M, ABOULIATIM Y, et al. Effect of the addition of iron oxide on the microstructure of ye’elimite[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022,151: 106625.
[14]	LIU D, WANG W, TU Y, et al. Flotation specificity of coal gasification fine slag based on release analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 363: 132426-132436.
[15]	PRAZERES A R, FEMANDES F, LUZA S, et al. Simple processes for contamination removal in cheesemaking wastewater: CaCO₃, Mg(OH)₂, FeSO₄ and FeCl₃[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8:104034-104041.
[16]	WANG Y F, TANG Y G, HUAN B B, et al. Chemical composition changes during the commercial entrained-flow general electric and gaskombinat schwarze pumpe coal gasification processes[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35:883-893.
[17]	LAABS M, SCHWITALLA D H, GE Z, et al. Comparison of setups for measuring the viscosity of coal ash slags for entrained-flow gasification[J]. Fuel, 2022, 307:121777.
[18]	BAGATINI M C, KLUG G L, HECK N C, et al. Behaviour of coal ashes for pulverised coal injection at high temperatures in relation to their chemical and mineralogical composition-experimental and computational analysis[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2009, 36:582-589.
[19]	QIAN B F, WANG Y L, ZHAO Q R, et al. Preparation and luminescence properties of Eu³⁺ incorporated in CaCO₃ nanocrystals with multiple sites[J]. Journal of Luminescence, 2021, 239:118344.
[20]	SCHWITALLA D H, GUHL S, LAABS M, et al. Thermochemical and analytical approach to describe secondary slag phase formation and local process conditions in a full-scale BGL gasifier[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 217:106833.
[21]	LI N, LI Y, BAN Y P, et al. Direct production of high hydrogen syngas by steam gasification of Shengli lignite/chars: remarkable promotion effect of inherent minerals and pyrolysis temperature[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(9): 5865-5872.
[22]	LU H, BAI J, VASSILEV S V, et al. The crystallization behavior of anorthite in coal ash slag under gasification condition[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 445:136683.
[23]	VARGAS S, FRANDSEN F, DAM-JOHANSEN K. Rheological properties of high-temperature melts of coal ashes and other silicates[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27:237-429.
[24]	姚芳华,王振宏,郑亚娟. 含硼废液处理方法的研究进展[R]. 黑龙江:中国核学会, 2011.
[25]	HAO C, ZHOU Y, CAO J X, et al. Phosphorus co-existing in water: a new mechanism to boost boron removal by calcined oyster shell powder[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27:54-64.
[26]	辞海, 理科(上)[M]. 上海:上海辞书出版社, 1978.
[27]	MEHMET B. Ash melting behaviour of some low-grade Turkish coals and some imported steam coals[J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2019, 23:1105-1118.
[28]	TENG K H, KAZI S N, AMIRI A, et al. Calcium carbonate fouling on double-pipe heat exchanger with different heat exchanging surfaces[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 315:216-226.
[29]	高旭, 李鹏, 王学刚,等. EDTA螯合-电絮凝处理低浓度含铀废水[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(7): 27-32.
[30]	侯海萌, 祁国恕, 王坚,等. BDD电极电化学氧化降解废乳化液[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(1): 46-51.
[31]	袁金刚, 朱继双, 韩勇,等. 电絮凝技术处理煤气化灰水[J]. 化工环保, 2018, 38(5): 541-545.
[32]	程一杰, 于志勇, 曹求洋,等. 冲渣循环水管道结垢原因分析及化学清洗[J]. 工业水处理, 2016, 36: 115-117.
[33]	焦庆祝, 艾李申. 工业设备化学清洗方法与缓蚀技术[J]. 清洗世界, 2018, 34(2): 28-33 ,48.